Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control

Fleer S, Ritter H (2017)
In: Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 68-75.

Sammelwerksbeitrag | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
Finding good principles to choose the actions of artificial agents like robots in the most beneficial way to optimize their control of the environment is very much in the focus of current research in the field of intelligent systems. Especially in reinforcement learning, where the agent learns through the direct interaction with the environment, a good choice of actions is essential. We propose a new approach that allows a predictive ranking of different action sets with regard to their influence on the learning performance of an artificial agent. Our approach is based on a measure of control that utilizes the concept of mutual information. To evaluate this approach, we investigate its prediction of the effectiveness of different sets of actions in “mediated interaction” scenarios. Our results indicate that the mutual information-based measure can yield useful predictions on the aptitude of action sets for the learning process.
Stichworte
Reinforcement learning; Environment control; Q-learning; Mutual information; Mediated interaction learning; Physics-based simulation
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Buchtitel
Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017
Serientitel
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Seite(n)
68-75
Konferenz
26th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks
Konferenzort
Alghero, Italy
Konferenzdatum
2017-09-11 – 2017-09-11
ISBN
9783319685991, 9783319686004
ISSN
0302-9743, 1611-3349
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2914841

Zitieren

Fleer S, Ritter H. Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control. In: Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017: 68-75.
Fleer, S., & Ritter, H. (2017). Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 68-75. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68600-4_9
Fleer, Sascha, and Ritter, Helge. 2017. “Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control”. In Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017, 68-75. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Fleer, S., and Ritter, H. (2017). “Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control” in Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 68-75.
Fleer, S., & Ritter, H., 2017. Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control. In Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 68-75.
S. Fleer and H. Ritter, “Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control”, Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp.68-75.
Fleer, S., Ritter, H.: Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. p. 68-75. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017).
Fleer, Sascha, and Ritter, Helge. “Comparing Action Sets: Mutual Information as a Measure of Control”. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2017. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 68-75.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Suchen in

Google Scholar
ISBN Suche