Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures
Mertens G, Braem S, Kuhn M, Lonsdorf T, van den Hout MA, Engelhard IM (2018)
Behaviour Research and Therapy 110: 41-46.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Mertens, Gaëtan;
Braem, Senne;
Kuhn, Manuel;
Lonsdorf, TinaUniBi;
van den Hout, Marcel A.;
Engelhard, Iris M.
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Zeitschriftentitel
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Band
110
Seite(n)
41-46
ISSN
00057967
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2985461
Zitieren
Mertens G, Braem S, Kuhn M, Lonsdorf T, van den Hout MA, Engelhard IM. Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2018;110:41-46.
Mertens, G., Braem, S., Kuhn, M., Lonsdorf, T., van den Hout, M. A., & Engelhard, I. M. (2018). Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 110, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003
Mertens, Gaëtan, Braem, Senne, Kuhn, Manuel, Lonsdorf, Tina, van den Hout, Marcel A., and Engelhard, Iris M. 2018. “Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures”. Behaviour Research and Therapy 110: 41-46.
Mertens, G., Braem, S., Kuhn, M., Lonsdorf, T., van den Hout, M. A., and Engelhard, I. M. (2018). Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy 110, 41-46.
Mertens, G., et al., 2018. Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 110, p 41-46.
G. Mertens, et al., “Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures”, Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 110, 2018, pp. 41-46.
Mertens, G., Braem, S., Kuhn, M., Lonsdorf, T., van den Hout, M.A., Engelhard, I.M.: Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 110, 41-46 (2018).
Mertens, Gaëtan, Braem, Senne, Kuhn, Manuel, Lonsdorf, Tina, van den Hout, Marcel A., and Engelhard, Iris M. “Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures”. Behaviour Research and Therapy 110 (2018): 41-46.
Google Scholar