PUB - Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld

The paper picks up on a number of critical remarks by Eisewicht and Grenz (2018). Visa vis the caveat of not sufficiently responding to existing literature on evaluative criteria, we emphasize that our argument follows a different approach, relying more on experiences in practical evaluation processes. Against the concern that our evaluative criteria might result in excluding certain research approaches, we stress the necessity of overarching criteria. Only this way, we can reasonably respond to the regularly requested evaluation (better/ worse) of qualitative publications or research proposals.