<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
         xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
         xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
         xmlns:fabio="http://purl.org/spar/fabio/"
         xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
         xmlns:event="http://purl.org/NET/c4dm/event.owl#"
         xmlns:ore="http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2950135">
        <ore:isDescribedBy rdf:resource="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2950135"/>
        <dc:title>Utopia Without Us?</dc:title>
        <bibo:authorList rdf:parseType="Collection">
            <foaf:Person rdf:about="https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/person/47424226">
                <foaf:name>Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár</foaf:name>
                <foaf:surname>Simon</foaf:surname>
                <foaf:givenname>Zoltán Boldizsár</foaf:givenname>
            </foaf:Person>
        </bibo:authorList>
        <bibo:abstract>As the prospect of self-authored human extinction increasingly appears as a plausible scenario of
human futures, a growing number of efforts aim at comprehending it as the prospect of the world without
us. Patrícia Vieira convincingly shows in her essay on utopia and dystopia in the Anthropocene that
utopianism has become a prominent interpretive strategy to render the possibility of human extinction
meaningful. This brief reflection argues against the feasibility of considering the world without us in
utopian terms. It identifies three tacit assumptions in utopian interpretations of our disappearance: they
(1) take for granted that prospects of human extinction and post-apocalyptic themes are of the same
kind; (2) presume that the biological character of human extinction needs no special attention when
situating it with the social character of utopian thinking; and (3) remain committed to an anthropocentric
view in assuming that we are the ones to attribute meaning even to the world defined by our absence.
In challenging these assumptions, the essay develops three theses on the relation of utopia and the
prospect of the world without us.</bibo:abstract>
        <bibo:volume>27</bibo:volume>
        <bibo:issue>46</bibo:issue>
        <bibo:startPage>377-389</bibo:startPage>
        <bibo:endPage>377-389</bibo:endPage>
        <dc:publisher>Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina</dc:publisher>
        <fabio:hasPublishingYear>2020</fabio:hasPublishingYear>
        <dc:isPartOf rdf:resource="urn:issn:1414-722x"/>
        <dc:isPartOf rdf:resource="urn:issn:2175-7976"/>
        <bibo:doi rdf:resource="10.5007/2175-7976.2020.e72517" />
        <ore:similarTo rdf:resource="info:doi/10.5007/2175-7976.2020.e72517"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
