Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.

Kennedy-Martin M, Slaap B, Herdman M, van Reenen M, Kennedy-Martin T, Greiner W, Busschbach J, Boye KS (2020)
The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | E-Veröff. vor dem Druck | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Kennedy-Martin, Matthew; Slaap, Bernhard; Herdman, Michael; van Reenen, Mandy; Kennedy-Martin, Tessa; Greiner, WolfgangUniBi; Busschbach, Jan; Boye, Kristina S
Abstract / Bemerkung
BACKGROUND: Several multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) are available from which utilities can be derived for use in cost-utility analysis (CUA). This study provides a review of recommendations from national health technology assessment (HTA) agencies regarding the choice of MAUIs.; METHODS: A list was compiled of HTA agencies that provide or refer to published official pharmacoeconomic (PE) guidelines for pricing, reimbursement or market access. The guidelines were reviewed for recommendations on the indirect calculation of utilities and categorized as: a preference for a specific MAUI; providing no MAUI preference, but providing examples of suitable MAUIs and/or recommending the use of national value sets; and recommending CUA, but not providing examples of MAUIs.; RESULTS: Thirty-four PE guidelines were included for review. MAUIs named for use in CUA: EQ-5D (n=29 guidelines), the SF-6D (n=11), HUI (n=10), QWB (n=3), AQoL (n=2), CHU9D (n=1). EQ-5D was a preferred MAUI in 15 guidelines. Alongside the EQ-5D, the HUI was a preferred MAUI in one guideline, with DALY disability weights mentioned in another. Fourteen guidelines expressed no preference for a specific MAUI, but provided examples: EQ-5D (n=14), SF-6D (n=11), HUI (n=9), QWB (n=3), AQoL (n=2), CHU9D (n=1). Of those that did not specify a particular MAUI, 12 preferred calculating utilities using national preference weights.; CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-6D were the three MAUIs most frequently mentioned in guidelines. The most commonly cited MAUI (in 85% of PE guidelines) was EQ-5D, either as a preferred MAUI or as an example of a suitable MAUI for use in CUA in HTA.
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Zeitschriftentitel
The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
eISSN
1618-7601, 1439-6637
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2943887

Zitieren

Kennedy-Martin M, Slaap B, Herdman M, et al. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. 2020.
Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., et al. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8
Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., and Boye, K. S. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care.
Kennedy-Martin, M., et al., 2020. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care.
M. Kennedy-Martin, et al., “Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.”, The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2020.
Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., Boye, K.S.: Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. (2020).
Kennedy-Martin, Matthew, Slaap, Bernhard, Herdman, Michael, van Reenen, Mandy, Kennedy-Martin, Tessa, Greiner, Wolfgang, Busschbach, Jan, and Boye, Kristina S. “Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.”. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care (2020).

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 32514643
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar