What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others

Adriaans J, Liebig S, Sabbagh C, Jasso G (2021)
Social Justice Research 34(4): 397-427.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Adriaans, JuleUniBi ; Liebig, Stefan; Sabbagh, Clara; Jasso, Guillermina
Abstract / Bemerkung
**Abstract**
Despite Rawls’ famous call to distinguish between justice and fairness, these and other justice-related words often seem to be used interchangeably by both ordinary people and justice researchers. Based on a survey-embedded question wording experiment (N = 4534) fielded in Germany as part of the GESIS Panel, we explore the effects of three justice words— “just,” “fair,” and “appropriate”—on the sense of justice about earnings for self and others. We observe differences in the just reward, justice evaluation, and justice consequences by justice word. For example, justice evaluations of one’s own earnings are more negative, i.e., deeper in the underreward territory, signaling larger just rewards, when using “just” instead of “fair” or “appropriate” in the question wording. No such clear pattern emerges for justice evaluations of others’ earnings. Our analyses show the decreasing effect of an underreward situation on psychosocial health to be significantly stronger in the “just” condition compared to the “fair” condition but do not reveal differential consequences by justice word for measures of satisfaction and trust. Overall, the observed differences by justice words are moderate in size. Nonetheless, our findings suggest caution for justice researchers in communicating with peers and respondents and warrant further inquiry extending research on the role of “justice language” to other language–country contexts.
Stichworte
Justice words; Justice of earnings; Question wording; Survey- embedded experiment; German–Germany
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Zeitschriftentitel
Social Justice Research
Band
34
Ausgabe
4
Seite(n)
397-427
ISSN
0885-7466
eISSN
1573-6725
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2962969

Zitieren

Adriaans J, Liebig S, Sabbagh C, Jasso G. What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others. Social Justice Research. 2021;34(4):397-427.
Adriaans, J., Liebig, S., Sabbagh, C., & Jasso, G. (2021). What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others. Social Justice Research, 34(4), 397-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-021-00380-1
Adriaans, J., Liebig, S., Sabbagh, C., and Jasso, G. (2021). What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others. Social Justice Research 34, 397-427.
Adriaans, J., et al., 2021. What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others. Social Justice Research, 34(4), p 397-427.
J. Adriaans, et al., “What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others”, Social Justice Research, vol. 34, 2021, pp. 397-427.
Adriaans, J., Liebig, S., Sabbagh, C., Jasso, G.: What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others. Social Justice Research. 34, 397-427 (2021).
Adriaans, Jule, Liebig, Stefan, Sabbagh, Clara, and Jasso, Guillermina. “What’s in a Word? Just vs. Fair vs. Appropriate Earnings for Self and Others”. Social Justice Research 34.4 (2021): 397-427.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Link(s) zu Volltext(en)
Access Level
OA Open Access

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Suchen in

Google Scholar