Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains
Angerer F, Mennel V, Grund S, Mayer A, Büscher R, Sander LB, Cuijpers P, Terhorst Y, Baumeister H, Domhardt M (2024)
Journal of Affective Disorders 368: 615-632.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Angerer, Florian;
Mennel, Vera;
Grund, Simon;
Mayer, AxelUniBi;
Büscher, Rebekka;
Sander, Lasse B.;
Cuijpers, Pim;
Terhorst, Yannik;
Baumeister, Harald;
Domhardt, Matthias
Abstract / Bemerkung
BACKGROUND: While the efficacy of digital interventions for the treatment of depression is well established, comprehensive knowledge on how therapeutic changes come about is still limited. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of research on change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and meta-analytically evaluate indirect effects of potential mediators.; METHODS: The databases CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating mediators of digital interventions for adults with depression. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and categorized potential mediators. Indirect effects were synthesized with a two-stage structural equation modeling approach (TSSEM).; RESULTS: Overall, 25 trials (8110 participants) investigating 84 potential mediators were identified, of which attentional (8 %), self-related (6 %), biophysiological (6 %), affective (5 %), socio-cultural (2 %) and motivational (1 %) variables were the scope of this study. TSSEM revealed significant mediation effects for combined self-related variables (ab = -0.098; 95 %-CI: [-0.150, -0.051]), combined biophysiological variables (ab = -0.073; 95 %-CI: [-0.119, -0.025]) and mindfulness (ab = -0.042; 95 %-CI: [-0.080, -0.015]). Meta-analytical evaluations of the other three domains were not feasible.; LIMITATIONS: Methodological shortcomings of the included studies, the considerable heterogeneity and the small number of investigated variables within domains limit the generalizability of the results.; CONCLUSION: The findings further the understanding of potential change mechanisms in digital interventions for depression and highlight recommendations for future process research, such as the consideration of temporal precedence and experimental manipulation of potential mediators, as well as the application of network approaches. Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Affective Disorders
Band
368
Seite(n)
615-632
ISSN
1573-2517
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2992801
Zitieren
Angerer F, Mennel V, Grund S, et al. Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2024;368:615-632.
Angerer, F., Mennel, V., Grund, S., Mayer, A., Büscher, R., Sander, L. B., Cuijpers, P., et al. (2024). Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains. Journal of Affective Disorders, 368, 615-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.055
Angerer, Florian, Mennel, Vera, Grund, Simon, Mayer, Axel, Büscher, Rebekka, Sander, Lasse B., Cuijpers, Pim, Terhorst, Yannik, Baumeister, Harald, and Domhardt, Matthias. 2024. “Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains”. Journal of Affective Disorders 368: 615-632.
Angerer, F., Mennel, V., Grund, S., Mayer, A., Büscher, R., Sander, L. B., Cuijpers, P., Terhorst, Y., Baumeister, H., and Domhardt, M. (2024). Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains. Journal of Affective Disorders 368, 615-632.
Angerer, F., et al., 2024. Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains. Journal of Affective Disorders, 368, p 615-632.
F. Angerer, et al., “Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains”, Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 368, 2024, pp. 615-632.
Angerer, F., Mennel, V., Grund, S., Mayer, A., Büscher, R., Sander, L.B., Cuijpers, P., Terhorst, Y., Baumeister, H., Domhardt, M.: Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains. Journal of Affective Disorders. 368, 615-632 (2024).
Angerer, Florian, Mennel, Vera, Grund, Simon, Mayer, Axel, Büscher, Rebekka, Sander, Lasse B., Cuijpers, Pim, Terhorst, Yannik, Baumeister, Harald, and Domhardt, Matthias. “Mechanisms of change in digital interventions for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of six mediator domains”. Journal of Affective Disorders 368 (2024): 615-632.
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 39284530
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in