Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe

Eckert S, Herden J, Stift M, Joshi J, van Kleunen M (2021)
Molecular Ecology 30(1): 222-236.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Eckert, SilviaUniBi; Herden, Jasmin; Stift, Marc; Joshi, Jasmin; van Kleunen, Mark
Abstract / Bemerkung
Invasive species frequently differentiate phenotypically in novel environments within a few generations, often even with limited genetic variation. For the invasive plants Solidago canadensis and S. gigantea, we tested whether such differentiation might have occurred through heritable epigenetic changes in cytosine methylation. In a 2-year common-garden experiment, we grew plants from seeds collected along a latitudinal gradient in their non-native Central European range to test for trait differentiation and whether differentiation disappeared when seeds were treated with the demethylation agent zebularine. Microsatellite markers revealed no population structure along the latitudinal gradient in S. canadensis, but three genetic clusters in S. gigantea. Solidago canadensis showed latitudinal clines in flowering phenology and growth. In S. gigantea, the number of clonal offspring decreased with latitude. Although zebularine had a significant effect on early growth, probably through effects on cytosine methylation, latitudinal clines remained (or even got stronger) in plants raised from seeds treated with zebularine. Thus, our experiment provides no evidence that epigenetic mechanisms by selective cytosine methylation contribute to the observed phenotypic differentiation in invasive goldenrods in Central Europe.
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Zeitschriftentitel
Molecular Ecology
Band
30
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
222-236
ISSN
0962-1083
eISSN
1365-294X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2965697

Zitieren

Eckert S, Herden J, Stift M, Joshi J, van Kleunen M. Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe. Molecular Ecology. 2021;30(1):222-236.
Eckert, S., Herden, J., Stift, M., Joshi, J., & van Kleunen, M. (2021). Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe. Molecular Ecology, 30(1), 222-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15722
Eckert, Silvia, Herden, Jasmin, Stift, Marc, Joshi, Jasmin, and van Kleunen, Mark. 2021. “Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe”. Molecular Ecology 30 (1): 222-236.
Eckert, S., Herden, J., Stift, M., Joshi, J., and van Kleunen, M. (2021). Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe. Molecular Ecology 30, 222-236.
Eckert, S., et al., 2021. Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe. Molecular Ecology, 30(1), p 222-236.
S. Eckert, et al., “Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe”, Molecular Ecology, vol. 30, 2021, pp. 222-236.
Eckert, S., Herden, J., Stift, M., Joshi, J., van Kleunen, M.: Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe. Molecular Ecology. 30, 222-236 (2021).
Eckert, Silvia, Herden, Jasmin, Stift, Marc, Joshi, Jasmin, and van Kleunen, Mark. “Manipulation of cytosine methylation does not remove latitudinal clines in two invasive goldenrod species in Central Europe”. Molecular Ecology 30.1 (2021): 222-236.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 33150604
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar