Gnosis

Kracht M (2011)
Journal of Philosophical Logic 40(3): 397-420.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
The transition from form to meaning is not neatly layered: there is no point where form ends and content sets in. Rather, there is an almost continuous process that converts form into meaning. That process cannot always take a straight line. Very often we hit barriers in our mind, due to the inability to understand the exact content of the sentence just heard. The standard division between formula and interpretation (or value) should therefore be given up when talking about the process of understanding. Interestingly, when we do this it turns out that there are 'easy' formulae, those we can understand without further help, and 'difficult' ones, which we cannot.
Stichworte
Judgement; Logic; Dynamic semantics
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Philosophical Logic
Band
40
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
397-420
ISSN
0022-3611
eISSN
1573-0433
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2289549

Zitieren

Kracht M. Gnosis. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2011;40(3):397-420.
Kracht, M. (2011). Gnosis. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(3), 397-420. doi:10.1007/s10992-010-9156-0
Kracht, M. (2011). Gnosis. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40, 397-420.
Kracht, M., 2011. Gnosis. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 40(3), p 397-420.
M. Kracht, “Gnosis”, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 40, 2011, pp. 397-420.
Kracht, M.: Gnosis. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40, 397-420 (2011).
Kracht, Marcus. “Gnosis”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40.3 (2011): 397-420.