Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)

Ohmann HA, Kuper N, Wacker J (2022)
PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262902.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Ohmann, Hanno Andreas; Kuper, NiclasUniBi; Wacker, Jan
Abstract / Bemerkung
The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) has gained validity evidence from several studies. However, various modifications have been applied to the original version, which have never been compared systematically. In Study 1, we tested 120 healthy participants to directly compare two versions of the EEfRT. In Study 2, we tested a larger sample of 394 healthy participants to further examine the original EEfRT. We replicated the split-half reliability of both task versions. However, self-reported personality traits (e.g., trait BAS) correlated with only some task performance parameters in Study 1, which did not replicate for the original EEfRT in Study 2. Our results indicate complex and sometimes inconsistent relations between different personality traits, task properties, and reward attributes.
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Zeitschriftentitel
PLoS ONE
Band
17
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
e0262902
eISSN
1932-6203
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2960856

Zitieren

Ohmann HA, Kuper N, Wacker J. Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1): e0262902.
Ohmann, H. A., Kuper, N., & Wacker, J. (2022). Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLoS ONE, 17(1), e0262902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262902
Ohmann, Hanno Andreas, Kuper, Niclas, and Wacker, Jan. 2022. “Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)”. PLoS ONE 17 (1): e0262902.
Ohmann, H. A., Kuper, N., and Wacker, J. (2022). Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLoS ONE 17:e0262902.
Ohmann, H.A., Kuper, N., & Wacker, J., 2022. Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLoS ONE, 17(1): e0262902.
H.A. Ohmann, N. Kuper, and J. Wacker, “Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)”, PLoS ONE, vol. 17, 2022, : e0262902.
Ohmann, H.A., Kuper, N., Wacker, J.: Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT). PLoS ONE. 17, : e0262902 (2022).
Ohmann, Hanno Andreas, Kuper, Niclas, and Wacker, Jan. “Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)”. PLoS ONE 17.1 (2022): e0262902.

Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 35089948
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar