Conventional Evaluativity

Zakkou J (2021)
Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | E-Veröff. vor dem Druck | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
Some expressions, such as 'generous' and 'stingy', are used not only to describe the world around us. They are also used to evaluate the things to which they are applied. In this paper, I suggest a novel account of how this evaluation is conveyed-the conventional triggering view. It partly agrees and partly disagrees with both the standard semantic view and its popular pragmatic contender. Like the former and unlike the latter, my view has it that the evaluation is conveyed due to the conventional meaning of the sentences in question. Unlike the former and much like the latter, my view suggests that the evaluation is a secondary rather than a primary content.
Stichworte
evaluative terms; thick terms; thin terms; cancellability; calculability
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Zeitschriftentitel
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
ISSN
0004-8402
eISSN
1471-6828
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2960400

Zitieren

Zakkou J. Conventional Evaluativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2021.
Zakkou, J. (2021). Conventional Evaluativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.2013264
Zakkou, Julia. 2021. “Conventional Evaluativity”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Zakkou, J. (2021). Conventional Evaluativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Zakkou, J., 2021. Conventional Evaluativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
J. Zakkou, “Conventional Evaluativity”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2021.
Zakkou, J.: Conventional Evaluativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. (2021).
Zakkou, Julia. “Conventional Evaluativity”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2021).
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar