A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal

Wells DA, Cant MA, Nichols HJ, Hoffman J (2018)
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY 27(9): 2271-2288.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Wells, David A.; Cant, Michael A.; Nichols, Hazel J.; Hoffman, JosephUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
Inbreeding depression, the reduced fitness of offspring of closely related parents, is commonplace in both captive and wild populations and has important consequences for conservation and mating system evolution. However, because of the difficulty of collecting pedigree and life-history data from wild populations, relatively few studies have been able to compare inbreeding depression for traits at different points in the life cycle. Moreover, pedigrees give the expected proportion of the genome that is identical by descent (IBDg) whereas in theory with enough molecular markers realized IBDg can be quantified directly. We therefore investigated inbreeding depression for multiple life-history traits in a wild population of banded mongooses using pedigree-based inbreeding coefficients (f(ped)) and standardized multilocus heterozygosity (sMLH) measured at 35-43 microsatellites. Within an information theoretic framework, we evaluated support for either f(ped) or sMLH as inbreeding terms and used sequential regression to determine whether the residuals of sMLH on f(ped) explain fitness variation above and beyond f(ped). We found no evidence of inbreeding depression for survival, either before or after nutritional independence. By contrast, inbreeding was negatively associated with two quality-related traits, yearling body mass and annual male reproductive success. Yearling body mass was associated with f(ped) but not sMLH, while male annual reproductive success was best explained by both f(ped) and residual sMLH. Thus, our study not only uncovers variation in the extent to which different traits show inbreeding depression, but also reveals trait-specific differences in the ability of pedigrees and molecular markers to explain fitness variation and suggests that for certain traits, genetic markers may capture variation in realized IBDg above and beyond the pedigree expectation.
Stichworte
banded mongoose; cooperative breeding; heterozygosity; inbreeding; depression; microsatellites; reproductive success; survival
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Zeitschriftentitel
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Band
27
Ausgabe
9
Seite(n)
2271-2288
ISSN
0962-1083
eISSN
1365-294X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2920320

Zitieren

Wells DA, Cant MA, Nichols HJ, Hoffman J. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY. 2018;27(9):2271-2288.
Wells, D. A., Cant, M. A., Nichols, H. J., & Hoffman, J. (2018). A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 27(9), 2271-2288. doi:10.1111/mec.14570
Wells, D. A., Cant, M. A., Nichols, H. J., and Hoffman, J. (2018). A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY 27, 2271-2288.
Wells, D.A., et al., 2018. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 27(9), p 2271-2288.
D.A. Wells, et al., “A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal”, MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, vol. 27, 2018, pp. 2271-2288.
Wells, D.A., Cant, M.A., Nichols, H.J., Hoffman, J.: A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY. 27, 2271-2288 (2018).
Wells, David A., Cant, Michael A., Nichols, Hazel J., and Hoffman, Joseph. “A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal”. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY 27.9 (2018): 2271-2288.

1 Zitation in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Live long and prosper: durable benefits of early-life care in banded mongooses.
Vitikainen EIK, Thompson FJ, Marshall HH, Cant MA., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 374(1770), 2019
PMID: 30966878

86 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments.
Armbruster P, Reed DH., Heredity (Edinb) 95(3), 2005
PMID: 16077737
Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations?
Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T., Mol. Ecol. 13(10), 2004
PMID: 15367117
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4
Bates, Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 2015
Selection for heterozygosity gives hope to a wild population of inbred wolves.
Bensch S, Andren H, Hansson B, Pedersen HC, Sand H, Sejberg D, Wabakken P, Akesson M, Liberg O., PLoS ONE 1(), 2006
PMID: 17183704
An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck.
Bierne N, Tsitrone A, David P., Genetics 155(4), 2000
PMID: 10924490
Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses.
Cant MA., Anim Behav 59(1), 2000
PMID: 10640376
Banded mongooses: Demography, life history, and social behavior
Cant, Cooperative breeding in vertebrates: Studies of ecology, evolution, and behavior (), 2016
Eviction and dispersal in co-operatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungos mungo)
Cant, Journal of Zoology 254(2), 2001
Demography and Social Evolution of Banded Mongooses
Cant MA, Vitikainen E, Nichols HJ., Advances in the study of behavior. 45(), 2013
PMID: IND601117735
A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations.
Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC., Mol. Ecol. 18(13), 2009
PMID: 19500255
The genetics of inbreeding depression.
Charlesworth D, Willis JH., Nat. Rev. Genet. 10(11), 2009
PMID: 19834483
Genomic Consequences of Population Decline in the Endangered Florida Scrub-Jay.
Chen N, Cosgrove EJ, Bowman R, Fitzpatrick JW, Clark AG., Curr. Biol. 26(21), 2016
PMID: 27746026

Cox, 1989
Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data.
David P, Pujol B, Viard F, Castella V, Goudet J., Mol. Ecol. 16(12), 2007
PMID: 17561907
Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance
Dormann, Ecography 36(1), 2013

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Fisher, 1965
Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B., Mol. Ecol. 21(13), 2012
PMID: 22554318
AD Model Builder: Using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models
Fournier, Optimization Methods and Software 27(2), 2012
Pup escorting in the communal breeding banded mongoose: Behavior, benefits, and maintenance
Gilchrist, Behavioral Ecology 15(6), 2004
Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers.
Hansson B, Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Akesson M., Proc. Biol. Sci. 268(1473), 2001
PMID: 11410156
Does linkage disequilibrium generate heterozygosity-fitness correlations in great reed warblers?
Hansson B, Westerdahl H, Hasselquist D, Akesson M, Bensch S., Evolution 58(4), 2004
PMID: 15154561
Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue.
Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 31(12), 2016
PMID: 27743611
Genomic variation of inbreeding and ancestry in the remaining two Isle Royale wolves
Hedrick, Journal of Heredity 108(2), 2016
Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird.
Hemmings NL, Slate J, Birkhead TR., Nat Commun 3(), 2012
PMID: 22643890
Counting the costs: The evolution of male-biased care in the cooperatively breeding banded mongoose
Hodge, Animal Behaviour 74(4), 2007
High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population.
Hoffman JI, Simpson F, David P, Rijks JM, Kuiken T, Thorne MA, Lacy RC, Dasmahapatra KK., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111(10), 2014
PMID: 24586051
Inbreeding depression across the lifespan in a wild mammal population.
Huisman J, Kruuk LE, Ellis PA, Clutton-Brock T, Pemberton JM., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113(13), 2016
PMID: 26979959
Increased prenatal maternal investment reduces inbreeding depression in offspring.
Ihle KE, Hutter P, Tschirren B., Proc. Biol. Sci. 284(1860), 2017
PMID: 28794224
Scent marking within and between groups of wild banded mongooses
Jordan, Journal of Zoology 280(1), 2010
Genomic consequences of intensive inbreeding in an isolated wolf population.
Kardos M, Akesson M, Fountain T, Flagstad O, Liberg O, Olason P, Sand H, Wabakken P, Wikenros C, Ellegren H., Nat Ecol Evol 2(1), 2017
PMID: 29158554
Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
Kardos M, Luikart G, Allendorf FW., Heredity (Edinb) 115(1), 2015
PMID: 26059970
Inbreeding effects in wild populations
Keller, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17(5), 2002
Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding.
Knief U, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W., Heredity (Edinb) 118(3), 2016
PMID: 27804967

Lynch, 1998
Lifetime fitness consequences of early-life ecological hardship in a wild mammal population.
Marshall HH, Vitikainen EI, Mwanguhya F, Businge R, Kyabulima S, Hares MC, Inzani E, Kalema-Zikusoka G, Mwesige K, Nichols HJ, Sanderson JL, Thompson FJ, Cant MA., Ecol Evol 7(6), 2017
PMID: 28331582
Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.
Meagher S, Penn DJ, Potts WK., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97(7), 2000
PMID: 10716731
Estimating genome-wide heterozygosity: effects of demographic history and marker type.
Miller JM, Malenfant RM, David P, Davis CS, Poissant J, Hogg JT, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW., Heredity (Edinb) 112(3), 2013
PMID: 24149650
Heterozygosity but not inbreeding coefficient predicts parasite burdens in the banded mongoose
Mitchell, Journal of Zoology 302(1), 2017

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models
Nakagawa, Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2), 2013
The causes and consequences of inbreeding avoidance and tolerance in cooperatively breeding vertebrates
Nichols, Journal of Zoology 303(1), 2017
Top males gain high reproductive success by guarding more successful females in a cooperatively breeding mongoose
Nichols, Animal Behaviour 80(4), 2010
Evidence for frequent incest in a cooperatively breeding mammal.
Nichols HJ, Cant MA, Hoffman JI, Sanderson JL., Biol. Lett. 10(12), 2014
PMID: 25540153
Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal.
Nichols HJ, Cant MA, Sanderson JL., Behav. Ecol. 26(6), 2015
PMID: 26609201
Inbreeding and inbreeding depression of early life traits in a cooperative mammal.
Nielsen JF, English S, Goodall-Copestake WP, Wang J, Walling CA, Bateman AW, Flower TP, Sutcliffe RL, Samson J, Thavarajah NK, Kruuk LE, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM., Mol. Ecol. 21(11), 2012
PMID: 22497583
Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population.
Nietlisbach P, Keller LF, Camenisch G, Guillaume F, Arcese P, Reid JM, Postma E., Proc. Biol. Sci. 284(1850), 2017
PMID: 28250184
Inbreeding depression in a critically endangered carnivore.
Noren K, Godoy E, Dalen L, Meijer T, Angerbjorn A., Mol. Ecol. 25(14), 2016
PMID: 27135988
Explained randomness in proportional hazards models.
O'Quigley J, Xu R, Stare J., Stat Med 24(3), 2005
PMID: 15532086
Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best.
Pemberton J., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 19(12), 2004
PMID: 16701322
Wild pedigrees: the way forward.
Pemberton JM., Proc. Biol. Sci. 275(1635), 2008
PMID: 18211868
Parental care buffers against inbreeding depression in burying beetles.
Pilakouta N, Jamieson S, Moorad JA, Smiseth PT., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112(26), 2015
PMID: 26080412

R, 2014
Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences.
Reed DH, Fox CW, Enders LS, Kristensen TN., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1256(), 2012
PMID: 22583046
Pedigree error due to extra-pair reproduction substantially biases estimates of inbreeding depression.
Reid JM, Keller LF, Marr AB, Nietlisbach P, Sardell RJ, Arcese P., Evolution 68(3), 2013
PMID: 24171712
Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: The utility of the IT-AIC framework
Richards, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(1), 2011
Banded mongooses avoid inbreeding when mating with members of the same natal group.
Sanderson JL, Wang J, Vitikainen EI, Cant MA, Nichols HJ., Mol. Ecol. 24(14), 2015
PMID: 26095171

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data.
Slate J, David P, Dodds KG, Veenvliet BA, Glass BC, Broad TE, McEwan JC., Heredity (Edinb) 93(3), 2004
PMID: 15254488
The distribution of the fraction of the genome identical by descent in finite random mating populations
Stam, Genetical Research 35(2), 1980
inbreedR: An R package for the analysis of inbreeding based on genetic markers
Stoffel, Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7(11), 2016
A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion
Symonds, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65(1), 2011
Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: a time for reappraisal.
Szulkin M, Bierne N, David P., Evolution 64(5), 2010
PMID: 20148954
Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?
Szulkin M, Stopher KV, Pemberton JM, Reid JM., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 28(4), 2012
PMID: 23182684
Inbreeding coefficient and heterozygosity-fitness correlations in unhatched and hatched song sparrow nestmates.
Taylor SS, Sardell RJ, Reid JM, Bucher T, Taylor NG, Arcese P, Keller LF., Mol. Ecol. 19(20), 2010
PMID: 20854411

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Reproductive competition triggers mass eviction in cooperative banded mongooses.
Thompson FJ, Marshall HH, Sanderson JL, Vitikainen EI, Nichols HJ, Gilchrist JS, Young AJ, Hodge SJ, Cant MA., Proc. Biol. Sci. 283(1826), 2016
PMID: 26936245
Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance.
Thunken T, Bakker TC, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H., Curr. Biol. 17(3), 2007
PMID: 17276915
Effect of mating structure on variation in inbreeding
Weir, Theoretical Population Biology 18(3), 1980

Zuur, 2009

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 29603504
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar