New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement

Linke L, Horstmann G (2024)
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 1.97 MB
Abstract / Bemerkung
Perceiving direct gaze — the perception of being looked at — is important in everyday life. The gaze cone is a concept to define the area in which observers perceive gaze as direct. The most frequently used methods to measure direct gaze threshold fall into two broad groups: First, a variant of the method of constant stimuli, firstly introduced by Gibson and Pick (The American Journal of Psychology, 76, 386–394, 1963). Second, a variant of the method of adjustment, firstly introduced by Gamer and Hecht (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 705–715, 2007). Previous studies found a considerable range of thresholds, and although some influences on thresholds are already known (uncertainty, clinical groups), thresholds often vary for no apparent reason. Another important method is a triadic gaze-perception task, which usually finds triadic gaze direction judgments to be overestimated. In two experiments, we compare the method of adjustment with the method of constant stimuli. Experiment 1 additionally examines the influence of the overestimation effect found in the triadic task. Results indicate that thresholds are larger when measured by the method of adjustment than by constant stimuli. Furthermore, Experiment 1 finds a nonlinear overestimation factor, indicating that gaze directions near 0° are less overestimated than larger eccentricities. Correcting the thresholds with individually obtained overestimation factors widens the gaze cone but does not eliminate the average difference between the methods of adjustments and constant stimuli.
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Zeitschriftentitel
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
ISSN
1943-3921
eISSN
1943-393X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2989214

Zitieren

Linke L, Horstmann G. New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2024.
Linke, L., & Horstmann, G. (2024). New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02884-9
Linke, Linda, and Horstmann, Gernot. 2024. “New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement”. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Linke, L., and Horstmann, G. (2024). New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Linke, L., & Horstmann, G., 2024. New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
L. Linke and G. Horstmann, “New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement”, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2024.
Linke, L., Horstmann, G.: New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. (2024).
Linke, Linda, and Horstmann, Gernot. “New task–new results? How the gaze cone is influenced by the method of measurement”. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (2024).
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2024-05-10T06:11:09Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
78a5a98aeadaf2a4acf16c828037a963


Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Suchen in

Google Scholar