Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution
Rappelt L, Held S, Wiedemann T, Deutsch J, Hochstrate J, Wicker P, Donath L (2023)
Frontiers in Physiology 14: 1134778.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
![Open access file OA](https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/images/access_open.png)
Autor*in
Rappelt, L.;
Held, S.;
Wiedemann, T.;
Deutsch, J.;
Hochstrate, J.;
Wicker, PamelaUniBi;
Donath, L.
Abstract / Bemerkung
Introduction: Low-intensity endurance training is frequently performed at
gradually higher training intensities than intended, resulting in a shift towards
threshold training. By restricting oral breathing and only allowing for nasal
breathing this shift might be reduced.
Methods: Nineteen physically healthy adults (3 females, age: 26.5 ± 5.1 years;
height: 1.77 ± 0.08 m; body mass: 77.3 ± 11.4 kg; VO2peak: 53.4 ±
6.6 mL·kg−1 min−1) performed 60 min of self-selected, similar (144.7 ± 56.3 vs.
147.0 ± 54.2 W, p = 0.60) low-intensity cycling with breathing restriction (nasalonly
breathing) and without restrictions (oro-nasal breathing). During these
sessions heart rate, respiratory gas exchange data and power output data were
recorded continuously.
Results: Total ventilation (p < 0.001, ηp
2 = 0.45), carbon dioxide release (p = 0.02,
ηp
2 = 0.28), oxygen uptake (p = 0.03, ηp
2 = 0.23), and breathing frequency (p =
0.01, ηp
2 = 0.35) were lower during nasal-only breathing. Furthermore, lower
capillary blood lactate concentrations were found towards the end of the training
session during nasal-only breathing (time x condition-interaction effect: p = 0.02,
ηp
2 = 0.17). Even though discomfort was rated marginally higher during nasal-only
breathing (p = 0.03, ηp
2 = 0.24), ratings of perceived effort did not differ between
the two conditions (p ≥ 0.06, ηp
2 = 0.01). No significant “condition” differences
were found for intensity distribution (time spent in training zone quantified by
power output and heart rate) (p ≥ 0.24, ηp
2 ≤ 0.07).
Conclusion: Nasal-only breathing seems to be associated with possible
physiological changes that may help to maintain physical health in endurance
athletes during low intensity endurance training. However, it did not prevent
participants from performing low-intensity training at higher intensities than
intended. Longitudinal studies are warranted to evaluate longitudinal responses
of changes in breathing patterns.
Stichworte
TID;
ventilatory LiT;
endurance;
rating of perceived exertion;
heart rate;
blood lactate;
power
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Physiology
Band
14
Art.-Nr.
1134778
Urheberrecht / Lizenzen
eISSN
1664-042X
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2977976
Zitieren
Rappelt L, Held S, Wiedemann T, et al. Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution. Frontiers in Physiology. 2023;14: 1134778.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Wiedemann, T., Deutsch, J., Hochstrate, J., Wicker, P., & Donath, L. (2023). Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution. Frontiers in Physiology, 14, 1134778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1134778
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Wiedemann, T., Deutsch, J., Hochstrate, J., Wicker, Pamela, and Donath, L. 2023. “Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution”. Frontiers in Physiology 14: 1134778.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Wiedemann, T., Deutsch, J., Hochstrate, J., Wicker, P., and Donath, L. (2023). Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution. Frontiers in Physiology 14:1134778.
Rappelt, L., et al., 2023. Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution. Frontiers in Physiology, 14: 1134778.
L. Rappelt, et al., “Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution”, Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 14, 2023, : 1134778.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Wiedemann, T., Deutsch, J., Hochstrate, J., Wicker, P., Donath, L.: Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution. Frontiers in Physiology. 14, : 1134778 (2023).
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Wiedemann, T., Deutsch, J., Hochstrate, J., Wicker, Pamela, and Donath, L. “Restricted nasal-only breathing during self-selected low intensity training does not affect training intensity distribution”. Frontiers in Physiology 14 (2023): 1134778.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Name
fphys-14-1134778.pdf
898.71 KB
Access Level
![Open access file OA](https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/images/access_open.png)
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2023-05-08T09:49:41Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
134bfe64aabfadb65046968406fc5645
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 37153227
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in