On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)

Geiser C, Eid M, Nussbeck FW (2008)
Psychological methods 13(1): 49-57.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Geiser, Christian; Eid, Michael; Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.UniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an application to the Life Orientation Test (M. F. Scheier & C. S. Carver, 1985), Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman found that results obtained from the CT-C(M-1) model were difficult to interpret. In particular, Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman challenged the asymmetry of the CT-C(M-1) model. In the present article, the authors show that the difficulties faced by Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman rest upon an improper interpretation of the meaning of the latent factors. The authors' aim is to clarify the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model. The authors explain how to properly interpret the results from this model and introduce an alternative restricted model that is conceptually similar to the CT-C(M-1) model and nested within it. The fit of this model is invariant across different reference methods. Finally, the authors provide guidelines as to which model should be used in which research context.
Stichworte
Psychology/statistics & numerical data; Psychology/methods; Psychological; Models; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology); Humans; Regression Analysis
Erscheinungsjahr
2008
Zeitschriftentitel
Psychological methods
Band
13
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
49-57
ISSN
1082-989X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2781730

Zitieren

Geiser C, Eid M, Nussbeck FW. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods. 2008;13(1):49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods, 13(1), 49-57. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.49
Geiser, Christian, Eid, Michael, and Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. 2008. “On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)”. Psychological methods 13 (1): 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., and Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods 13, 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F.W., 2008. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods, 13(1), p 49-57.
C. Geiser, M. Eid, and F.W. Nussbeck, “On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)”, Psychological methods, vol. 13, 2008, pp. 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F.W.: On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods. 13, 49-57 (2008).
Geiser, Christian, Eid, Michael, and Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. “On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)”. Psychological methods 13.1 (2008): 49-57.

30 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models.
Hintz FA, Geiser C, Burns GL, Servera M., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 30923505
Trait and State Variance in Multi-Informant Assessments of ADHD and Academic Impairment in Spanish First-Grade Children.
Litson K, Geiser C, Burns GL, Servera M., J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 47(5), 2018
PMID: 26890535
In the Eye of the Beholder? Parent-Observer Discrepancies in Parenting and Child Disruptive Behavior Assessments.
Moens MA, Weeland J, Van der Giessen D, Chhangur RR, Overbeek G., J Abnorm Child Psychol 46(6), 2018
PMID: 29294209
Trait and state variance in oppositional defiant disorder symptoms: A multi-source investigation with Spanish children.
Preszler J, Burns GL, Litson K, Geiser C, Servera M., Psychol Assess 29(2), 2017
PMID: 27148784
A Multimethod Latent State-Trait Model for Structurally Different And Interchangeable Methods.
Koch T, Schultze M, Holtmann J, Geiser C, Eid M., Psychometrika 82(1), 2017
PMID: 27905055
Bayesian analysis of longitudinal multitrait-multimethod data with ordinal response variables.
Holtmann J, Koch T, Bohn J, Eid M., Br J Math Stat Psychol 70(1), 2017
PMID: 28116783
A Cross-Classified CFA-MTMM Model for Structurally Different and Nonindependent Interchangeable Methods.
Koch T, Schultze M, Jeon M, Nussbeck FW, Praetorius AK, Eid M., Multivariate Behav Res 51(1), 2016
PMID: 26881958
Does Acquiescence Affect Individual Items Consistently?
Kam CCS, Zhou M., Educ Psychol Meas 75(5), 2015
PMID: 29795840
Analyzing Statistical Mediation with Multiple Informants: A New Approach with an Application in Clinical Psychology.
Papa LA, Litson K, Lockhart G, Chassin L, Geiser C., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 26617536
Marital Conflict in Older Couples: Positivity, Personality, and Health.
Iveniuk J, Waite LJ, McClintock MK, Teidt AD., J Marriage Fam 76(1), 2014
PMID: 27274569
A longitudinal multilevel CFA-MTMM model for interchangeable and structurally different methods.
Koch T, Schultze M, Eid M, Geiser C., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 24860515
First Versus Second Order Latent Growth Curve Models: Some Insights From Latent State-Trait Theory.
Geiser C, Keller B, Lockhart G., Struct Equ Modeling 20(3), 2013
PMID: 24244087
The importance of modeling method effects: resolving the (uni)dimensionality of the loneliness questionnaire.
Ebesutani C, Drescher CF, Reise SP, Heiden L, Hight TL, Damon JD, Young J., J Pers Assess 94(2), 2012
PMID: 22339311
Interpreting the psychometric properties of the components of primary care instrument in an elderly population.
Aspy CB, Hamm RM, Schauf KJ, Mold JW, Flocke S., J Family Community Med 19(2), 2012
PMID: 22870416
Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths.
Grigorenko EL, Geiser C, Slobodskaya HR, Francis DJ., Psychol Assess 22(4), 2010
PMID: 21133549

References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 18331153
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar