Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?

Aramaki J, Effendy I, Happle R, Kawana S, Löffler C, Löffler H (2001)
Contact Dermatitis 45(5): 286-290.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Aramaki, J; Effendy, IsaakUniBi ; Happle, R; Kawana, S; Löffler, C; Löffler, H
Abstract / Bemerkung
For testing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutaneous blood flow with laser Doppler (LD) are considered to be the most reliable methods. The aim of this study was to determine which method of measurement should be preferred when conducting SLS testing under varying conditions. Patch testing with SLS at different concentrations and exposure times was performed. TEWL values were compared with those of LD. TEWL values showed distinct changes at low SLS concentrations and short application periods. By contrast, higher SLS concentrations were necessary to increase LD values. Short application of patches changed TEWL rather than LD values. When evaluating SLS patch testing by bioengineering methods, TEWL measurement appears to be more suitable for a test procedure that provokes mild skin reactions (SLS concentration <1%), whereas LD measurement is more appropriate to evaluate pronounced skin reactions (SLS concentration greater than or equal to1%).
Stichworte
transepidermal water loss; cutaneous blood flow; laser Doppler; flowmetry; bioengineering methods; barrier disruption
Erscheinungsjahr
2001
Zeitschriftentitel
Contact Dermatitis
Band
45
Ausgabe
5
Seite(n)
286-290
ISSN
0105-1873
eISSN
1600-0536
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2968802

Zitieren

Aramaki J, Effendy I, Happle R, Kawana S, Löffler C, Löffler H. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis . 2001;45(5):286-290.
Aramaki, J., Effendy, I., Happle, R., Kawana, S., Löffler, C., & Löffler, H. (2001). Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis , 45(5), 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450506.x
Aramaki, J, Effendy, Isaak, Happle, R, Kawana, S, Löffler, C, and Löffler, H. 2001. “Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?”. Contact Dermatitis 45 (5): 286-290.
Aramaki, J., Effendy, I., Happle, R., Kawana, S., Löffler, C., and Löffler, H. (2001). Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis 45, 286-290.
Aramaki, J., et al., 2001. Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis , 45(5), p 286-290.
J. Aramaki, et al., “Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?”, Contact Dermatitis , vol. 45, 2001, pp. 286-290.
Aramaki, J., Effendy, I., Happle, R., Kawana, S., Löffler, C., Löffler, H.: Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate? Contact Dermatitis . 45, 286-290 (2001).
Aramaki, J, Effendy, Isaak, Happle, R, Kawana, S, Löffler, C, and Löffler, H. “Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?”. Contact Dermatitis 45.5 (2001): 286-290.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 11722488
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar