Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions

Süssenbach P, Eyssel FA, Bohner G (2013)
Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28(11): 2250-2272.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
The authors present a metacognitive approach to influences of rape myth acceptance (RMA) on the processing of rape-related information and rape proclivity. In Study 1, participants (N = 264) completed an RMA scale and subsequently reported the subjective strength (e.g., importance, certainty) of their RMA. Then they read about a rape case, viewed a photograph of the alleged crime scene, and rated the defendant's guilt on several items. Depending on condition, the photograph contained either RMA-applicable stimuli (e.g., alcoholic beverages) or neutral stimuli. Higher RMA predicted lower ratings of defendant guilt especially when applicable stimuli were present and RMA was strong. Study 2 (N = 85) showed that RMA-related attitude strength also moderated the effect of RMA on self-reported rape proclivity. Results of both studies indicate that the subjective strength of rape-related beliefs may be reliably assessed and serves as an important moderator of effects of RMA. The implications of these findings for prevention programs as well as future directions for research are discussed.
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Band
28
Ausgabe
11
Seite(n)
2250-2272
ISSN
0886-2605, 1552-6518
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2906834

Zitieren

Süssenbach P, Eyssel FA, Bohner G. Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2013;28(11):2250-2272.
Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F. A., & Bohner, G. (2013). Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(11), 2250-2272. doi:10.1177/0886260512475317
Süssenbach, Philipp, Eyssel, Friederike Anne, and Bohner, Gerd. 2013. “Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28 (11): 2250-2272.
Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F. A., and Bohner, G. (2013). Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28, 2250-2272.
Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F.A., & Bohner, G., 2013. Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(11), p 2250-2272.
P. Süssenbach, F.A. Eyssel, and G. Bohner, “Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 28, 2013, pp. 2250-2272.
Süssenbach, P., Eyssel, F.A., Bohner, G.: Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 28, 2250-2272 (2013).
Süssenbach, Philipp, Eyssel, Friederike Anne, and Bohner, Gerd. “Metacognitive aspects of rape myths: Subjective strength of rape myth acceptance moderates its effects on information processing and behavioral intentions”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28.11 (2013): 2250-2272.

3 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Looking for Blame: Rape Myth Acceptance and Attention to Victim and Perpetrator.
Süssenbach P, Eyssel F, Rees J, Bohner G., J Interpers Violence 32(15), 2017
PMID: 26130682

53 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Berkowitz, 2003

Bohner, 1998

Bohner, 2009

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Burt, 1991

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Grice, 1975

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Kreft, 0

Krosnick, 1995

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Paulhus, 1998

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Petty, 1995
Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: a review.
Pollard P., Br J Soc Psychol 31 ( Pt 4)(), 1992
PMID: 1472985

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Ward, 1995

Ward, 2006

Wegener, 1995
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 23400886
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar