Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods
Heinrichs N, Hofmann SG (2005)
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 34(1): 3-15.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Heinrichs, NinaUniBi
;
Hofmann, Stefan G.
![](https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/images/icon_orcid.png)
Abstract / Bemerkung
The goal of the present study was to compare 2 cognitive assessment methods for social anxiety: a thought listing and a self‐report method. The focus of this study was on the convergent and divergent validity of these methods using a multi‐trait multi‐method approach. Furthermore, treatment sensitivity was explored. Fifty‐eight patients with social phobia completed thought listings followed by 2 different social stress tasks before and after an exposure group treatment (n = 33), or following a waiting period (n = 25). One task consisted of speaking in front of 2 confederates while the other task involved initiating a conversation with an opposite‐sex confederate. Two questionnaires measuring positive and negative self‐statements regarding public speaking and social interactions were also completed. To compare the balance of positive and negative thoughts, the State of Mind ratio [positive thoughts/(positive+negative thoughts)] was calculated for both cognitive assessment methods. Results demonstrate that methods related to social interaction anxiety showed better convergent validity than methods related to public speaking anxiety; however, public speaking methods captured treatment effects better than methods related to social interaction anxiety. This study questions the common assumption that different cognitive assessment methods measure the same construct.
Erscheinungsjahr
2005
Zeitschriftentitel
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Band
34
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
3-15
ISSN
1650-6073
eISSN
1651-2316
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2981070
Zitieren
Heinrichs N, Hofmann SG. Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2005;34(1):3-15.
Heinrichs, N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2005). Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 34(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070410030106
Heinrichs, Nina, and Hofmann, Stefan G. 2005. “Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods”. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 34 (1): 3-15.
Heinrichs, N., and Hofmann, S. G. (2005). Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 34, 3-15.
Heinrichs, N., & Hofmann, S.G., 2005. Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 34(1), p 3-15.
N. Heinrichs and S.G. Hofmann, “Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods”, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, vol. 34, 2005, pp. 3-15.
Heinrichs, N., Hofmann, S.G.: Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 34, 3-15 (2005).
Heinrichs, Nina, and Hofmann, Stefan G. “Cognitive Assessment of Social Anxiety: a Comparison of Self‐report and Thought Listing Methods”. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 34.1 (2005): 3-15.
Link(s) zu Volltext(en)
Access Level
![Restricted access for author/reviewer only. Restricted](https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/images/access_restricted.png)