Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments

Barlas Z, Kopp S (2018)
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 137.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 1.30 MB
DOI
URN
urn:nbn:de:0070-pub-29188457
Autor*in
Barlas, ZeynepUniBi ; Kopp, StefanUniBi
Einrichtung
Technische Fakultät > AG Kognitive Systeme und soziale Interaktion
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Abstract / Bemerkung
Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the subjective experience that one is in control of their actions and the consequences of these actions. The SoA is a complex phenomenon, influenced by a weighted combination of various prospective (pre-movement) and retrospective (post-movement) processes and factors related to action choice, action selection fluency, action-outcome associations and higher-level inferences. In the current study, we examined the effect of the congruency between actions and outcomes in a context where the choice-level of actions was varied from 1 to 4. The actions consisted of right, left, up and down key presses while the outcomes were visual representations of the actions (i.e., right, left, up and down-pointing arrowheads). Participants performed either an instructed action or freely selected an action among two, three, or four alternatives. Each action randomly produced either a congruent or an incongruent outcome, depending on the matching between the direction of the key press and the direction of the outcome arrowhead. Participants estimated the delay between their actions and the observed outcomes and reported their feeling of control (FoC) over the outcomes. Interval estimations were used as an indirect measure of the SoA to quantify the intentional binding effect, which refers to the perceived temporal attraction between voluntary actions and their outcomes. The results showed that both intentional binding and FoC were enhanced as the choice-level was increased from 1 to 4. Additionally, intentional binding and FoC over the outcomes were stronger when actions produced congruent compared to incongruent outcomes. These results provide additional evidence that both intentional binding and FoC are sensitive to the number of action alternatives and the congruency between actions and their outcomes. Importantly, the current study suggests that these prospective and retrospective cues might independently influence intentional binding and FoC judgments.
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Band
12
Art.-Nr.
137
Urheberrecht / Lizenzen
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0)
ISSN
1662-5161
eISSN
1662-5161
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2918845

Zitieren

Barlas Z, Kopp S. Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2018;12: 137.
Barlas, Z., & Kopp, S. (2018). Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 137. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00137
Barlas, Zeynep, and Kopp, Stefan. 2018. “Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 137.
Barlas, Z., and Kopp, S. (2018). Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12:137.
Barlas, Z., & Kopp, S., 2018. Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12: 137.
Z. Barlas and S. Kopp, “Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 12, 2018, : 137.
Barlas, Z., Kopp, S.: Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 12, : 137 (2018).
Barlas, Zeynep, and Kopp, Stefan. “Action choice and outcome congruency independently affect intentional binding and feeling of control judgments”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12 (2018): 137.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
cc_by_4_0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.de
Volltext(e)
Name
1.30 MB
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:18:58Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
42c675bf0a34ce8c39438f04e7c233c6


Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

69 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

The effects of freedom of choice in action selection on perceived mental effort and the sense of agency.
Barlas Z, Hockley WE, Obhi SS., Acta Psychol (Amst) 180(), 2017
PMID: 28942124
Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control.
Barlas Z, Hockley WE, Obhi SS., Exp Brain Res 236(1), 2017
PMID: 29080100
Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency.
Barlas Z, Obhi SS., Front Hum Neurosci 7(), 2013
PMID: 24009575
Cultural background influences implicit but not explicit sense of agency for the production of musical tones.
Barlas Z, Obhi SS., Conscious Cogn 28(), 2014
PMID: 25051499
Abnormalities in the awareness of action.
Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 6(6), 2002
PMID: 12039604
Choosing, Doing, and Controlling: Implicit Sense of Agency Over Somatosensory Events.
Borhani K, Beck B, Haggard P., Psychol Sci 28(7), 2017
PMID: 28488908
Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain.
Caspar EA, Christensen JF, Cleeremans A, Haggard P., Curr. Biol. 26(5), 2016
PMID: 26898470
The relationship between human agency and embodiment.
Caspar EA, Cleeremans A, Haggard P., Conscious Cogn 33(), 2015
PMID: 25655206
Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance.
Chambon V, Haggard P., Cognition 125(3), 2012
PMID: 22902284
From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?
Chambon V, Sidarus N, Haggard P., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24860486
An online neural substrate for sense of agency.
Chambon V, Wenke D, Fleming SM, Prinz W, Haggard P., Cereb. Cortex 23(5), 2012
PMID: 22510529
Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction.
Desantis A, Hughes G, Waszak F., PLoS ONE 7(1), 2012
PMID: 22272237
Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation.
Desantis A, Weiss C, Schutz-Bosbach S, Waszak F., PLoS ONE 7(5), 2012
PMID: 22666424
On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency.
Desantis A, Roussel C, Waszak F., Conscious Cogn 20(4), 2011
PMID: 21396831
Do implicit and explicit measures of the sense of agency measure the same thing?
Dewey JA, Knoblich G., PLoS ONE 9(10), 2014
PMID: 25330184
Time warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events.
Ebert JP, Wegner DM., Conscious Cogn 19(1), 2009
PMID: 19896868
Effect anticipation and action control.
Elsner B, Hommel B., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(1), 2001
PMID: 11248937
Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered.
Engbert K, Wohlschlager A, Haggard P., Cognition 107(2), 2007
PMID: 17825813
Agency, subjective time, and other minds.
Engbert K, Wohlschlager A, Thomas R, Haggard P., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(6), 2007
PMID: 18085941
Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency.
Farrer C, Bouchereau M, Jeannerod M, Franck N., Behav Neurol 19(1-2), 2008
PMID: 18413918
The time windows of the sense of agency.
Farrer C, Valentin G, Hupe JM., Conscious Cogn 22(4), 2013
PMID: 24161792
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG., Behav Res Methods 41(4), 2009
PMID: 19897823
The self in action: lessons from delusions of control.
Frith C., Conscious Cogn 14(4), 2005
PMID: 16098765
Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action.
Frith CD, Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 355(1404), 2000
PMID: 11205340
Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher I I., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 4(1), 2000
PMID: 10637618
Mine is Earlier than Yours: Causal Beliefs Influence the Perceived Time of Action Effects.
Haering C, Kiesel A., Front Psychol 3(), 2012
PMID: 23060848
Intentional Binding is independent of the validity of the action effect's identity.
Haering C, Kiesel A., Acta Psychol (Amst) 152(), 2014
PMID: 25208843
Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will.
Haggard P., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9(12), 2008
PMID: 19020512
Sense of agency in the human brain.
Haggard P., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18(4), 2017
PMID: 28251993
Sense of agency.
Haggard P, Chambon V., Curr. Biol. 22(10), 2012
PMID: 22625851
Voluntary action and conscious awareness.
Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J., Nat. Neurosci. 5(4), 2002
PMID: 11896397
The experience of agency: feelings, judgments, and responsibility
Haggard, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18(), 2009
Contrast analysis
Hervé, 2010
Anticipatory behavioral control
Hoffmann, 2003
Action control and the sense of agency
Hommel, 2015
Acquisition and generalization of action effects
Hommel, Vis. Cogn. 10(), 2003
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning
Hommel, Behav. Brain Sci. 24(), 2001

James, 1890
Feeling in control: Neural correlates of experience of agency.
Kuhn S, Brass M, Haggard P., Cortex 49(7), 2012
PMID: 23067726
Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control.
Linser K, Goschke T., Cognition 104(3), 2006
PMID: 16996491
Metacognition of agency.
Metcalfe J, Greene MJ., J Exp Psychol Gen 136(2), 2007
PMID: 17500645
Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches.
Moore JW, Fletcher PC., Conscious Cogn 21(1), 2011
PMID: 21920777
Awareness of action: Inference and prediction.
Moore J, Haggard P., Conscious Cogn 17(1), 2007
PMID: 17306565
Intentional binding and higher order agency experience.
Moore JW, Haggard P., Conscious Cogn 19(1), 2010
PMID: 20045656
Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review.
Moore JW, Obhi SS., Conscious Cogn 21(1), 2012
PMID: 22240158
Modulating the sense of agency with external cues.
Moore JW, Wegner DM, Haggard P., Conscious Cogn 18(4), 2009
PMID: 19515577
PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.
Peirce JW., J. Neurosci. Methods 162(1-2), 2007
PMID: 17254636
Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy.
Peirce JW., Front Neuroinform 2(), 2008
PMID: 19198666
Discrepancy between explicit judgement of agency and implicit feeling of agency: Implications for sense of agency and its disorders.
Saito N, Takahata K, Murai T, Takahashi H., Conscious Cogn 37(), 2015
PMID: 26253893
Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership.
Sato A, Yasuda A., Cognition 94(3), 2005
PMID: 15617673
Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.
Sebanz N, Lackner U., Conscious Cogn 16(4), 2006
PMID: 17045811
What is the Bereitschaftspotential?
Shibasaki H, Hallett M., Clin Neurophysiol 117(11), 2006
PMID: 16876476
Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes.
Sidarus N, Chambon V, Haggard P., Conscious Cogn 22(4), 2013
PMID: 24185190
Difficult action decisions reduce the sense of agency: A study using the Eriksen flanker task.
Sidarus N, Haggard P., Acta Psychol (Amst) 166(), 2016
PMID: 27017411
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study.
Sidarus N, Vuorre M, Haggard P., Neuroimage 150(), 2017
PMID: 28188916
Investigating the Prospective Sense of Agency: Effects of Processing Fluency, Stimulus Ambiguity, and Response Conflict.
Sidarus N, Vuorre M, Metcalfe J, Haggard P., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 28450839
Me or not me--an optimal integration of agency cues?
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Lindner A., Conscious Cogn 18(4), 2009
PMID: 19683460
Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency.
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A., Conscious Cogn 17(1), 2007
PMID: 17482480
I move, therefore I am: a new theoretical framework to investigate agency and ownership.
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Newen A., Conscious Cogn 17(2), 2008
PMID: 18411059
The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction.
Synofzik M, Vosgerau G, Voss M., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23508565
The relation between the sense of agency and the experience of flow.
Vuorre M, Metcalfe J., Conscious Cogn 43(), 2016
PMID: 27288822
Precis of the illusion of conscious will.
Wegner DM., Behav Brain Sci 27(5), 2004
PMID: 15895616
Authorship processing
Wegner, 2004
Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will.
Wegner DM, Wheatley T., Am Psychol 54(7), 1999
PMID: 10424155
Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action.
Wenke D, Fleming SM, Haggard P., Cognition 115(1), 2009
PMID: 19945697
How voluntary actions modulate time perception.
Wenke D, Haggard P., Exp Brain Res 196(3), 2009
PMID: 19471909
Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding.
Wolpe N, Haggard P, Siebner HR, Rowe JB., Exp Brain Res 229(3), 2013
PMID: 23371752
Computational approaches to motor control.
Wolpert DM., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 1(6), 1997
PMID: 21223909
An internal model for sensorimotor integration.
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI., Science 269(5232), 1995
PMID: 7569931
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 29695958
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar