The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task

Seegelke C, Hughes C, Knoblauch A, Schack T (2015)
Experimental Brain Research 233(2): 529-538.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
The present experiment examined the influence of final target position on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task in which the required object orientation at the first target position was unconstrained. Participants grasped a cylindrical object from a home position, placed it at an intermediate position in a freely chosen orientation, and subsequently placed it at one of four final target positions. Considerable inter-individual differences in initial grasp selection were observed which also led to differences in final grasp postures. Whereas some participants strongly adjusted their initial grasp postures to the final target orientation, and thus showed a preference for end-state comfort, other participants showed virtually no adjustment in initial grasp postures, hence satisfying initial-state comfort. Interestingly, as intermediate grasp postures were similar regardless of initial grasp adjustment, intermediate-state comfort was prioritized by all participants. These results provide further evidence for the interaction of multiple action selection constraints in grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks. Whereas some constraints may take strict precedence in a given task, other constraints may be more flexible and weighted differently among participants. This differentiated weighting leads to task- and subject-specific constraint hierarchies and is reflected in inter-individual differences in grasp selection.
Stichworte
Action selection; Inter-individual differences; Motor planning; Grasping; End-state comfort; Multi-segment sequences
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Zeitschriftentitel
Experimental Brain Research
Band
233
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
529-538
ISSN
0014-4819
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2720069

Zitieren

Seegelke C, Hughes C, Knoblauch A, Schack T. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research. 2015;233(2):529-538.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., & Schack, T. (2015). The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), 529-538. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4133-4
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., and Schack, T. (2015). The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research 233, 529-538.
Seegelke, C., et al., 2015. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research, 233(2), p 529-538.
C. Seegelke, et al., “The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task”, Experimental Brain Research, vol. 233, 2015, pp. 529-538.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., Schack, T.: The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task. Experimental Brain Research. 233, 529-538 (2015).
Seegelke, Christian, Hughes, Charmayne, Knoblauch, Andreas, and Schack, Thomas. “The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task”. Experimental Brain Research 233.2 (2015): 529-538.

2 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Habit outweighs planning in grasp selection for object manipulation.
Herbort O, Mathew H, Kunde W., Cogn Psychol 92(), 2017
PMID: 27951435

32 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


KM, Astron J 108(), 1994
The influence of predicted arm biomechanics on decision making.
Cos I, Belanger N, Cisek P., J. Neurophysiol. 105(6), 2011
PMID: 21451055
The modulatory influence of end-point controllability on decisions between actions.
Cos I, Medleg F, Cisek P., J. Neurophysiol. 108(6), 2012
PMID: 22773776

M, Acta Neuropsychiatr 16(), 2004
The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection.
Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM., Res Q Exerc Sport 74(1), 2003
PMID: 12659472
Coordination of hand aperture with the spatial path of hand transport.
Haggard P, Wing A., Exp Brain Res 118(2), 1998
PMID: 9547099
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.
Harris CM, Wolpert DM., Nature 394(6695), 1998
PMID: 9723616
Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.
Hesse C, Deubel H., J. Neurophysiol. 104(1), 2010
PMID: 20457862
An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements.
Hogan N., J. Neurosci. 4(11), 1984
PMID: 6502203

N, Trends Neurosci 10(), 1987
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
Hughes CM, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH., Exp Brain Res 211(2), 2011
PMID: 21484393
Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P, Schutz C., Exp Brain Res 219(3), 2012
PMID: 22562588
Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Spiegel MA, Oehmichen C, Hammes J, Schack T., PLoS ONE 7(9), 2012
PMID: 22970119

J, J Bone Jt Surg 38 B(), 1956

DA, 1990

DA, Acta Psychol 94(), 1996
Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping.
Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RJ, Vaughan J, Jansen C., Psychol Rev 108(4), 2001
PMID: 11699114
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Psychol Bull 138(5), 2012
PMID: 22448912

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Prospective coding in event representation.
Schutz-Bosbach S, Prinz W., Cogn Process 8(2), 2007
PMID: 17406917
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998

C, Acta Psychol 144(), 2013
Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
Stockel T, Hughes CM, Schack T., Psychol Res 76(6), 2011
PMID: 22075763
Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
van der Wel RP, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 205(3), 2010
PMID: 20658129
The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics.
Wilson M, Knoblich G., Psychol Bull 131(3), 2005
PMID: 15869341

HJ, Adv Eng Softw Workst 8(), 1986

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25370347
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar