Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts

Hindemith L, Göpfert JP, Wiebel-Herboth CB, Wrede B, Vollmer A-L (2021)
Interaction Studies 22(2): 244-279.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
Research in social robotics is commonly focused on designing robots that imitate human behavior. While this might increase a user's satisfaction and acceptance of robots at first glance, it does not automatically aid a non-expert user in naturally interacting with robots, and might hurt their ability to correctly anticipate a robot's capabilities. We argue that a faulty mental model, that the user has of the robot, is one of the main sources of confusion. In this work, we investigate how communicating technical concepts of robotic systems to users affect their mental models, and how this can increase the quality of human-robot interaction. We conducted an online study and investigated possible ways of improving users' mental models. Our results underline that communicating technical concepts can form an improved mental model. Consequently, we show the importance of consciously designing robots that express their capabilities and limitations.
Stichworte
human-robot interaction; mental models; interaction design; robot; architecture; technical concepts; robot transparency
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Zeitschriftentitel
Interaction Studies
Band
22
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
244-279
ISSN
1572-0373
eISSN
1572-0381
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2961876

Zitieren

Hindemith L, Göpfert JP, Wiebel-Herboth CB, Wrede B, Vollmer A-L. Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts. Interaction Studies . 2021;22(2):244-279.
Hindemith, L., Göpfert, J. P., Wiebel-Herboth, C. B., Wrede, B., & Vollmer, A. - L. (2021). Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts. Interaction Studies , 22(2), 244-279. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.20023.hin
Hindemith, Lukas, Göpfert, Jan Philip, Wiebel-Herboth, Christiane B., Wrede, Britta, and Vollmer, Anna-Lisa. 2021. “Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts”. Interaction Studies 22 (2): 244-279.
Hindemith, L., Göpfert, J. P., Wiebel-Herboth, C. B., Wrede, B., and Vollmer, A. - L. (2021). Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts. Interaction Studies 22, 244-279.
Hindemith, L., et al., 2021. Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts. Interaction Studies , 22(2), p 244-279.
L. Hindemith, et al., “Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts”, Interaction Studies , vol. 22, 2021, pp. 244-279.
Hindemith, L., Göpfert, J.P., Wiebel-Herboth, C.B., Wrede, B., Vollmer, A.-L.: Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts. Interaction Studies . 22, 244-279 (2021).
Hindemith, Lukas, Göpfert, Jan Philip, Wiebel-Herboth, Christiane B., Wrede, Britta, and Vollmer, Anna-Lisa. “Why robots should be technical correcting mental models through technical architecture concepts”. Interaction Studies 22.2 (2021): 244-279.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar