Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges

Brzoska P, Sauzet O, Breckenkamp J (2017)
International Journal of Public Health 62(4): 517-520.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
Brzoska, Patrick; Sauzet, OdileUniBi; Breckenkamp, JürgenUniBi
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften > AG 3 Epidemiologie & International Public Health
Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Lehrstuhl für Statistik und Datenanalyse
Zentrum für Statistik
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Zeitschriftentitel
International Journal of Public Health
Band
62
Ausgabe
4
Seite(n)
517-520
ISSN
1661-8556
eISSN
1661-8564
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2914860

Zitieren

Brzoska P, Sauzet O, Breckenkamp J. Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Public Health. 2017;62(4):517-520.
Brzoska, P., Sauzet, O., & Breckenkamp, J. (2017). Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Public Health, 62(4), 517-520. doi:10.1007/s00038-016-0918-5
Brzoska, Patrick, Sauzet, Odile, and Breckenkamp, Jürgen. 2017. “Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges”. International Journal of Public Health 62 (4): 517-520.
Brzoska, P., Sauzet, O., and Breckenkamp, J. (2017). Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Public Health 62, 517-520.
Brzoska, P., Sauzet, O., & Breckenkamp, J., 2017. Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Public Health, 62(4), p 517-520.
P. Brzoska, O. Sauzet, and J. Breckenkamp, “Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges”, International Journal of Public Health, vol. 62, 2017, pp. 517-520.
Brzoska, P., Sauzet, O., Breckenkamp, J.: Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges. International Journal of Public Health. 62, 517-520 (2017).
Brzoska, Patrick, Sauzet, Odile, and Breckenkamp, Jürgen. “Unobserved heterogeneity and the comparison of coefficients across nested logistic regression models: how to avoid comparing apples and oranges”. International Journal of Public Health 62.4 (2017): 517-520.

3 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect.
MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM., Prev Sci 1(4), 2000
PMID: 11523746
Utilization and effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in foreign nationals residing in Germany.
Brzoska P, Voigtlander S, Spallek J, Razum O., Eur. J. Epidemiol. 25(9), 2010
PMID: 20571880
Self-rated treatment outcomes in medical rehabilitation among German and non-German nationals residing in Germany: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
Brzoska P, Sauzet O, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Widera T, Razum O., BMC Health Serv Res 16(), 2016
PMID: 27020703
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 27812725
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar