Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria?

Peperkorn Y, Buschmann J-K, Schwedler S (2024)
Chemistry Education : Research and Practice .

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | E-Veröff. vor dem Druck | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Abstract / Bemerkung
Past research repeatedly revealed students' struggles to understand chemical equilibria, especially concerning their dynamic nature. Black-box simulations have proven to be helpful here. However, the effect is strongly dependent on the quality of teaching, the design principles of which are not yet fully known. One aspect of debate concerns the nature of supportive learning tasks, which require students to activate, construct and reflect on their mental models to foster conceptual understanding. In this paper, we investigate how drawing-assisted simulation-based learning promotes conceptual understanding of chemical equilibria in comparison to single-choice tasks. Both types of supporting tasks involve simulation-based activities according to the German instructional design SIMMS (Simulation-basedInstruction forMentalModelling inSchool), which requires students to construct their own explanations and predictions on a chemical system before exploring it via molecular dynamics simulations and revising their explanations and predictions retrospectively. In a quasi-experimental intervention study with 174 German high school students of ten chemistry courses (tenth grade), two treatment groups (drawing group and single-choice group) were compared with a control group, assessing the progress in conceptual understanding during simulation-based learning via drawings and explanations as well as pre- and post-intervention via questionnaire. Our findings reveal similar effects of drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice tasks on conceptual understanding of chemical equilibria. For equilibrium dynamics specifically, simulation-based settings featuring drawing tasks seem to be slightly more effective than simulation-based settings featuring elaborate single-choice-tasks in fostering understanding. What is more, simulation-based settings on the divergent phenomenon of Le Chatelier (where different final states emerge from the same initial state, depending on the nature of external perturbation) seem to be more efficient than those on the convergent nature of chemical equilibria (where several initial states with different educt/product ratios yield the same final state in equilibrium) in fostering student understanding irrespective of the mode of the supportive learning task.
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Zeitschriftentitel
Chemistry Education : Research and Practice
ISSN
1109-4028
eISSN
1756-1108
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2990397

Zitieren

Peperkorn Y, Buschmann J-K, Schwedler S. Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria? Chemistry Education : Research and Practice . 2024.
Peperkorn, Y., Buschmann, J. - K., & Schwedler, S. (2024). Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria? Chemistry Education : Research and Practice . https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00113j
Peperkorn, Yannik, Buschmann, Jana-Kim, and Schwedler, Stefanie. 2024. “Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria?”. Chemistry Education : Research and Practice .
Peperkorn, Y., Buschmann, J. - K., and Schwedler, S. (2024). Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria? Chemistry Education : Research and Practice .
Peperkorn, Y., Buschmann, J.-K., & Schwedler, S., 2024. Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria? Chemistry Education : Research and Practice .
Y. Peperkorn, J.-K. Buschmann, and S. Schwedler, “Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria?”, Chemistry Education : Research and Practice , 2024.
Peperkorn, Y., Buschmann, J.-K., Schwedler, S.: Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria? Chemistry Education : Research and Practice . (2024).
Peperkorn, Yannik, Buschmann, Jana-Kim, and Schwedler, Stefanie. “Comparing drawing tasks and elaborate single-choice questions in simulation-based learning: how do they facilitate students' conceptual understanding on chemical equilibria?”. Chemistry Education : Research and Practice (2024).
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar