<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2969671">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2969671"/>
        <dc:title>Specters of Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Student Movement and its evocation of the ‘National Question’ during the global-local long Sixties</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person rdf:about="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/person/89379729">
                <foaf:name>Dirirsa, Sisay</foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname>Dirirsa</foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname>Sisay</foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>This dissertation seeks to examine the category of Itəyoṕəya’winətə (being Ethiopian) 
by drawing on the logic of radical alterity. Focusing on the constitutive moment of the 
modern Ethiopian empire state during the late nineteenth century, the dissertation
problematizes the story of Ethiopian modernity as part and parcel of the ambivalence of 
modernity at a global scale. The dissertation discusses how the hegemonic notion of 
Itəyoṕəya’winətə was simultaneously professed as a modernization process in order to 
dislodge Ethiopia from its ‘traditional past’ and then willy-nilly imposed upon a number of 
subjugated peoples of the historic realm of the Ethiopian empire–– such as the Oromo, the 
Wolaita, the Sidama, the Somali societies––under the banner of a universal ‘civilizing 
mission.’ &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to conventional postcolonial/de-colonial discourses that tend to flatten the 
ambivalence of modernity as if the dichotomy between the hegemonic presence of modern 
Europe and the marginalization of the ‘Third World’/ ‘subaltern,’ this dissertation focuses on 
a multidimensional historical plane in pursuit of capturing manifold centers of hegemony in a 
global local scale. The main purpose of the current dissertation is, therefore, to valorize the 
inherent ambivalence of modernity qua colonization by highlighting the liminality of the 
modern Ethiopian empire state, while simultaneously being a center of hegemony and a 
periphery of the global-local phenomena of modernity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Itəyoṕəya’winətə was essentially constituted by the hegemonic presence of modern 
Europe during the nineteenth century, thus generating an inherent craving in pursuit of 
becoming modern Europe among the hegemonic habäša(Abyssinians) elites of modern 
Ethiopian empire state. After imitating modern Europe’s self-image as the quintessence of 
humanity, along with the rationalization of its colonial violence à la “civilizing mission,” the 
modern Ethiopian empire state has been construed, in the chronicles of the Ethiopian great 
tradition, as if it were the ‘Europe of black Africa.’ Copying from the hegemonic self-image 
of modern Europe, Itəyoṕəya’winətə has essentially been construed in negation to the 
category of blackness and Africanness. Assuming the role of an imposter, i.e., imitating the 
hegemony of modem Europe, the modern Ethiopian empire state reduced numerous 
inhabitants of its historic South realm into the category of “subhuman,” thus legitimatizing its 
colonial/imperial violence as a “civilizing mission.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As much as Itəyoṕəya’winətə has been constituted and sustained by the hegemonic 
Ethiopian great tradition, the Ethiopian Student Movement (ESM) gave birth to a counter 
tradition during the long Sixties. The long Sixties is developed and deployed inside the 
current dissertation as a heuristic devise in order to understand the historicity of ESM from a 
broader intellectual milieu, namely the anti-colonial global-local moment of historical 
synchronicity, c. 1950s-1970s. Drawing on ESM’s debate on the concept of the “national 
question,” i.e., the application of the principle of the right to national self-determination––
including the right to secede––in Ethiopia, which were published in various periodicals 
belonging to ESM during the long Sixties, the dissertation seeks to resonate ESM’s critical 
engagement with the category of Itəyoṕəya’winətə. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, the dissertation is inspired by Reinhart Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte 
and Jacques Derrida’s différance. After initially departing from Koselleck’s 
Begriffsgeschichte in order to posit an elastic notion of temporality, thus being able to engage 
with the conventional empiricist notion of history (focusing on the one-dimensional reduction 
of the past as an object of historical inquiry), the dissertation embarks on an ambitious 
endeavor in pursuit of positing an inherently open temporality. Capitalizing on Derrida’s 
notion of différance and Ethan Kleinberg’s notion of “Constitutive Dissymmetry,” the 
dissertation seeks to advance a multidimensional notion of history.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; 
Eventually, the dissertation concludes by reimagining the possibility of Addisitwu’a 
Itəyoṕəya (the new Ethiopia) by drawing on ESM’s anticipation of Addisitwu’a Itəyoṕəya as a 
utopian dream of salvation for the historical(and actual) problems of Itəyoṕəya’winətə. After 
taking a clue from a local eschatological tradition, namely “səmən’täñña ši (the eight 
millennium),” the conclusion also aspires to warn the principal actors of the present-day 
Ethiopia concerning the impossibility of Addisitwu’a Itəyoṕəya, i.e., the possibility of 
Ethiopia becoming the next Somalia, Libya, Yemen, or Syria.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:startPage>559</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>559</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>Universität Bielefeld</dc:publisher>
        <fabio:hasPublishingYear>2023</fabio:hasPublishingYear>
        <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
        <ore:aggregates rdf:resource="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2969671/2969672/Dirrisa%20_Sisay%20M_The%20Dissertation.pdf"/>
        <dc:identifier rdf:resource="urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29696713"/>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.4119/unibi/2969671" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.4119/unibi/2969671"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
