The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences
Cruse H (2001)
In: Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Machamer PK, Grush R, McLaughlin P (Eds); Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press: 138-154.
Sammelwerksbeitrag
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Herausgeber*in
Machamer, Peter K.;
Grush, Rick;
McLaughlin, Peter
Einrichtung
Erscheinungsjahr
2001
Buchtitel
Theory and Method in the Neurosciences
Serientitel
Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science
Seite(n)
138-154
ISBN
0-8229-4140-6
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1886088
Zitieren
Cruse H. The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences. In: Machamer PK, Grush R, McLaughlin P, eds. Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press; 2001: 138-154.
Cruse, H. (2001). The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences. In P. K. Machamer, R. Grush, & P. McLaughlin (Eds.), Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Theory and Method in the Neurosciences (pp. 138-154). Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
Cruse, Holk. 2001. “The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences”. In Theory and Method in the Neurosciences, ed. Peter K. Machamer, Rick Grush, and Peter McLaughlin, 138-154. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
Cruse, H. (2001). “The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences” in Theory and Method in the Neurosciences, Machamer, P. K., Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. eds. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science (Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press), 138-154.
Cruse, H., 2001. The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences. In P. K. Machamer, R. Grush, & P. McLaughlin, eds. Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 138-154.
H. Cruse, “The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences”, Theory and Method in the Neurosciences, P.K. Machamer, R. Grush, and P. McLaughlin, eds., Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science, Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2001, pp.138-154.
Cruse, H.: The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences. In: Machamer, P.K., Grush, R., and McLaughlin, P. (eds.) Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. p. 138-154. Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (2001).
Cruse, Holk. “The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences”. Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Ed. Peter K. Machamer, Rick Grush, and Peter McLaughlin. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2001. Pittsburgh-Konstanz series in the philosophy and history of science. 138-154.
Google Scholar
ISBN Suche