Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?
Johannsen K, de Ruiter J (2013)
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 667.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Autor*in
Einrichtung
Abstract / Bemerkung
We investigate effects of priming and preference on frame of reference (FOR) selection in dialog. In a first study, we determine FOR preferences for specific object configurations to establish a baseline. In a second study, we focus on the selection of the relative or the intrinsic FOR in dialog using the same stimuli and addressing the questions whether (a) interlocutors prime each other to use the same FOR consistently or (b) the preference for the intrinsic FOR predominates priming effects. Our results show effects of priming (more use of the relative FOR) and a decreased preference for the intrinsic FOR. However, as FOR selection did not have an effect on target trial accuracy, neither effect alone represents the key to successful communication in this domain. Rather, we found that successful communication depended on the adaptation of strategies between interlocutors: the more the interlocutors adapted to each other’s strategies, the more successful they were.
Erscheinungsjahr
2013
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Band
7
Seite(n)
667
ISSN
1662-5161
eISSN
1662-5161
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2606862
Zitieren
Johannsen K, de Ruiter J. Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7:667.
Johannsen, K., & de Ruiter, J. (2013). Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 667. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00667
Johannsen, Katrin, and de Ruiter, Jan. 2013. “Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 667.
Johannsen, K., and de Ruiter, J. (2013). Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, 667.
Johannsen, K., & de Ruiter, J., 2013. Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, p 667.
K. Johannsen and J. de Ruiter, “Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, 2013, pp. 667.
Johannsen, K., de Ruiter, J.: Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7, 667 (2013).
Johannsen, Katrin, and de Ruiter, Jan. “Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013): 667.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:18:16Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
3816a2ebd69a62b7d1f3934a0d282b9c
1 Zitation in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Perspective taking: building a neurocognitive framework for integrating the "social" and the "spatial".
Hamilton AF, Kessler K, Creem-Regehr SH., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24966824
Hamilton AF, Kessler K, Creem-Regehr SH., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24966824
39 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39.
Bates D., Maechler M., Boker B.., 2011
Bates D., Maechler M., Boker B.., 2011
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.
Brennan SE, Clark HH., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(6), 1996
PMID: 8921603
Brennan SE, Clark HH., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(6), 1996
PMID: 8921603
“Von dir aus⋯”. Zur hörerbezogenen Referenz. Bericht Nr. 10, Arbeiten der Forschergruppe “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”, Heidelberg/Mannheim.
Bürkle B., Nirmaier H., Herrmann T.., 1986
Bürkle B., Nirmaier H., Herrmann T.., 1986
Selecting a reference frame.
Carlson L.., 1999
Carlson L.., 1999
Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language.
Carlson LA, Van Deman SR., Cognition 106(1), 2007
PMID: 17449023
Carlson LA, Van Deman SR., Cognition 106(1), 2007
PMID: 17449023
Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above?
Carlson-Radvansky LA, Irwin DE., Cognition 46(3), 1993
PMID: 8462273
Carlson-Radvansky LA, Irwin DE., Cognition 46(3), 1993
PMID: 8462273
The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection.
Carlson-Radvansky L., Radvansky G.., 1996
Carlson-Radvansky L., Radvansky G.., 1996
Clark H.., 1996
The interplay between gesture and speech in the production of referring expressions: investigating the tradeoff hypothesis.
de Ruiter JP, Bangerter A, Dings P., Top Cogn Sci 4(2), 2012
PMID: 22389109
de Ruiter JP, Bangerter A, Dings P., Top Cogn Sci 4(2), 2012
PMID: 22389109
Listeners invest in an assumed other's perspective despite cognitive cost.
Duran ND, Dale R, Kreuz RJ., Cognition 121(1), 2011
PMID: 21752357
Duran ND, Dale R, Kreuz RJ., Cognition 121(1), 2011
PMID: 21752357
The development of children's knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction.
Flavell JH., Am Psychol 41(4), 1986
PMID: 3717749
Flavell JH., Am Psychol 41(4), 1986
PMID: 3717749
Searching imagined environments.
Franklin N., Tversky B.., 1990
Franklin N., Tversky B.., 1990
Spatial reference in weightlessness: perceptual factors and mental representations.
Friederici AD, Levelt WJ., Percept Psychophys 47(3), 1990
PMID: 2326148
Friederici AD, Levelt WJ., Percept Psychophys 47(3), 1990
PMID: 2326148
The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions.
Galati M., Michael C., Mello C., Greenauer N., Avraamides M.., 2013
Galati M., Michael C., Mello C., Greenauer N., Avraamides M.., 2013
Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination.
Garrod S, Anderson A., Cognition 27(2), 1987
PMID: 3691025
Garrod S, Anderson A., Cognition 27(2), 1987
PMID: 3691025
Factors affecting the use of dimensional prepositions in German and American English: object orientation, social context, and prepositional pattern.
Grabowski J., Miller G.., 2000
Grabowski J., Miller G.., 2000
Zur sekundären Raumreferenz: Gegenüberobjekte bei nicht-kanonischer Betrachterposition. Bericht Nr. 11, Arbeiten aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 245 “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”
Graf R., Herrmann T.., 1989
Graf R., Herrmann T.., 1989
“Logic and conversation,” in
Grice H.., 1975
Grice H.., 1975
Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
Haywood SL, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP., Psychol Sci 16(5), 2005
PMID: 15869694
Haywood SL, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP., Psychol Sci 16(5), 2005
PMID: 15869694
Partnerbezogene Objektlokalisation – ein neues sprachpsychologisches Forschungsthema. Arbeiten der Forschergruppe “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”, Bericht Nr.
Herrmann T.., 1988
Herrmann T.., 1988
The role of scene type and priming in the processing and selection of a spatial frame of reference.
Johannsen K, De Ruiter JP., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23596435
Johannsen K, De Ruiter JP., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23596435
The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions.
Kessler K, Rutherford H., Front Psychol 1(), 2010
PMID: 21833268
Kessler K, Rutherford H., Front Psychol 1(), 2010
PMID: 21833268
“Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms,” in
Levelt W.., 1982
Levelt W.., 1982
Speaking: From Intentions to Articulation.
Levelt W.., 1989
Levelt W.., 1989
“Some perceptual limitations on talking about space,” in
Levelt W.., 1984
Levelt W.., 1984
“Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: crosslinguistic evidence,” in
Levinson S.., 1996
Levinson S.., 1996
Levinson S.., 2003
Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought.
Linde C., Labov W.., 1975
Linde C., Labov W.., 1975
“A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations,” in
Logan G., Sadler D.., 1996
Logan G., Sadler D.., 1996
Language and Perception.
Miller G., Johnson-Laird P.., 1976
Miller G., Johnson-Laird P.., 1976
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering MJ, Garrod S., Behav Brain Sci 27(2), 2004
PMID: 15595235
Pickering MJ, Garrod S., Behav Brain Sci 27(2), 2004
PMID: 15595235
Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects, and with binomial data.
Quené H., van H.., 2008
Quené H., van H.., 2008
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
“Could you hand me those keys on the right?” Disentangling spatial reference frames using different methodologies.
Taylor H., Naylor S., Faust R., Holcomb P.., 1999
Taylor H., Naylor S., Faust R., Holcomb P.., 1999
“Spatial perspective in descriptions,” in
Tversky B.., 1996
Tversky B.., 1996
“Alignment of reference frames in dialogue,” in
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2004
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2004
“An empirical investigation into spatial reference frame taxonomy using dialogue,” in
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2006
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2006
Exploiting spatial descriptions in visual scene analysis.
Ziegler L, Johannsen K, Swadzba A, De Ruiter JP, Wachsmuth S., Cogn Process 13 Suppl 1(), 2012
PMID: 22806654
Ziegler L, Johannsen K, Swadzba A, De Ruiter JP, Wachsmuth S., Cogn Process 13 Suppl 1(), 2012
PMID: 22806654
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 24137122
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in
Google Scholar