Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall

Seegelke C (2015)
Frontiers in Psychology 6: 45.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
A large corpus of work demonstrates that observing other people's actions activates corresponding motor representations in the observer by running an internal simulation of the observed action. Recent evidence suggests that recalled action plans reflect a plan of how the observer would execute that action (based on the specific motor representation) rather than a plan of the actually observed action (based on the visual representation). This study examined whether people would recall an action plan based on a visual representation if the observed movement is biomechanically favorable for their own subsequent action. Participants performed an object manipulation task alongside a confederate. In the intra- individual task, the participant (or confederate) transported a plunger from an outer platform of fixed height to a center target platform located at different heights (home-to-target move), and then the same person transported the plunger back to the outer platform (target-back-to-home move). In the inter-individual task, the sequence was split between the two persons such that the participant (or confederate) performed the home-to-target move and the other person performed the target-back-to-home move. Importantly, the confederate always grasped the plunger at the same height. This grasp height was designated such that if participants would copy the action (i.e., grasp the object at the same height) it would place the participant's arm in a comfortable position at the end of the target-back-to-home move (i.e., end-state comfort). Results show that participants' grasp height was inversely related to center target height and similar regardless of direction (home-to-target vs. target-back-to-home move) and task (intra- vs. inter-individual). In addition, during the inter-individual task, participant's target-back-to-home grasp height was correlated with their own, but not with the confederate's grasp height during the home-to-target moves. These findings provide evidence that observing actions that are biomechanically favorable for subsequent action execution does not influence action plan recall processes.
Stichworte
action observation; grasping; motor planning; end-state comfort; imitation; action simulation; representation
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
6
Art.-Nr.
45
eISSN
1664-1078
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2720075

Zitieren

Seegelke C. Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6: 45.
Seegelke, C. (2015). Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 45. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00045
Seegelke, C. (2015). Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall. Frontiers in Psychology 6:45.
Seegelke, C., 2015. Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 45.
C. Seegelke, “Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015, : 45.
Seegelke, C.: Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, : 45 (2015).
Seegelke, Christian. “Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall”. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015): 45.

1 Zitation in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901

36 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.
Ansuini C, Giosa L, Turella L, Altoe G, Castiello U., Exp Brain Res 185(1), 2007
PMID: 17909766
Sex differences in cooperation: a meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.
Balliet D, Li NP, Macfarlan SJ, Van Vugt M., Psychol Bull 137(6), 2011
PMID: 21910518
Early and late motor responses to action observation.
Barchiesi G, Cattaneo L., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8(6), 2012
PMID: 22563004
Players of Matching Pennies automatically imitate opponents' gestures against strong incentives.
Belot M, Crawford VP, Heyes C., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(8), 2013
PMID: 23382227
Automatic imitation in a strategic context: players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents' gestures.
Cook R, Bird G, Lunser G, Huck S, Heyes C., Proc. Biol. Sci. 279(1729), 2011
PMID: 21775334
Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method.
Cosineau D.., 2005
Categorization and validation of handedness using latent class analysis.
Dragovic M., Acta Neuropsychiatr 16(4), 2004
PMID: 26984309
Action plans used in action observation.
Flanagan JR, Johansson RS., Nature 424(6950), 2003
PMID: 12917683
Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.
Gallese V, Goldman A., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 2(12), 1998
PMID: 21227300
Rational imitation in preverbal infants.
Gergely G, Bekkering H, Kiraly I., Nature 415(6873), 2002
PMID: 11845198
Teleological reasoning in infancy: the nai;ve theory of rational action.
Gergely G, Csibra G., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 7(7), 2003
PMID: 12860186
Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others.
Grafton ST., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1156(), 2009
PMID: 19338505
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Psychol Bull 138(5), 2012
PMID: 22448912
Grasping movement plans.
Rosenbaum DA, Halloran ES, Cohen RG., Psychon Bull Rev 13(5), 2006
PMID: 17328395
Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control.
Rosenbaum D., Jorgensen M.., 1992
“Contraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grips,” in
Jeannerod M.., 1990
When emulation becomes reciprocity.
Sartori L, Bucchioni G, Castiello U., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8(6), 2012
PMID: 22490925
From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions.
Sartori L, Cavallo A, Bucchioni G, Castiello U., Soc Neurosci 7(2), 2011
PMID: 21777110
How objects are grasped: the interplay between affordances and end-goals.
Sartori L, Straulino E, Castiello U., PLoS ONE 6(9), 2011
PMID: 21980396
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.
Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 228(4), 2013
PMID: 23727830
Motor control strategies in a continuous task space.
Schütz C., Weigelt M., Oderken D., Klein-Soetebier T., Schack T.., 2011
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998
Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control.
van der Wel RP, Fleckenstein RM, Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(5), 2007
PMID: 17924811
Moving and memorizing: motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall.
Weigelt M, Rosenbaum DA, Huelshorst S, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 132(1), 2009
PMID: 19591968
A Fortran package for generalized, crossvalidatory spline smoothing and differentiation.
Woltring H.., 1986

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25688223
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar