Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity
Reder M, Berens E-M, Spallek J, Kolip P (2019)
BMC Psychology 7(1): 17.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
s40359-019-0291-2.reder.pdf
924.65 KB
Abstract / Bemerkung
Background
Informed choice is of ethical and practical importance in mammography screening. To assess the level to which decisions regarding such screening are informed is thus imperative, but no specific instrument has been available to measure informed choice in the German mammography screening programme. The aims of this study were to develop the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ) and to find first evidence for the factor structure, reliability and validity of its different components.
Methods
The IMQ was sent to 17.349 women aged 50 in Westphalia-Lippe, Germany. The instrument has been developed after consideration of (1) the results of qualitative interviews on decision making in the mammography screening programme, (2) relevant literature on other informed choice instruments and (3) a qualitative study on influencing factors. The IMQ comprises 3 scales (attitude, norms, and barriers), 1 index (knowledge) and singular items covering intention to participate and sociodemographic variables. To assess the psychometric properties of the components of the IMQ, confirmatory factor and item response theory analyses were conducted. Additionally, reliability, validity and item statistics were assessed.
Results
5.847 questionnaires were returned (response rate 33.7%). For attitude, the confirmatory factor analysis supported a one-factor structure. For norms, the model fit was not acceptable. Reliability levels were good with a Cronbach‘s α of.793 for attitude (4 items) and.795 for norms (5 items). For barriers, 9 items were deleted because of low discrimination indices; 6 items remained. The hypothesised assumption-subscale and the importance-subscale were confirmed, but these subscales showed poor reliabilities with Cronbach‘s α=.525 (4 items) and.583 (2 items). For the knowledge index, item response theory analysis showed that 6 out of 7 items were suitable. Hypotheses concerning the correlations between the different components were confirmed, which supported their convergent and divergent validity.
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrated that the IMQ is a multidimensional instrument. Further development of the barriers and norms scales is necessary. The IMQ can be utilised to assess the level of informed choices as well as influencing factors.
Stichworte
Mammography screening;
Informed choice;
Confirmatory factor analysis;
Reliability;
Validity
Erscheinungsjahr
2019
Zeitschriftentitel
BMC Psychology
Band
7
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
17
ISSN
2050-7283
eISSN
2050-7283
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2934482
Zitieren
Reder M, Berens E-M, Spallek J, Kolip P. Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. BMC Psychology. 2019;7(1): 17.
Reder, M., Berens, E. - M., Spallek, J., & Kolip, P. (2019). Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. BMC Psychology, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0291-2
Reder, Maren, Berens, Eva-Maria, Spallek, Jacob, and Kolip, Petra. 2019. “Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity”. BMC Psychology 7 (1): 17.
Reder, M., Berens, E. - M., Spallek, J., and Kolip, P. (2019). Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. BMC Psychology 7:17.
Reder, M., et al., 2019. Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. BMC Psychology, 7(1): 17.
M. Reder, et al., “Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity”, BMC Psychology, vol. 7, 2019, : 17.
Reder, M., Berens, E.-M., Spallek, J., Kolip, P.: Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. BMC Psychology. 7, : 17 (2019).
Reder, Maren, Berens, Eva-Maria, Spallek, Jacob, and Kolip, Petra. “Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity”. BMC Psychology 7.1 (2019): 17.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Name
s40359-019-0291-2.reder.pdf
924.65 KB
Access Level
Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:19:06Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
364bcb0749cb45934134c770d0cfe239
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
27 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
German cancer statistics 2004.
Haberland J, Bertz J, Wolf U, Ziese T, Kurth BM., BMC Cancer 10(), 2010
PMID: 20175882
Haberland J, Bertz J, Wolf U, Ziese T, Kurth BM., BMC Cancer 10(), 2010
PMID: 20175882
Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review.
Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, Lilleyman J, MacIntosh M, Maule AJ, Michie S, Pearman AD., Health Technol Assess 3(1), 1999
PMID: 10350446
Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB, Lilleyman J, MacIntosh M, Maule AJ, Michie S, Pearman AD., Health Technol Assess 3(1), 1999
PMID: 10350446
A measure of informed choice.
Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S., Health Expect 4(2), 2001
PMID: 11359540
Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S., Health Expect 4(2), 2001
PMID: 11359540
The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study.
Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 48(1), 2002
PMID: 12220754
Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 48(1), 2002
PMID: 12220754
Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women.
Mathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM, McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N., Arch. Intern. Med. 167(19), 2007
PMID: 17954796
Mathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM, McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N., Arch. Intern. Med. 167(19), 2007
PMID: 17954796
Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women.
Mathieu E, Barratt AL, McGeechan K, Davey HM, Howard K, Houssami N., Patient Educ Couns 81(1), 2010
PMID: 20149953
Mathieu E, Barratt AL, McGeechan K, Davey HM, Howard K, Houssami N., Patient Educ Couns 81(1), 2010
PMID: 20149953
Do women make an informed choice about participating in breast cancer screening? A survey among women invited for a first mammography screening examination.
van Agt H, Fracheboud J, van der Steen A, de Koning H., Patient Educ Couns 89(2), 2012
PMID: 22963769
van Agt H, Fracheboud J, van der Steen A, de Koning H., Patient Educ Couns 89(2), 2012
PMID: 22963769
Development of a measure of informed choice suitable for use in low literacy populations.
Dormandy E, Tsui EY, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 66(3), 2007
PMID: 17300913
Dormandy E, Tsui EY, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 66(3), 2007
PMID: 17300913
A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol.
Berens EM, Reder M, Kolip P, Spallek J., BMJ Open 4(9), 2014
PMID: 25231495
Berens EM, Reder M, Kolip P, Spallek J., BMJ Open 4(9), 2014
PMID: 25231495
Determinants of mammography screening participation among Turkish immigrant women in Germany--a qualitative study reflecting key informants' and women's perspectives.
Berens EM, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Spallek J, Razum O., Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(1), 2015
PMID: 26052964
Berens EM, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Spallek J, Razum O., Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 25(1), 2015
PMID: 26052964
Informed Choice in the German Mammography Screening Program by Education and Migrant Status: Survey among First-Time Invitees.
Berens EM, Reder M, Razum O, Kolip P, Spallek J., PLoS ONE 10(11), 2015
PMID: 26529513
Berens EM, Reder M, Razum O, Kolip P, Spallek J., PLoS ONE 10(11), 2015
PMID: 26529513
Measuring breast cancer and mammography screening beliefs among Chinese American immigrants.
Lee-Lin F, Menon U, Pett M, Nail L, Lee S, Mooney K., West J Nurs Res 30(7), 2008
PMID: 18515751
Lee-Lin F, Menon U, Pett M, Nail L, Lee S, Mooney K., West J Nurs Res 30(7), 2008
PMID: 18515751
Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening.
Champion VL., Res Nurs Health 22(4), 1999
PMID: 10435551
Champion VL., Res Nurs Health 22(4), 1999
PMID: 10435551
Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk.
Tyndel S, Clements A, Bankhead C, Henderson BJ, Brain K, Watson E, Austoker J; PIMMS Study Management Group, Duffy S, Evans G, Fielder H, Gray J, Mackay J, Macmillan D., Br. J. Cancer 99(7), 2008
PMID: 18827822
Tyndel S, Clements A, Bankhead C, Henderson BJ, Brain K, Watson E, Austoker J; PIMMS Study Management Group, Duffy S, Evans G, Fielder H, Gray J, Mackay J, Macmillan D., Br. J. Cancer 99(7), 2008
PMID: 18827822
Relationships between decisional balance and stage of adopting mammography and Pap testing among Chinese American women.
Strong C, Liang W., Cancer Epidemiol 33(5), 2009
PMID: 19900848
Strong C, Liang W., Cancer Epidemiol 33(5), 2009
PMID: 19900848
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.
Gotzsche PC, Jorgensen KJ., Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6), 2013
PMID: 23737396
Gotzsche PC, Jorgensen KJ., Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6), 2013
PMID: 23737396
Item response theory for measurement validity.
Yang FM, Kao ST., Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 26(3), 2014
PMID: 25114494
Yang FM, Kao ST., Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 26(3), 2014
PMID: 25114494
Meta-Analysis of the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA) to Understanding Health Behaviors.
McEachan R, Taylor N, Harrison R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Conner M., Ann Behav Med 50(4), 2016
PMID: 27169555
McEachan R, Taylor N, Harrison R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Conner M., Ann Behav Med 50(4), 2016
PMID: 27169555
Informed choice: understanding knowledge in the context of screening uptake.
Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 50(3), 2003
PMID: 12900094
Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM., Patient Educ Couns 50(3), 2003
PMID: 12900094
Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox.
Braeken J, Tuerlinckx F., Behav Res Methods 41(4), 2009
PMID: 19897820
Braeken J, Tuerlinckx F., Behav Res Methods 41(4), 2009
PMID: 19897820
Validation of the Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs Questionnaire among African Australian women.
Kwok C, Ogunsiji O, Lee CF., BMC Public Health 16(), 2016
PMID: 26846341
Kwok C, Ogunsiji O, Lee CF., BMC Public Health 16(), 2016
PMID: 26846341
Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors.
Klug SJ, Hetzer M, Blettner M., Eur J Public Health 15(1), 2005
PMID: 15788807
Klug SJ, Hetzer M, Blettner M., Eur J Public Health 15(1), 2005
PMID: 15788807
Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.
Bond M, Pavey T, Welch K, Cooper C, Garside R, Dean S, Hyde C., Health Technol Assess 17(13), 2013
PMID: 23540978
Bond M, Pavey T, Welch K, Cooper C, Garside R, Dean S, Hyde C., Health Technol Assess 17(13), 2013
PMID: 23540978
Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.
Hersch J, Jansen J, Barratt A, Irwig L, Houssami N, Howard K, Dhillon H, McCaffery K., BMJ 346(), 2013
PMID: 23344309
Hersch J, Jansen J, Barratt A, Irwig L, Houssami N, Howard K, Dhillon H, McCaffery K., BMJ 346(), 2013
PMID: 23344309
Breast screening: the facts--or maybe not.
Gotzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jorgensen KJ., BMJ 338(), 2009
PMID: 19174442
Gotzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jorgensen KJ., BMJ 338(), 2009
PMID: 19174442
Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms.
Jorgensen KJ, Brodersen J, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Gotzsche PC., J Med Ethics 35(4), 2009
PMID: 19332586
Jorgensen KJ, Brodersen J, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Gotzsche PC., J Med Ethics 35(4), 2009
PMID: 19332586
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 30890190
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in