From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching

Bergmans E, Billington A, Thies K-C (2023)
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 31(1): 80.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 1.41 MB
Autor*in
Bergmans, Elonka; Billington, Alistair; Thies, Karl-ChristianUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
BACKGROUND: This experimental study was performed to evaluate the role of blended learning for technical skill teaching on the European Trauma Course (ETC). While online modules are extensively used for theoretical teaching, their role in skills training remains less well explored. The ETC currently relies on the established 4-step technique for teaching technical skills. However, the required large cohort of skilled instructors and the time intensity prove increasingly challenging in a current climate of staff shortages and funding constraints. This study assesses if blended learning, combining pre-course online elements with face-to-face training matches the effectiveness of the traditional 4-step approach whilst being more time-efficient.; METHODS: In a randomised, multi-centre trial, the conventional face-to-face 4-step technique for teaching a skill of medium complexity, the application of a pelvic binder, was compared with an innovative blended approach. It was hypothesised that the blended approach was non-inferior for skill performance measured after the teaching session and after two days (skill retention) with the time needed for teaching and student/teacher satisfaction as secondary outcomes.; RESULTS: Ninety participants, divided into 44 traditional and 46 blended method students, were analysed. Independent-samples t-test showed no significant difference in performance scores and non-inferiority of the blended approach with a half of one standard deviation margin. A statistically significant difference in mean retention scores favored the blended approach. A Mann-Whitney U Test revealed no significant difference in candidate satisfaction levels but a statistically significant difference in instructors' satisfaction levels in favour of the blended approach. Analysis with Welch' t-test demonstrated that the face-to-face teaching time needed for the blended approach was significantly shorter (by 6 min).; CONCLUSIONS: The integration of a blended approach with the 4-step technique for teaching pelvic binder application in the ETC streamlined teaching without compromising skill acquisition quality. This innovative approach addresses traditional limitations and shows promise in adapting medical education to modern learning and teaching demands. We suggest that blended learning could also be applied for other skills taught on life support courses.; TRIAL REGISTRATION: University of Dundee (Schools of Medicine and Life sciences Research Ethics Committee, REC number 22/59, 28th June 2022). © 2023. The Author(s).
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Zeitschriftentitel
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Band
31
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
80
eISSN
1757-7241
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Universität Bielefeld im Rahmen des DEAL-Vertrags gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2984741

Zitieren

Bergmans E, Billington A, Thies K-C. From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine . 2023;31(1): 80.
Bergmans, E., Billington, A., & Thies, K. - C. (2023). From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine , 31(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01127-4
Bergmans, Elonka, Billington, Alistair, and Thies, Karl-Christian. 2023. “From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching”. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 31 (1): 80.
Bergmans, E., Billington, A., and Thies, K. - C. (2023). From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 31:80.
Bergmans, E., Billington, A., & Thies, K.-C., 2023. From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine , 31(1): 80.
E. Bergmans, A. Billington, and K.-C. Thies, “From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching”, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine , vol. 31, 2023, : 80.
Bergmans, E., Billington, A., Thies, K.-C.: From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine . 31, : 80 (2023).
Bergmans, Elonka, Billington, Alistair, and Thies, Karl-Christian. “From tradition to innovation: a comparison of the traditional 4-step approach versus a blended learning modification for technical skills teaching”. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 31.1 (2023): 80.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2024-02-23T08:24:31Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
7a9ef728b9628715b360510f55ec125d


Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 37964361
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar