Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial
Rappelt L, Held S, Leicht M, Wicker P, Donath L (2022)
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 4: 968258.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
fspor-04-968258.pdf
723.76 KB
Autor*in
Rappelt, Ludwig;
Held, Steffen;
Leicht, Mario;
Wicker, PamelaUniBi;
Donath, Lars
Einrichtung
Abstract / Bemerkung
Cluster Training (CT) has been shown to induce strength at lower perceived efforts compared to traditional training (TRT) with sets performed to repetition failure. These findings have not yet been extended to remote online training in middle-aged to older people. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic with notable contact reductions, the present study aimed at investigating whether a cluster set online training with bodyweight exercises is similar effective than a more demanding traditional strength training employed with a traditional set structure. A total of n=21 participants (14 female, 55 ± 12 years, 76.4 ± 16.1 kg, 1.71 ± 0.10 m, 74 ± 72 min of activity/w) were randomly assigned to either a CT or volume-, load-, and work-to-rest-ratio-matched TRT. After an initial six-week run-in-phase, all participants were engaged into an online live-instructed full-body workout twice a week (40 min each) for a period of 6 weeks. Rates of perceived efforts (RPE) were assessed for each session (session RPE; sRPE). Changes in maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) at leg press (LP) and abdominal press (AP) as well as one-minute-sit-to-stand and Y-Balance-Test (YBT) were compared between BASELINE and PRE (ΔRUN-IN) and between PRE and POST (ΔINTERVENTION). In LP, TRT showed greater improvements with large effect sizes in ΔINTERVENTION compared to ΔRUN-IN. In CT, greater improvements with moderate effects were found in ΔINTERVENTION compared to ΔRUN-IN. In AP, both CT and TRT showed larger improvements with large effect sizes in ΔINTERVENTION compared to ΔRUN-IN. In YBT, a significant and large main effect for time was found indicating larger improvements for ΔINTERVENTION compared to ΔRUN-IN. CT showed lower sRPE than TRT. Both CT and TRT led to similar adaptations in MVC and balance performance. However, the perceived effort of CT was rated lower than for TRT. Therefore, conducting resistance training with a cluster set structure seems to be a suitable approach for training programs in middle-aged and older people.
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Band
4
Art.-Nr.
968258
Urheberrecht / Lizenzen
eISSN
2624-9367
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2965272
Zitieren
Rappelt L, Held S, Leicht M, Wicker P, Donath L. Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2022;4: 968258.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Leicht, M., Wicker, P., & Donath, L. (2022). Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 968258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.968258
Rappelt, Ludwig, Held, Steffen, Leicht, Mario, Wicker, Pamela, and Donath, Lars. 2022. “Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial”. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 4: 968258.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Leicht, M., Wicker, P., and Donath, L. (2022). Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 4:968258.
Rappelt, L., et al., 2022. Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4: 968258.
L. Rappelt, et al., “Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial”, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, vol. 4, 2022, : 968258.
Rappelt, L., Held, S., Leicht, M., Wicker, P., Donath, L.: Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 4, : 968258 (2022).
Rappelt, Ludwig, Held, Steffen, Leicht, Mario, Wicker, Pamela, and Donath, Lars. “Similar strength gains at lower perceived efforts via cluster set versus traditional home-based online training: A six weeks randomized controlled trial”. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 4 (2022): 968258.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Name
fspor-04-968258.pdf
723.76 KB
Access Level
Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2022-10-24T15:14:42Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
c1f0be7a45ebc87181285e2f83e5ae67
Link(s) zu Volltext(en)
Access Level
Open Access
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 36091869
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in