Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent
Carrier M (2018)
In: Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. Christian A, Hommen D, Retzlaff N, Schurz G (Eds); European Studies in Philosophy of Science, 9. Cham: Springer: 155-169.
Sammelwerksbeitrag
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Carrier, Identifying Agnotological Ploys, 2018.pdf
104.18 KB
Request a Copy
Autor*in
Herausgeber*in
Christian, Alexander;
Hommen, David;
Retzlaff, Nina;
Schurz, Gerhard
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Buchtitel
Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities
Serientitel
European Studies in Philosophy of Science
Band
9
Seite(n)
155 -169
Urheberrecht / Lizenzen
ISBN
978-3-319-72576-5
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2944696
Zitieren
Carrier M. Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent. In: Christian A, Hommen D, Retzlaff N, Schurz G, eds. Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. European Studies in Philosophy of Science. Vol 9. Cham: Springer; 2018: 155-169.
Carrier, M. (2018). Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent. In A. Christian, D. Hommen, N. Retzlaff, & G. Schurz (Eds.), European Studies in Philosophy of Science: Vol. 9. Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities (pp. 155-169). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72577-2_9
Carrier, Martin. 2018. “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent”. In Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities, ed. Alexander Christian, David Hommen, Nina Retzlaff, and Gerhard Schurz, 9:155-169. European Studies in Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer.
Carrier, M. (2018). “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent” in Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities, Christian, A., Hommen, D., Retzlaff, N., and Schurz, G. eds. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. 9, (Cham: Springer), 155-169.
Carrier, M., 2018. Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent. In A. Christian, et al., eds. Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. European Studies in Philosophy of Science. no.9 Cham: Springer, pp. 155-169.
M. Carrier, “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent”, Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities, A. Christian, et al., eds., European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol. 9, Cham: Springer, 2018, pp.155-169.
Carrier, M.: Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent. In: Christian, A., Hommen, D., Retzlaff, N., and Schurz, G. (eds.) Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. European Studies in Philosophy of Science. 9, p. 155-169. Springer, Cham (2018).
Carrier, Martin. “Identifying Agnotological Ploys: How to Stay Clear of Unjustified Dissent”. Philosophy of Science. Between the Natural Science, the Social Sciences, and the Humanities. Ed. Alexander Christian, David Hommen, Nina Retzlaff, and Gerhard Schurz. Cham: Springer, 2018.Vol. 9. European Studies in Philosophy of Science. 155-169.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Name
Carrier, Identifying Agnotological Ploys, 2018.pdf
104.18 KB
Request a Copy
Access Level
Request a Copy
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2021-06-08T09:50:06Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
66d6f41dc7d579778a8fe833886a4928
Google Scholar
ISBN Suche