The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program
Heinrichs N (2006)
The Journal of Primary Prevention 27(4): 345-365.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Abstract / Bemerkung
This study experimentally manipulated two incentives for participation (monetary: paid participation for sessions and setting: group vs. individual) in a child behavior problem prevention program to analyze their effects on recruitment and retention of families. A population of 690 eligible families from 15 preschools located in socially disadvantaged neighborhoods was invited to participate in a parent training (PT) program. The study recruited parents by using advertisements that had information describing only the indicated condition (i.e., PT in group-unpaid, or PT individual-unpaid, or PT in group-paid, or PT individual-paid). Results demonstrate significant impact of payment on recruitment and initial attendance. Training setting alone (individual or group) did not significantly influence these rates.
Editors’ Strategic Implications: A compelling case is made for the utility of monetary incentives to increase proportions of low-income families in prevention research and programs. Evaluators and program designers should note the impressive use of the experimental design and hierarchical linear modeling to test the effects on recruitment.
Erscheinungsjahr
2006
Zeitschriftentitel
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Band
27
Ausgabe
4
Seite(n)
345-365
ISSN
0278-095X
eISSN
1573-6547
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2981067
Zitieren
Heinrichs N. The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 2006;27(4):345-365.
Heinrichs, N. (2006). The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(4), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-006-0038-8
Heinrichs, Nina. 2006. “The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program”. The Journal of Primary Prevention 27 (4): 345-365.
Heinrichs, N. (2006). The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program. The Journal of Primary Prevention 27, 345-365.
Heinrichs, N., 2006. The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 27(4), p 345-365.
N. Heinrichs, “The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program”, The Journal of Primary Prevention, vol. 27, 2006, pp. 345-365.
Heinrichs, N.: The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 27, 345-365 (2006).
Heinrichs, Nina. “The Effects of Two Different Incentives on Recruitment Rates of Families into a Prevention Program”. The Journal of Primary Prevention 27.4 (2006): 345-365.
Link(s) zu Volltext(en)
Access Level
Closed Access