How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective

Alber J, Jumpertz J, Mayer A (2020)
Scientific Study of Literature 10(2): 193-213.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Alber, Jan; Jumpertz, Jessica; Mayer, AxelUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
In an experiment, the authors tried to find out how professional readers deal with unnatural narrators (such as a narrating parrot and a speaking coin). The hypotheses and research questions were mostly derived from Jan Alber’s proposed reading strategies and operationalized to be measured with the help of a close-ended questionnaire. Thirty-two students of English from RWTH Aachen University took part in the study and were presented with four text passages that featured two natural and two unnatural first-person narrators. These excerpts represented a gliding scale of defamiliarization or estrangement in the sense of Shklovsky that ranges from (1) a realist backpacking tourist in India to (2) a narrator who suffers from hallucinations (both natural), and from there to (3) a narrating parrot and, finally, (4) a speaking coin (both unnatural). The results indicate that the participants perceived the narratives that featured unnatural narrators as being more estranging than the ones that contained natural narrators, and that unnaturalness was regarded as an indicator of fictionality. Furthermore, it was easier for the participants to emotionally engage with the natural (compared to the unnatural) narrators. The study also shows that blending was used as a strategy to make sense of the unnatural narrators, and that the participants thought that fictional worlds were relevant for their own world experiences – regardless of whether the narrators were unnatural or not. Furthermore, most of the participants were reminded of familiar genres (fantasy stories or fairy tales) when they dealt with the unnatural narrators.
Stichworte
cognitive approaches to literature; defamiliarization; empirical literary studies; processing of the impossible; unnatural narrators
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Zeitschriftentitel
Scientific Study of Literature
Band
10
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
193-213
ISSN
2210-4372
eISSN
2210-4380
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2955575

Zitieren

Alber J, Jumpertz J, Mayer A. How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective. Scientific Study of Literature. 2020;10(2):193-213.
Alber, J., Jumpertz, J., & Mayer, A. (2020). How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective. Scientific Study of Literature, 10(2), 193-213. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.19005.alb
Alber, J., Jumpertz, J., and Mayer, A. (2020). How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective. Scientific Study of Literature 10, 193-213.
Alber, J., Jumpertz, J., & Mayer, A., 2020. How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective. Scientific Study of Literature, 10(2), p 193-213.
J. Alber, J. Jumpertz, and A. Mayer, “How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective”, Scientific Study of Literature, vol. 10, 2020, pp. 193-213.
Alber, J., Jumpertz, J., Mayer, A.: How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective. Scientific Study of Literature. 10, 193-213 (2020).
Alber, Jan, Jumpertz, Jessica, and Mayer, Axel. “How professional readers process unnatural narrators: An empirical perspective”. Scientific Study of Literature 10.2 (2020): 193-213.

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Suchen in

Google Scholar