Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

Heitmann S, Grund A, Berthold K, Fries S, Roelle J (2018)
Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2596.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Testing is a well-established desirable difficulty. Yet there are still some open issues regarding the benefits of testing that need to be addressed. First, the possibility to increase its benefits by adapting the sequence of test questions to the learners' level of knowledge has scarcely been explored. In view of theories that emphasize the benefits of adapting learning tasks to learner knowledge, it is reasonable to assume that the common practice of providing all learners with the same test questions is not optimal. Second, it is an open question as to whether the testing effect prevails if stronger control conditions than the typical restudy condition are used. We addressed these issues in an experiment with N = 200 university students who were randomly assigned to (a) adaptive testing, (b) non-adaptive testing, or note-taking (c) without or (d) with focus guidance. In an initial study phase, all participants watched an e-lecture. Afterward, they processed its content according to their assigned conditions. One week later, all learners took a posttest. As main results, we found that adaptive testing yielded higher learning outcomes than non-adaptive testing. These benefits were mediated by the adaptive learners' higher testing performance and lower perceived cognitive demand during testing. Furthermore, we found that both testing groups outperformed the note-taking groups. Jointly, our results show that the benefits of testing can be enhanced by adapting the sequence of test questions to learners' knowledge and that testing can be more effective than note-taking.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
9
Art.-Nr.
2596
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Heitmann S, Grund A, Berthold K, Fries S, Roelle J. Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9: 2596.
Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., & Roelle, J. (2018). Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2596. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02596
Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., and Roelle, J. (2018). Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology 9:2596.
Heitmann, S., et al., 2018. Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: 2596.
S. Heitmann, et al., “Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, 2018, : 2596.
Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., Roelle, J.: Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, : 2596 (2018).
Heitmann, Svenja, Grund, Axel, Berthold, Kirsten, Fries, Stefan, and Roelle, Julian. “Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking”. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018): 2596.

67 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Rethinking the use of tests: a meta-analysis of practice testing.
Adesope O., Trevisan D., Sundararajan N.., 2017
Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests.
Agarwal P., Karpicke J., Kang S., Roediger H., McDermott K.., 2008
Investigating the testing effect: retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies.
Bae C., Therriault D., Redifer J.., 2018
How to foster active processing of explanations in instructional communication.
Berthold K., Renkl A.., 2010
“Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning,” in
Bjork E., Bjork R.., 1992
Learning with retrieval-based concept mapping.
Blunt J., Karpicke J.., 2014
The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.
Brewer GA, Marsh RL, Meeks JT, Clark-Foos A, Hicks JL., Memory 18(4), 2010
PMID: 20408041
The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
Butler AC, Karpicke JD, Roediger HL 3rd., J Exp Psychol Appl 13(4), 2007
PMID: 18194050
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT., Psychol Sci Public Interest 14(1), 2013
PMID: 26173288
A classroom study on the relationship between student achievement and retrieval-enhanced learning.
Carpenter S., Lund T., Coffman C., Armstrong P., Lamm M., Reason R.., 2016
The effects of tests on learning and forgetting.
Carpenter SK, Pashler H, Wixted JT, Vul E., Mem Cognit 36(2), 2008
PMID: 18426072
The expertise reversal effect is a variant of the more general element interactivity effect.
Chen O., Kalyuga S., Sweller J.., 2016

Cohen J.., 1988
Dynamic task selection: effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation.
Corbalan G., Kester L., van J.., 2009
Self-testing promotes superior retention of anatomy and physiology information.
Dobson JL, Linderholm T., Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 20(1), 2014
PMID: 24838598
Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards.
Dunlosky J, Hartwig MK, Rawson KA, Lipko AR., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 64(3), 2010
PMID: 20700858
Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT., Psychol Sci Public Interest 14(1), 2013
PMID: 26173288
Retrieval practice: the lack of transfer to deductive inferences.
Tran R, Rohrer D, Pashler H., Psychon Bull Rev 22(1), 2015
PMID: 24838305
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A., Behav Res Methods 39(2), 2007
PMID: 17695343
Learning from direct instruction: best prepared by several self-regulated or guided invention activities?
Glogger-Frey I., Gaus K., Renkl A.., 2017
Guided retrieval practice of educational materials using automated scoring.
Grimaldi P., Karpicke J.., 2014

Hattie J.., 2009

Hayes A.., 2013
Teaching to the test…or testing to teach: exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding.
Jensen J., McDaniel M., Woodard S., Kummer T.., 2014
Instructional effectiveness of higher-order questions: the devil is in the detail of students’ use of questions.
Jiang L., Elen J.., 2011
A testing effect with multimedia learning.
Johnson C., Mayer R.., 2009
Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction.
Kalyuga S.., 2007
Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications: introduction to the special issue.
Kalyuga S., Renkl A.., 2010
Educational implications of expertise reversal effects in learning and performance of complex cognitive and sensorimotor skills.
Kalyuga S., Rikers R., Paas F.., 2012
Rethinking the boundaries of cognitive load theory in complex learning.
Kalyuga S., Singh A.-M.., 2016
Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning.
Kalyuga S., Sweller J.., 2005
Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention.
Kang S., McDermott K., Roediger H.., 2007
Retrieval-based learning: a perspective for enhancing meaningful learning.
Karpicke J., Grimaldi P.., 2012
“Retrieval-based learning,” in
Karpicke J., Lehman M., Aue W.., 2014
Tests enhanced learning– Compared to what?
Kornell N., Rabelo V., Klein P.., 2012
Further evidence that concept mapping is not better than repeated retrieval as a tool for learning from texts.
Lechuga M., Ortega-Tudela J., Gómez-Ariza C.., 2015
Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall.
Lipko AR, Dunlosky J, Hartwig MK, Rawson KA, Swan K, Cook D., J Exp Psychol Appl 15(4), 2009
PMID: 20025417
Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.
Lipowski SL, Pyc MA, Dunlosky J, Rawson KA., Dev Psychol 50(4), 2013
PMID: 24294884
Clickers in college classrooms: fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes.
Mayer R., Stull A., DeLeeuw K., Almeroth K., Bimber B., Chun D.., 2009
Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing.
McCrudden M., Schraw G.., 2007
Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: the effects of quiz frequency and placement.
McDaniel M., Agarwal P., Huelser B., McDermott K., Roediger H.., 2011
The read-recite-review study strategy: effective and portable.
McDaniel MA, Howard DC, Einstein GO., Psychol Sci 20(4), 2009
PMID: 19320858
Both multiple-choice and short-answer quizzes enhance later exam performance in middle and high school classes.
McDermott KB, Agarwal PK, D'Antonio L, Roediger HL 3rd, McDaniel MA., J Exp Psychol Appl 20(1), 2013
PMID: 24274234
Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning?
Metcalfe J., J Exp Psychol Gen 131(3), 2002
PMID: 12214751
Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study.
Metcalfe J., Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(3), 2009
PMID: 19750138
“Desirable difficulties and studying in the region of proximal learning,” in
Metcalfe J.., 2011
Five Popular Study Strategies: Their Pitfalls and Optimal Implementations.
Miyatsu T, Nguyen K, McDaniel MA., Perspect Psychol Sci 13(3), 2018
PMID: 29716455
Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis.
Pan SC, Rickard TC., Psychol Bull 144(7), 2018
PMID: 29733621
When is practice testing most effective for improving the durability and efficiency of student learning?
Rawson K., Dunlosky J.., 2012
Different roads lead to Rome: the case of principle-based cognitive skills.
Renkl A.., 2015
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention.
Roediger HL 3rd, Butler AC., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 15(1), 2010
PMID: 20951630
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
Roediger HL, Karpicke JD., Psychol Sci 17(3), 2006
PMID: 16507066
Effects of incorporating retrieval into learning tasks: the complexity of the tasks matters.
Roelle J., Berthold K.., 2017
Two instructional aids to optimise processing and learning from instructional explanations.
Roelle J., Berthold K., Renkl A.., 2014
The role of specificity, targeted learning activities, and prior knowledge for the effects of relevance instructions.
Roelle J., Lehmkuhl N., Beyer M.-U., Berthold K.., 2015
Test-based learning: inconsistent effects between higher- and lower-level test questions.
Roelle J., Roelle D., Berthold K.., 2018
Is testing a more effective learning strategy than note-taking?
Rummer R, Schweppe J, Gerst K, Wagner S., J Exp Psychol Appl 23(3), 2017
PMID: 28933873
Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training.
Salden R., Paas F., Broers N., van J.., 2004
Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect.
Schnotz W.., 2010
Not new, but nearly forgotten: the testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases.
van T., Sweller J.., 2015
Statistical methods in psychology journals.
Wilkinson L.., 1999
How accurately can students evaluate the quality of self-generated examples of declarative concepts? Not well, and feedback does not help.
Zamary A., Rawson K., Dunlosky J.., 2016

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 30619005
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar