On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga
Jukola S (2017)
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES 62: 35-41.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Abstract / Bemerkung
By using Stegenga's article Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence as a case study, this paper shows how different notions of objectivity can affect discussions concerning medical research. I argue that the ideal of objectivity that underlies Stegenga's article is both unattainable in practice and insufficient and unnecessary in principle to capture some of the ways in which biases may enter medical knowledge production. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Stichworte
Objectivity;
Bias;
Medical research;
Meta-analysis
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Zeitschriftentitel
STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES
Band
62
Seite(n)
35-41
ISSN
1369-8486
eISSN
1879-2499
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2916557
Zitieren
Jukola S. On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES. 2017;62:35-41.
Jukola, S. (2017). On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, 62, 35-41. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.02.001
Jukola, Saana. 2017. “On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga”. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES 62: 35-41.
Jukola, S. (2017). On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES 62, 35-41.
Jukola, S., 2017. On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, 62, p 35-41.
S. Jukola, “On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga”, STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES, vol. 62, 2017, pp. 35-41.
Jukola, S.: On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES. 62, 35-41 (2017).
Jukola, Saana. “On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga”. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PART C-STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDIAL SCIENCES 62 (2017): 35-41.
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
1 Zitation in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Validity Beyond Measurement: Why Psychometric Validity Is Insufficient for Valid Psychotherapy Research.
Truijens FL, Cornelis S, Desmet M, De Smet MM, Meganck R., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 30915008
Truijens FL, Cornelis S, Desmet M, De Smet MM, Meganck R., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 30915008
38 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data
Begg, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 151(3), 1988
Begg, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 151(3), 1988
Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: the role of differential guessing tendencies
Ben-Shakhar, Journal of Educational Measurement 28(1), 1991
Ben-Shakhar, Journal of Educational Measurement 28(1), 1991
Lessons from the vioxx Debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology
Biddle, Social Epistemology 21(1), 2007
Biddle, Social Epistemology 21(1), 2007
Bloor, 1997
Broadbent, 2013
Is stability a stable category in medical epistemology?
Broadbent, Angewandte Philosophie 2(1), 2015
Broadbent, Angewandte Philosophie 2(1), 2015
Values in science beyond underdetermination and inductive risk
Brown, Philosophy of Science 80(5), 2013
Brown, Philosophy of Science 80(5), 2013
Research under Pressure: Methodological features of commercialized science
Carrier, 2010
Carrier, 2010
Daston, 2007
Inductive risk and values in science
Douglas, Philosophy of Science 67(), 2000
Douglas, Philosophy of Science 67(), 2000
The irreducible complexity of objectivity
Douglas, Synthese 138(), 2004
Douglas, Synthese 138(), 2004
Douglas, 2009
Association between suicide attempts and selective serotonin reuptake Inhibitors: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Fergusson, British Medical Journal 330(), 2005
Fergusson, British Medical Journal 330(), 2005
Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing between One's own ideas and academic success
Frey, Public Choice 116(), 2003
Frey, Public Choice 116(), 2003
Let's not talk about objectivity
Hacking, 2015
Hacking, 2015
Howick, 2011
Why most published research findings are false
Ioannidis, PloS Medicine 2(8), 2005
Ioannidis, PloS Medicine 2(8), 2005
Jukola, 2015
Kitcher, 1993
Kripke, 1982
Bias in peer review. Advances in information science
Lee, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1), 2013
Lee, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1), 2013
Longino, 1990
Industry-sponsorship and research outcome
Lundh, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12(), 2012
Lundh, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 12(), 2012
Until RCT proven? On the asymmetry of evidence requirements for risk assessment.
Osimani B., J Eval Clin Pract 19(3), 2013
PMID: 23692227
Osimani B., J Eval Clin Pract 19(3), 2013
PMID: 23692227
Efficacy and effectiveness of Antidepressants: Current status of research
Pigott, Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics 79(), 2010
Pigott, Psychotherapy & Psychosomatics 79(), 2010
The age-old struggle against the antivaccinationists.
Poland GA, Jacobson RM., N. Engl. J. Med. 364(2), 2011
PMID: 21226573
Poland GA, Jacobson RM., N. Engl. J. Med. 364(2), 2011
PMID: 21226573
Porter, 1997
Biomedical research, neglected disease, and well-ordered science
Reiss, Theoria 66(), 2009
Reiss, Theoria 66(), 2009
How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: causal structures and responses.
Sismondo S., Soc Sci Med 66(9), 2008
PMID: 18299169
Sismondo S., Soc Sci Med 66(9), 2008
PMID: 18299169
Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: a qualitative systematic review.
Sismondo S., Contemp Clin Trials 29(2), 2007
PMID: 17919992
Sismondo S., Contemp Clin Trials 29(2), 2007
PMID: 17919992
Publication ethics and the ghost management of medical publication.
Sismondo S, Doucet M., Bioethics 24(6), 2009
PMID: 19222451
Sismondo S, Doucet M., Bioethics 24(6), 2009
PMID: 19222451
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?
Stegenga J., Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 42(4), 2011
PMID: 22035723
Stegenga J., Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 42(4), 2011
PMID: 22035723
Tabery, 2014
Benefits and risks of drug treatments. How to combine the best evidence on benefits with the best data about adverse effects
Vandenbroucke, JAMA 300(20), 2006
Vandenbroucke, JAMA 300(20), 2006
Bias and values in scientific research
Wilholt, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(), 2009
Wilholt, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(), 2009
Epistemic trust in science
Wilholt, The British Journal for the Philosophy of the Science 64(2), 2013
Wilholt, The British Journal for the Philosophy of the Science 64(2), 2013
Ziman, 2000
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 28188111
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in
Google Scholar