How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups
Eyssel FA, Ribas X (2012)
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 15(6): 804-812.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Eyssel, Friederike AnneUniBi
;
Ribas, Xanthula
![](https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/images/icon_orcid.png)
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie > Arbeitseinheit 15 - Angewandte Sozialpsychologie und Geschlechterforschung
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie > Arbeitseinheit 05 - Sozialpsychologie und experimentalpsychologische Genderforschung
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie > Arbeitseinheit 05 - Sozialpsychologie und experimentalpsychologische Genderforschung
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Abstract / Bemerkung
According to infrahumanization theory, people ascribe outgroups lesser humanity than their ingroup. Infrahumanization has been proposed as a relatively subtle and indirect form of emotional prejudice. We tested this assumption further in an experiment during which participants were asked to take on the perspective of a prejudiced or a nonprejudiced person or received no such instruction before completing a questionnaire that included measures of dehumanization and explicit prejudice. Results showed that whereas the infrahumanization effect was unbiased by faking instructions, participants readily faked their responses on the more direct measure of prejudice. The results support the notion that infrahumanization represents a rather indirect form of discrimination that is less prone to social desirability tendencies than other self-report measures of prejudice. Moreover, our findings point to the importance of emotion valence in the context of infrahumanizing others. Implications of our findings will be disussed.
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Zeitschriftentitel
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
Band
15
Ausgabe
6
Seite(n)
804-812
ISSN
1368-4302
eISSN
1461-7188
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2425853
Zitieren
Eyssel FA, Ribas X. How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2012;15(6):804-812.
Eyssel, F. A., & Ribas, X. (2012). How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(6), 804-812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212447204
Eyssel, Friederike Anne, and Ribas, Xanthula. 2012. “How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups”. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 15 (6): 804-812.
Eyssel, F. A., and Ribas, X. (2012). How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 15, 804-812.
Eyssel, F.A., & Ribas, X., 2012. How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(6), p 804-812.
F.A. Eyssel and X. Ribas, “How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups”, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 15, 2012, pp. 804-812.
Eyssel, F.A., Ribas, X.: How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 15, 804-812 (2012).
Eyssel, Friederike Anne, and Ribas, Xanthula. “How to be good (or bad): On the fakeability of dehumanization and prejudice against outgroups”. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 15.6 (2012): 804-812.
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Suchen in