A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size

Schütz C, Schack T (2019)
Frontiers in Psychology 10: 561.

Download
OA 1.02 MB
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Volltext vorhanden für diesen Nachweis
Abstract / Bemerkung
In sequential tasks, a partial reuse of former motor plans results in a persistence in the former posture (termed hysteresis). The cost-optimization hypothesis states that the percentage of reuse depends on the relative cognitive and mechanical cost of each movement. These costs should be constant across all drawers, yet previous studies found a larger hysteresis effect at the central drawers and declining effects toward the periphery. In the current study, we show that a simple mathematical model that assumes a sigmoid optimal grasp angle function and a fixed percentage of motor plan reuse explains the posture variance in a randomized and an ordered sequential drawer opening task. This finding indicates that (1) the optimal pro/supination angle is a sigmoid function of drawer height, (2) the percentage of motor plan reuse is constant across drawers, and (3) a constant percentage of reuse results in a larger hysteresis effect at the central drawers. Based on the model, the percentage of motor plan reuse in future studies can be estimated from the size of the motor hysteresis effect.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
10
Art.-Nr.
561
eISSN
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Schütz C, Schack T. A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10: 561.
Schütz, C., & Schack, T. (2019). A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 561. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00561
Schütz, C., and Schack, T. (2019). A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size. Frontiers in Psychology 10:561.
Schütz, C., & Schack, T., 2019. A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 561.
C. Schütz and T. Schack, “A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019, : 561.
Schütz, C., Schack, T.: A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size. Frontiers in Psychology. 10, : 561 (2019).
Schütz, Christoph, and Schack, Thomas. “A simple model to estimate the percentage of motor plan reuse from hysteresis effect size”. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019): 561.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-03-21T07:14:46Z

23 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Working memory.
Baddeley A., Science 255(5044), 1992
PMID: 1736359
The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory.
Lawrence BM, Myerson J, Oonk HM, Abrams RA., Memory 9(4), 2001
PMID: 11747593
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
Oldfield RC., Neuropsychologia 9(1), 1971
PMID: 5146491
The problem of serial order in behavior: Lashley's legacy.
Rosenbaum DA, Cohen RG, Jax SA, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Hum Mov Sci 26(4), 2007
PMID: 17698232
Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.
Sainburg RL., Exp Brain Res 142(2), 2001
PMID: 11807578
Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.
Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D., J. Neurophysiol. 83(5), 2000
PMID: 10805666
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.
Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 228(4), 2013
PMID: 23727830
Motor control strategies in a continuous task space.
Schutz C, Weigelt M, Odekerken D, Klein-Soetebier T, Schack T., Motor Control 15(3), 2011
PMID: 21878687
Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.
Schutz C, Weigelt M, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 235(3), 2016
PMID: 27864596
Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.
Short MW, Cauraugh JH., Acta Psychol (Amst) 100(3), 1999
PMID: 9894689
Analysis of residuals: criteria for determining goodness-of-fit.
Straume M, Johnson ML., Meth. Enzymol. 210(), 1992
PMID: 1584056
Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control.
van der Wel RP, Fleckenstein RM, Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(5), 2007
PMID: 17924811
Moving and memorizing: motor planning modulates the recency effect in serial and free recall.
Weigelt M, Rosenbaum DA, Huelshorst S, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 132(1), 2009
PMID: 19591968
Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects.
Boone DC, Azen SP., J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(5), 1979
PMID: 457719
What happens when data are fitted to the wrong equation?
Ellis KJ, Duggleby RG., Biochem. J. 171(3), 1978
PMID: 666725
A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements.
Haken H, Kelso JA, Bunz H., Biol Cybern 51(5), 1985
PMID: 3978150
Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
Janssen L, Beuting M, Meulenbroek R, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 192(1), 2008
PMID: 18751972
Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning.
Janssen L, Meulenbroek RG, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 209(1), 2010
PMID: 21184219

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 30923509
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar