Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets

Albert NB, Weigelt M, Hazeltine E, Ivry RB (2007)
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(5): 1107-1116.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Albert, Neil B.; Weigelt, MatthiasUniBi; Hazeltine, Eliot; Ivry, Richard B.
Abstract / Bemerkung
Investigations of bimanual movements have shed considerable insight on the constraints underlying our ability to perform coordinated actions. One prominent limitation is evident when people are required to produce reaching movements in which the two trajectories are of different amplitudes and/or directions. This effect, however, is only obtained when the movements are cued symbolically (e.g., letters indicate target locations); these planning costs are absent when the target locations are directly cued (J. Diedrichsen, E. Hazeltine, S. Kennerley, & R. B. Ivry, 2001). The present experiments test whether the absence of planning costs under the latter condition is due to the perceptual similarity of the direct cues. The results demonstrate that measures of response planning and execution do not depend on the perceptual similarity of the direct cues. Limitations in our ability to perform distinct actions with the two hands appear to reflect interactions related to response selection involving the translation of symbolic cues into their associated movements rather than arise from interactions associated with perception, motor programming, and motor execution.
Stichworte
motor skills; psychomotor performance; coordination; perceptual motor coordination; reaction time
Erscheinungsjahr
2007
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Band
33
Ausgabe
5
Seite(n)
1107-1116
ISSN
0096-1523
eISSN
1939-1277
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1631754

Zitieren

Albert NB, Weigelt M, Hazeltine E, Ivry RB. Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2007;33(5):1107-1116.
Albert, N. B., Weigelt, M., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. B. (2007). Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1107-1116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1107
Albert, Neil B., Weigelt, Matthias, Hazeltine, Eliot, and Ivry, Richard B. 2007. “Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 (5): 1107-1116.
Albert, N. B., Weigelt, M., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R. B. (2007). Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33, 1107-1116.
Albert, N.B., et al., 2007. Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), p 1107-1116.
N.B. Albert, et al., “Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 33, 2007, pp. 1107-1116.
Albert, N.B., Weigelt, M., Hazeltine, E., Ivry, R.B.: Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 33, 1107-1116 (2007).
Albert, Neil B., Weigelt, Matthias, Hazeltine, Eliot, and Ivry, Richard B. “Target selection during bimanual reaching to direct cues is unaffected by the perceptual similarity of the targets”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33.5 (2007): 1107-1116.

9 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.
Schmitz L, Vesper C, Sebanz N, Knoblich G., Cognition 181(), 2018
PMID: 30142512
The impact of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on learning fine-motor sequences.
Shimizu RE, Wu AD, Samra JK, Knowlton BJ., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372(1711), 2017
PMID: 27872369
Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.
Blinch J, Cameron BD, Cressman EK, Franks IM, Carpenter MG, Chua R., Exp Brain Res 232(3), 2014
PMID: 24381087
The impact of perceptual, cognitive and motor factors on bimanual coordination.
Procacci NM, Stanford TR., Psychol Res 77(6), 2013
PMID: 23207692
Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P, Schütz C., Exp Brain Res 219(3), 2012
PMID: 22562588
Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.
Wenderoth N, Van Dooren M, Vandebroek A, De Vos J, Vangheluwe S, Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Swinnen SP., J Neurophysiol 102(1), 2009
PMID: 19369359
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 17924810
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar