PUB - Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld

Modularity as observed in biological systems has proven valuable for guiding classical motor theories towards good answers about action selection and execution. New challenges arise when we turn to learning: Trying to scale current computational models, such as deep reinforcement learning (DRL), to action spaces, input dimensions, and time horizons seen in biological systems still faces severe obstacles unless vast amounts of training data are available. This leads to the question: does biological modularity also hold an important key for better answers to obtain efficient adaptivity for deep reinforcement learning? We review biological experimental work on modularity in biological motor control and link this with current examples of (deep) RL approaches. Analyzing outcomes of simulation studies, we show that these approaches benefit from forms of modularization as found in biological systems. We identify three different strands of modularity exhibited in biological control systems. Two of them-modularity in state (i) and in action (ii) spaces-appear as a consequence of local interconnectivity (as in reflexes) and are often modulated by higher levels in a control hierarchy. A third strand arises from chunking of action elements along a (iii) temporal dimension. Usually interacting in an overarching spatio-temporal hierarchy of the overall system, the three strands offer major "factors" decomposing the entire modularity structure. We conclude that modularity with its above strands can provide an effective prior for DRL approaches to speed up learning considerably and making learned controllers more robust and adaptive.