Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking
Schlenter J, Esaulova Y, Dolscheid S, Penke M (2022)
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience: 1-22.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| E-Veröff. vor dem Druck | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Schlenter, Judith;
Esaulova, Yulia;
Dolscheid, SarahUniBi;
Penke, Martina
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Zeitschriftentitel
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Seite(n)
1-22
ISSN
2327-3798
eISSN
2327-3801
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2960739
Zitieren
Schlenter J, Esaulova Y, Dolscheid S, Penke M. Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2022:1-22.
Schlenter, J., Esaulova, Y., Dolscheid, S., & Penke, M. (2022). Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2026419
Schlenter, Judith, Esaulova, Yulia, Dolscheid, Sarah, and Penke, Martina. 2022. “Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking”. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-22.
Schlenter, J., Esaulova, Y., Dolscheid, S., and Penke, M. (2022). Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-22.
Schlenter, J., et al., 2022. Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, , p 1-22.
J. Schlenter, et al., “Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking”, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2022, pp. 1-22.
Schlenter, J., Esaulova, Y., Dolscheid, S., Penke, M.: Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 1-22 (2022).
Schlenter, Judith, Esaulova, Yulia, Dolscheid, Sarah, and Penke, Martina. “Ambiguity in case marking does not affect the description of transitive events in German: evidence from sentence production and eye-tracking”. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (2022): 1-22.
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Suchen in
Google Scholar