Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback

Schindler S, Vormbrock R, Kißler J (2019)
Frontiers in Psychology 10: 94.

Download
OA 7.25 MB
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Volltext vorhanden für diesen Nachweis
Abstract / Bemerkung
Recent findings suggest that communicative context affects the timing and magnitude of emotion effects in word processing. In particular, social attributions seem to be one important source of plasticity for the processing of affectively charged language. Here, we investigate the timing and magnitude of ERP responses toward positive, neutral, and negative trait adjectives during the anticipation of putative socio-evaluative feedback from different senders (human and computer) varying in predictability. In the first experiment, during word presentation participants could not anticipate whether a human or a randomly acting computer sender was about to give feedback. Here, a main effect of emotion was observed only on the late positive potential (LPP), showing larger amplitudes for positive compared to neutral adjectives. In the second study the same stimuli and set-up were used, but a block-wise presentation was realized, resulting in fixed and fully predictable sender identity. Feedback was supposedly given by an expert (psychotherapist), a layperson (unknown human), and again by a randomly acting computer. Main effects of emotion started with an increased P1 for negative adjectives, followed by effects at the N1 and early posterior negativity (EPN), showing both largest amplitudes for positive words, as well as for the LPP, where positive and negative words elicited larger amplitudes than neutral words. An interaction revealed that emotional LPP modulations occurred only for a human sender. Finally, regardless of content, anticipating human feedback led to larger P1 and P3 components, being highest for the putative expert. These findings demonstrate the malleability of emotional language processing by social contexts. When clear predictions can be made, our brains rapidly differentiate between emotional and neutral information, as well as between different senders. Attributed human presence affects emotional language processing already during feedback anticipation, in line with a selective gating of attentional resources via anticipatory social significance attributions. By contrast, emotion effects occur much later, when crucial social context information is still missing. These findings demonstrate the context-dependence of emotion effects in word processing and are particularly relevant since virtual communication with unknown senders, whose identity is inferred rather than perceived, has become reality for millions of people.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
10
Art.-Nr.
94
eISSN
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Schindler S, Vormbrock R, Kißler J. Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10: 94.
Schindler, S., Vormbrock, R., & Kißler, J. (2019). Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 94. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00094
Schindler, S., Vormbrock, R., and Kißler, J. (2019). Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology 10:94.
Schindler, S., Vormbrock, R., & Kißler, J., 2019. Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 94.
S. Schindler, R. Vormbrock, and J. Kißler, “Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019, : 94.
Schindler, S., Vormbrock, R., Kißler, J.: Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback. Frontiers in Psychology. 10, : 94 (2019).
Schindler, Sebastian, Vormbrock, Ria, and Kißler, Johanna. “Emotion incContext. How sender predictability and identity affect processing of words as imminent personality feedback”. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019): 94.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-02-07T13:12:10Z

74 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Language as context for the perception of emotion.
Barrett LF, Lindquist KA, Gendron M., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11(8), 2007
PMID: 17625952
P1 and beyond: functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition.
Bayer M, Sommer W, Schacht A., Psychophysiology 49(7), 2012
PMID: 22594767
Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential.
Bradley MM, Lang PJ., J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25(1), 1994
PMID: 7962581
Facing two faces: Defense activation varies as a function of personal relevance.
Bublatzky F, Alpers GW., Biol Psychol 125(), 2017
PMID: 28267568
Social and emotional relevance in face processing: happy faces of future interaction partners enhance the late positive potential.
Bublatzky F, Gerdes AB, White AJ, Riemer M, Alpers GW., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 25076881
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.
Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafo MR., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14(5), 2013
PMID: 23571845

Cohen J.., 1988
It's All About You: an ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse.
Fields EC, Kuperberg GR., Neuroimage 62(1), 2012
PMID: 22584232
First valence, then arousal: the temporal dynamics of brain electric activity evoked by emotional stimuli.
Gianotti LR, Faber PL, Schuler M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Kochi K, Lehmann D., Brain Topogr 20(3), 2008
PMID: 18175212
Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: time-course of the late positive potential.
Hajcak G, Dunning JP, Foti D., Clin Neurophysiol 120(3), 2009
PMID: 19157974
Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions.
Hepper EG, Hart CM, Gregg AP, Sedikides C., J Soc Psychol 151(4), 2011
PMID: 21755655
Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading.
Herbert C, Junghofer M, Kissler J., Psychophysiology 45(3), 2008
PMID: 18221445
Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates.
Hinojosa JA, Mendez-Bertolo C, Pozo MA., Psychophysiology 47(4), 2010
PMID: 20158677
Why most published research findings are false.
Ioannidis JP., PLoS Med. 2(8), 2005
PMID: 16060722
Why most published research findings are false.
Ioannidis JP., PLoS Med. 2(8), 2005
PMID: 16060722
How 'love' and 'hate' differ from 'sleep': using combined electro/magnetoencephalographic data to reveal the sources of early cortical responses to emotional words.
Keuper K, Zwanzger P, Nordt M, Eden A, Laeger I, Zwitserlood P, Kissler J, Junghofer M, Dobel C., Hum Brain Mapp 35(3), 2012
PMID: 23281129
Early prefrontal brain responses to the Hedonic quality of emotional words--a simultaneous EEG and MEG study.
Keuper K, Zwitserlood P, Rehbein MA, Eden AS, Laeger I, Junghofer M, Zwanzger P, Dobel C., PLoS ONE 8(8), 2013
PMID: 23940642
Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies.
Kissler J, Assadollahi R, Herbert C., Prog. Brain Res. 156(), 2006
PMID: 17015079
Buzzwords: early cortical responses to emotional words during reading.
Kissler J, Herbert C, Peyk P, Junghofer M., Psychol Sci 18(6), 2007
PMID: 17576257
Emotion and attention in visual word processing: an ERP study.
Kissler J, Herbert C, Winkler I, Junghofer M., Biol Psychol 80(1), 2008
PMID: 18439739
EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis.
Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S., Brain Res Rev 53(1), 2006
PMID: 16887192
Positively biased processing of self-relevant social feedback.
Korn CW, Prehn K, Park SQ, Walter H, Heekeren HR., J. Neurosci. 32(47), 2012
PMID: 23175836
Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action
Lang P., Bradley M., Cuthbert B.., 1997
Event-related potentials
Luck S.., 2012
Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation.
Luo W, Feng W, He W, Wang NY, Luo YJ., Neuroimage 49(2), 2009
PMID: 19770052
Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli.
Michalowski JM, Melzig CA, Weike AI, Stockburger J, Schupp HT, Hamm AO., Emotion 9(3), 2009
PMID: 19485608
Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.
Michalowski JM, Pane-Farre CA, Low A, Hamm AO., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10(9), 2015
PMID: 25608985
Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.
Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD., Psychol Bull 131(4), 2005
PMID: 16060800
The preregistration revolution.
Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(11), 2018
PMID: 29531091
Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words.
Ortigue S, Michel CM, Murray MM, Mohr C, Carbonnel S, Landis T., Neuroimage 21(4), 2004
PMID: 15050552
Are effects of emotion in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Palazova M, Mantwill K, Sommer W, Schacht A., Neuropsychologia 49(9), 2011
PMID: 21684295
ElectroMagnetoEncephalography software: overview and integration with other EEG/MEG toolboxes.
Peyk P, De Cesarei A, Junghofer M., Comput Intell Neurosci 2011(), 2011
PMID: 21577273
Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.
Polich J., Clin Neurophysiol 118(10), 2007
PMID: 17573239
Motivational Salience Modulates Early Visual Cortex Responses across Task Sets.
Rossi V, Vanlessen N, Bayer M, Grass A, Pourtois G, Schacht A., J Cogn Neurosci 29(6), 2017
PMID: 28129056
Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: emotion and gender specificity.
Sass SM, Heller W, Stewart JL, Silton RL, Edgar JC, Fisher JE, Miller GA., Psychophysiology 47(2), 2009
PMID: 19863758
Emotions in word and face processing: early and late cortical responses.
Schacht A, Sommer W., Brain Cogn 69(3), 2008
PMID: 19097677
Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking.
Scherer K.., 2001
Attributed social context and emotional content recruit frontal and limbic brain regions during virtual feedback processing.
Schindler S, Kruse O, Stark R, Kissler J., Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 19(2), 2019
PMID: 30414041
Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus.
Schindler S, Wegrzyn M, Steppacher I, Kissler J., J. Neurosci. 35(15), 2015
PMID: 25878274
It's all in your head - how anticipating evaluation affects the processing of emotional trait adjectives.
Schindler S, Wegrzyn M, Steppacher I, Kissler J., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25426095
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies.
Schupp HT, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghofer M., Prog. Brain Res. 156(), 2006
PMID: 17015073
Selective visual attention to emotion.
Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Codispoti M, Junghofer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO., J. Neurosci. 27(5), 2007
PMID: 17267562
Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Scott GG, O'Donnell PJ, Leuthold H, Sereno SC., Biol Psychol 80(1), 2008
PMID: 18440691
How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality.
Sharot T, Korn CW, Dolan RJ., Nat. Neurosci. 14(11), 2011
PMID: 21983684
Emotional picture processing in children: an ERP study.
Solomon B, DeCicco JM, Dennis TA., Dev Cogn Neurosci 2(1), 2012
PMID: 22163263
Fear of negative evaluation modulates electrocortical and behavioral responses when anticipating social evaluative feedback.
Van der Molen MJ, Poppelaars ES, Van Hartingsveldt CT, Harrewijn A, Gunther Moor B, Westenberg PM., Front Hum Neurosci 7(), 2013
PMID: 24478667
The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.
Vogel EK, Luck SJ., Psychophysiology 37(2), 2000
PMID: 10731769
Seeing yourself in a positive light: brain correlates of the self-positivity bias.
Watson LA, Dritschel B, Obonsawin MC, Jentzsch I., Brain Res. 1152(), 2007
PMID: 17462610
Don't look at me in anger! Enhanced processing of angry faces in anticipation of public speaking.
Wieser MJ, Pauli P, Reicherts P, Muhlberger A., Psychophysiology 47(2), 2009
PMID: 20030758
Three stages of emotional word processing: an ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation.
Zhang D, He W, Wang T, Luo W, Zhu X, Gu R, Li H, Luo YJ., Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(12), 2014
PMID: 24526185

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 30774611
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar