Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?

Schönfelder N (2020)
Quantitative Science Studies 1(1): 6-27.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 879.17 KB
Abstract / Bemerkung
With the ongoing open-access transformation, article processing charges (APCs) are gaining importance as one of the main business models for open-access publishing in scientific journals. This paper analyzes how much of APC pricing can be attributed to journal-related factors. With UK data from OpenAPC (which aggregates fees paid for open-access articles by universities, funders, and research institutions), APCs are explained by the following variables: (a) the “source normalized impact per paper” (SNIP), (b) whether the journal is open access or hybrid, (c) the publisher of the journal, (d) the subject area of the journal, and (e) the year. The results of the multivariate linear regression show that the journal’s impact and hybrid status are the most important factors for the level of APCs. However, the relationship between APC and SNIP is different for open-access journals and hybrid journals. APCs paid to open-access journals were found to be strongly increasing in conjunction with higher journal citation impact, whereas this relationship was observed to be much looser for articles in hybrid journals. This paper goes beyond simple statistics, which have been discussed so far in the literature, by using control variables and applying statistical inference.
Stichworte
article processing charge; source normalized impact per paper; open access; multivariate regression; OpenAPC
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Zeitschriftentitel
Quantitative Science Studies
Band
1
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
6-27
eISSN
2641-3337
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2940042

Zitieren

Schönfelder N. Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies. 2020;1(1):6-27.
Schönfelder, N. (2020). Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00015
Schönfelder, Nina. 2020. “Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?”. Quantitative Science Studies 1 (1): 6-27.
Schönfelder, N. (2020). Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies 1, 6-27.
Schönfelder, N., 2020. Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), p 6-27.
N. Schönfelder, “Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?”, Quantitative Science Studies, vol. 1, 2020, pp. 6-27.
Schönfelder, N.: Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model? Quantitative Science Studies. 1, 6-27 (2020).
Schönfelder, Nina. “Article processing charges: Mirroring the citation impact or legacy of the subscription-based model?”. Quantitative Science Studies 1.1 (2020): 6-27.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2020-03-17T07:59:26Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
9e199444a193db81b54d2de320564771


Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar