Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations

Koester D, Schack T (2016)
PLOS ONE 11(12): e0165882.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 4.41 MB
Abstract / Bemerkung
Handling our everyday life, we often react manually to verbal requests or instruction, but the functional interrelations of motor control and language are not fully understood yet, especially their neurophysiological basis. Here, we investigated whether specific motor representations for grip types interact neurophysiologically with conceptual information, that is, when reading nouns. Participants performed lexical decisions and, for words, executed a grasp-and-lift task on objects of different sizes involving precision or power grips while the electroencephalogram was recorded. Nouns could denote objects that require either a precision or a power grip and could, thus, be (in)congruent with the performed grasp. In a control block, participants pointed at the objects instead of grasping them. The main result revealed an event-related potential (ERP) interaction of grip type and conceptual information which was not present for pointing. Incongruent compared to congruent conditions elicited an increased positivity (100–200 ms after noun onset). Grip type effects were obtained in response-locked analyses of the grasping ERPs (100–300 ms at left anterior electrodes). These findings attest that grip type and conceptual information are functionally related when planning a grasping action but such an interaction could not be detected for pointing. Generally, the results suggest that control of behaviour can be modulated by task demands; conceptual noun information (i.e., associated action knowledge) may gain processing priority if the task requires a complex motor response. Data basis is available under: http://dx.doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2906584
Stichworte
action; motor control; language; EEG; ERP; cognition
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Zeitschriftentitel
PLOS ONE
Band
11
Ausgabe
12
Art.-Nr.
e0165882
ISSN
1932-6203
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2907780

Zitieren

Koester D, Schack T. Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(12): e0165882.
Koester, D., & Schack, T. (2016). Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0165882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165882
Koester, Dirk, and Schack, Thomas. 2016. “Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations”. PLOS ONE 11 (12): e0165882.
Koester, D., and Schack, T. (2016). Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations. PLOS ONE 11:e0165882.
Koester, D., & Schack, T., 2016. Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations. PLOS ONE, 11(12): e0165882.
D. Koester and T. Schack, “Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations”, PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 2016, : e0165882.
Koester, D., Schack, T.: Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations. PLOS ONE. 11, : e0165882 (2016).
Koester, Dirk, and Schack, Thomas. “Action Priority: Early Neurophysiological Interaction of Conceptual and Motor Representations”. PLOS ONE 11.12 (2016): e0165882.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-25T06:39:09Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
101a545a7295fa1a0e13bb4a4e71f3fb


2 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Are Sensory-Motor Relationships Encoded ad hoc or by Default?: An ERP Study.
Morera Y, van der Meij M, de Vega M, Barber HA., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 31133923
Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.
Gunduz Can R, Schack T, Koester D., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 28611714

111 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Expertise affects representation structure and categorical activation of grasp postures in climbing.
Blasing BE, Guldenpenning I, Koester D, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25309480
The prehensile movements of the human hand
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1956
Communicating hands: ERPs elicited by meaningful symbolic hand postures.
Gunter TC, Bach P., Neurosci. Lett. 372(1-2), 2004
PMID: 15531087
Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures.
Goldin-Meadow S, Mylander C., Nature 391(6664), 1998
PMID: 9440690
From hand to mouth: some critical stages in the evolution of language.
Steklis HD, Harnad SR., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 280(), 1976
PMID: 827953
On the evolution of language and generativity.
Corballis MC., Cognition 44(3), 1992
PMID: 1424492
Spoken language and arm gestures are controlled by the same motor control system
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.
Todorov E., Nat. Neurosci. 7(9), 2004
PMID: 15332089
The accuracy of voluntary movement
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1899
A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming.
Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R., Psychol Bull 127(3), 2001
PMID: 11393300
Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping.
Glover S, Dixon P., Exp Brain Res 146(3), 2002
PMID: 12232695
Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men.
Elliot AJ, Kayser DN, Greitemeyer T, Lichtenfeld S, Gramzow RH, Maier MA, Liu H., J Exp Psychol Gen 139(3), 2010
PMID: 20677892
The neuroscience of grasping.
Castiello U., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6(9), 2005
PMID: 16100518

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1960
Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1992
The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.
Grafton ST., Exp Brain Res 204(4), 2010
PMID: 20532487
Methodological consequences of weak embodied cognition and shared intentionality
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2016
From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: a review
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2014
Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.
Meteyard L, Cuadrado SR, Bahrami B, Vigliocco G., Cortex 48(7), 2010
PMID: 21163473
Six views of embodied cognition
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2002
Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex.
Hauk O, Johnsrude I, Pulvermuller F., Neuron 41(2), 2004
PMID: 14741110
Actions, words, and numbers a motor contribution to semantic processing?
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
The minimalist grammar of action
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012
The neural basis of tool use.
Goldenberg G, Spatt J., Brain 132(Pt 6), 2009
PMID: 19351777
Comparing natural and constrained movements: new insights into the visuomotor control of grasping.
Begliomini C, Caria A, Grodd W, Castiello U., PLoS ONE 2(10), 2007
PMID: 17971871
Parieto-frontal coding of reaching: an integrated framework.
Burnod Y, Baraduc P, Battaglia-Mayer A, Guigon E, Koechlin E, Ferraina S, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R., Exp Brain Res 129(3), 1999
PMID: 10591906
Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.
Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M., Exp Brain Res 71(3), 1988
PMID: 3416965
Functional anatomy of pointing and grasping in humans.
Grafton ST, Fagg AH, Woods RP, Arbib MA., Cereb. Cortex 6(2), 1996
PMID: 8670653
Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions.
Mukamel R, Ekstrom AD, Kaplan J, Iacoboni M, Fried I., Curr. Biol. 20(8), 2010
PMID: 20381353
Awareness affects motor planning for goal-oriented actions.
Bozzacchi C, Giusti MA, Pitzalis S, Spinelli D, Di Russo F., Biol Psychol 89(2), 2012
PMID: 22234365
Event-related brain potentials for goal-related power grips.
Westerholz J, Schack T, Koester D., PLoS ONE 8(7), 2013
PMID: 23844211
Co-registering kinematics and evoked related potentials during visually guided reach-to-grasp movements.
De Sanctis T, Tarantino V, Straulino E, Begliomini C, Castiello U., PLoS ONE 8(6), 2013
PMID: 23755241
Habitual vs non-habitual manual actions: an ERP study on overt movement execution.
Westerholz J, Schack T, Schutz C, Koester D., PLoS ONE 9(4), 2014
PMID: 24691654
Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1965
Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.
Kutas M, Federmeier KD., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 4(12), 2000
PMID: 11115760
Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension.
Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen M, Petersson KM., Science 304(5669), 2004
PMID: 15031438
Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1999
N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation.
Bach P, Gunter TC, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Friederici AD., Soc Neurosci 4(3), 2008
PMID: 19023701
The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials.
Penolazzi B, Hauk O, Pulvermuller F., Biol Psychol 74(3), 2006
PMID: 17150298
Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Action semantics modulate action prediction
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2010
Grasping the meaning of words.
Glover S, Rosenbaum DA, Graham J, Dixon P., Exp Brain Res 154(1), 2003
PMID: 14578997
Language and motor control.
Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M., Exp Brain Res 133(4), 2000
PMID: 10985682
Semantic activation in action planning
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2006
Context Effects on the Processing of Action-Relevant Object Features
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2010
Subliminal display of action words interferes with motor planning: a combined EEG and kinematic study
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
250 ms to code for action affordance during observation of manipulable objects.
Proverbio AM, Adorni R, D'Aniello GE., Neuropsychologia 49(9), 2011
PMID: 21664367
Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position.
Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M., Exp Brain Res 83(3), 1991
PMID: 2026193
Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1983
Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses.
Sell AJ, Kaschak MP., Brain Lang 117(1), 2010
PMID: 20696469

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1979
Representation and learning in motor action–Bridges between experimental research and cognitive robotics
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
Action priming by briefly presented objects
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2004
Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2006
CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN.
WALTER WG, COOPER R, ALDRIDGE VJ, MCCALLUM WC, WINTER AL., Nature 203(), 1964
PMID: 14197376
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
Oldfield RC., Neuropsychologia 9(1), 1971
PMID: 5146491
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
The timing of natural prehension movements
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1984
Prehension is really reaching and grasping.
van de Kamp C, Zaal FT., Exp Brain Res 182(1), 2007
PMID: 17516058
An investigation of the neural circuits underlying reaching and reach-to-grasp movements: from planning to execution.
Begliomini C, De Sanctis T, Marangon M, Tarantino V, Sartori L, Miotto D, Motta R, Stramare R, Castiello U., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 25228872
Grasping versus pointing and the differential use of visual feedback
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1993
Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.
Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R., Exp Brain Res 87(2), 1991
PMID: 1769391

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1995
dlexDB—eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2011
The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2001
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2004
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1983
Dissociation between contingent negative variation (CNV) and Bereitschaftspotential (BP) in patients with parkinsonism
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1997
Patterns of cortical activation during planning of voluntary movement
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1989
Preparing for Action: Inferences from CNV and LRP
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2004

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2005
Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials.
Kutas M, Donchin E., Brain Res. 202(1), 1980
PMID: 7427748
Das Bereitschaftspotential (Bp)—Bewegungskorrelierte Änderungen in der bioelektrischen Hirnaktivität
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1987
Precision and power grip priming by observed grasping.
Vainio L, Tucker M, Ellis R., Brain Cogn 65(2), 2007
PMID: 17766020

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2005

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1999
Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.
Mangun GR., Psychophysiology 32(1), 1995
PMID: 7878167

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1992
Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing.
Hillyard SA, Teder-Salejarvi WA, Munte TF., Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8(2), 1998
PMID: 9635203
Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
Dambacher M, Kliegl R, Hofmann M, Jacobs AM., Brain Res. 1084(1), 2006
PMID: 16545344
Event-related potentials reveal rapid verification of predicted visual input.
Dambacher M, Rolfs M, Gollner K, Kliegl R, Jacobs AM., PLoS ONE 4(3), 2009
PMID: 19333386
Context effects in word recognition: evidence for early interactive processing.
Sereno SC, Brewer CC, O'Donnell PJ., Psychol Sci 14(4), 2003
PMID: 12807405
Moving and memorizing: Motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2009
The relationship between end-state comfort effects and memory performance in serial and free recall
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2011
The Functional Role of Working Memory in the (Re) Planning and Execution of Grasping Movements
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
Motor expertise modulates movement processing in working memory
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2000
Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2004
Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2005

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1991
A new view on grasping.
Smeets JB, Brenner E., Motor Control 3(3), 1999
PMID: 10409797
Externes Material:
Wissenschaftliche Version
Beschreibung
Data basis is available under: http://dx.doi.org/10.4119/unibi/2906584
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 27973539
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar