When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one

Dolscheid S, Schleussinger F, Penke M (2019)
Journal of Numerical Cognition 5(3): 301-313.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 872.79 KB
Autor*in
Dolscheid, SarahUniBi; Schleussinger, Franziska; Penke, Martina
Abstract / Bemerkung

In English, a lexical distinction is drawn between the indefinite determiner “a” and the numeral “one”. English-speaking children also interpret the two terms differently, with an exact, upper bounded interpretation of the numeral “one”, but no upper bounded interpretation of the indefinite determiner “a”. Unlike English, however, German does not draw a distinction between the indefinite determiner and the numeral one but instead uses the same term “ein/e” to express both functions. To find out whether this cross-linguistic difference affects children’s upper bounded interpretation of “ein/e”, we tested German-speaking children and adults in a truth-value-judgment task and compared their performance to English-speaking children. Our results revealed that German-speaking children differed from both English children and German adults. Whereas the majority of German adults interpreted “ein/e” in an upper bounded way (i.e. as exactly one, not two), the majority of German-speaking children favored a non-upper bounded interpretation (thus accepting two as a valid response to “ein/e”). German-speaking children’s proportion of upper bounded responses to “ein/e” was also significantly lower than English children’s upper bounded responses to “one”. However, German children’s rate of upper bounded responses increased once a number-biasing context was provided. These findings suggest that German-speaking children can interpret “ein/e” in an upper bounded way but that they need additional cues in order to do so. When no such cues are present, German-speaking children differ from both German-speaking adults and from their English-speaking peers, demonstrating that cross-linguistic differences can affect the way speakers interpret numbers.

Erscheinungsjahr
2019
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Band
5
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
301-313
eISSN
2363-8761
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2943337

Zitieren

Dolscheid S, Schleussinger F, Penke M. When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 2019;5(3):301-313.
Dolscheid, S., Schleussinger, F., & Penke, M. (2019). When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(3), 301-313. doi:10.5964/jnc.v5i3.199
Dolscheid, S., Schleussinger, F., and Penke, M. (2019). When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one. Journal of Numerical Cognition 5, 301-313.
Dolscheid, S., Schleussinger, F., & Penke, M., 2019. When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 5(3), p 301-313.
S. Dolscheid, F. Schleussinger, and M. Penke, “When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one”, Journal of Numerical Cognition, vol. 5, 2019, pp. 301-313.
Dolscheid, S., Schleussinger, F., Penke, M.: When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 5, 301-313 (2019).
Dolscheid, Sarah, Schleussinger, Franziska, and Penke, Martina. “When “one” can be “two”: Cross-linguistic differences affect children’s interpretation of the numeral one”. Journal of Numerical Cognition 5.3 (2019): 301-313.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Name
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2020-05-11T09:46:06Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
94e4308abd346f81a9cd897da4e66199

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Suchen in

Google Scholar