Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2

Tzvetkov NT, Peeva MI, Georgieva MG, Deneva V, Balacheva AA, Bogdanov IP, Ponticelli M, Milella L, Kirilov K, Matin M, Stammler H-G, et al. (2024)
Current Research in Biotechnology 7: 100176.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Tzvetkov, Nikolay T.; Peeva, Martina I.; Georgieva, Maya G.; Deneva, Vera; Balacheva, Aneliya A.; Bogdanov, Ivan P.; Ponticelli, Maria; Milella, Luigi; Kirilov, Kiril; Matin, Maima; Stammler, Hans-GeorgUniBi; Atanasov, Atanas G.
Alle
Abstract / Bemerkung
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still remains the most disastrous infection continuously affecting millions of people worldwide. Herein, we performed a comparative study between the anti-influenza drug favipiravir (FAV) and the anti-thalassemia drug deferiprone (DFP) in order to examine their potential as basic scaffolds for the generation of most effective and structurally novel antivirals. To conduct the initial molecular modelling and virtual screening steps, our recently proposed single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD)/HYdrogen DEssolvation (HYDE) technology platform has been used. This platform allows molecular design, interactive prioritization and virtual evaluation of newly designed molecules, simultaneously affecting two COVID-related targets, including angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a host-cellular receptor (host-based approach) and the main protease (Mpro) enzyme of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-Cov-2 (virus-based approach). Based on the molecular docking results, DFP has shown higher binding affinity (Ki HYDE values) over FAV towards both biological targets. The tautomeric, physicochemical, and biological properties of FAV and DFP have been studied both experimentally and theoretically using molecular spectroscopy (UV-VIS absorption), parallel artificial membrane permeability assay, and cell biology (PAMPA and MTT assay), as well as DFT quantum chemical calculations. According to the obtained results, the enol tautomers of both compounds are considerably more stable in different organic solvents. However, the keto tautomer of FAV was estimated to be most preferable under physiological conditions, which is in good agreement with the molecular docking studies. The isolated crystal structure of DFP is in an excellent agreement with the computation in respect of the most stable tautomer. Combined single X-ray/molecular modeling studies including HYDE analyses provided not only insights into the protein-ligand interactions within the binding site of SARS-Cov-2-ACE2 and SARS-Cov-2-Mpro, but also a valuable information regarding the most stable enol tautomeric form of DFP that contributes to its estimated higher potency against these targets.
Stichworte
Favipiravir; Deferiprone; Tautomer-based drug design; COVID-19; Molecular modelling; Tautomerism
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Zeitschriftentitel
Current Research in Biotechnology
Band
7
Art.-Nr.
100176
eISSN
2590-2628
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2987541

Zitieren

Tzvetkov NT, Peeva MI, Georgieva MG, et al. Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2. Current Research in Biotechnology. 2024;7: 100176.
Tzvetkov, N. T., Peeva, M. I., Georgieva, M. G., Deneva, V., Balacheva, A. A., Bogdanov, I. P., Ponticelli, M., et al. (2024). Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2. Current Research in Biotechnology, 7, 100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100176
Tzvetkov, Nikolay T., Peeva, Martina I., Georgieva, Maya G., Deneva, Vera, Balacheva, Aneliya A., Bogdanov, Ivan P., Ponticelli, Maria, et al. 2024. “Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2”. Current Research in Biotechnology 7: 100176.
Tzvetkov, N. T., Peeva, M. I., Georgieva, M. G., Deneva, V., Balacheva, A. A., Bogdanov, I. P., Ponticelli, M., Milella, L., Kirilov, K., Matin, M., et al. (2024). Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2. Current Research in Biotechnology 7:100176.
Tzvetkov, N.T., et al., 2024. Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2. Current Research in Biotechnology, 7: 100176.
N.T. Tzvetkov, et al., “Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2”, Current Research in Biotechnology, vol. 7, 2024, : 100176.
Tzvetkov, N.T., Peeva, M.I., Georgieva, M.G., Deneva, V., Balacheva, A.A., Bogdanov, I.P., Ponticelli, M., Milella, L., Kirilov, K., Matin, M., Stammler, H.-G., Atanasov, A.G., Antonov, L.: Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2. Current Research in Biotechnology. 7, : 100176 (2024).
Tzvetkov, Nikolay T., Peeva, Martina I., Georgieva, Maya G., Deneva, Vera, Balacheva, Aneliya A., Bogdanov, Ivan P., Ponticelli, Maria, Milella, Luigi, Kirilov, Kiril, Matin, Maima, Stammler, Hans-Georg, Atanasov, Atanas G., and Antonov, Liudmil. “Favipiravir vs. Deferiprone: Tautomeric, photophysical, in vitro biological studies, and binding interactions with SARS-Cov-2-MPro/ACE2”. Current Research in Biotechnology 7 (2024): 100176.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar