The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence

Reisenzein R, Horstmann G, Schützwohl A (2019)
Topics in Cognitive Science 11(1): 50-74.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Research on surprise relevant to the cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise proposed by Meyer, Reisenzein, and Schutzwohl (1997) is reviewed. The majority of the assumptions of the model are found empirically supported. Surprise is evoked by unexpected (schema-discrepant) events and its intensity is determined by the degree if schema-discrepancy, whereas the novelty and the valence of the eliciting events probably do not have an independent effect. Unexpected events cause an automatic interruption of ongoing mental processes that is followed by an attentional shift and attentional binding to the events, which is often followed by causal and other event analysis processes and by schema revision. The facial expression of surprise postulated by evolutionary emotion psychologists has been found to occur rarely in surprise, for as yet unknown reasons. A physiological orienting response marked by skin conductance increase, heart rate deceleration, and pupil dilation has been observed to occur regularly in the standard version of the repetition-change paradigm of surprise induction, but the specificity of these reactions as indicators of surprise is controversial. There is indirect evidence for the assumption that the feeling of surprise consists of the direct awareness of the schema-discrepancy signal, but this feeling, or at least the self-report of surprise, is also influenced by experienced interference. In contrast, facial feedback probably does contribute substantially to the feeling of surprise and the evidence for the hypothesis that surprise is affected by the difficulty of explaining an unexpected event is, in our view, inconclusive. Regardless of how the surprise feeling is constituted, there is evidence that it has both motivational and informational effects. Finally, the prediction failure implied by unexpected events sometimes causes a negative feeling, but there is no convincing evidence that this is always the case, and we argue that even if it were so, this would not be a sufficient reason for regarding this feeling as a component, rather than as an effect of surprise. This paper reviews evidence regarding the cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: Surprise is evoked by unexpected events, causing automatic interruption of mental processes, and its intensity is determined by the degree of discrepancy from current schemas. The authors discuss evidence regarding the roles of physiological responses and direct awareness of the schema-discrepancy signal, but argue that, regardless of how surprise is constituted, there is evidence that it has both motivational and informational effects.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Topics in Cognitive Science
Band
11
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
50-74
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Reisenzein R, Horstmann G, Schützwohl A. The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science. 2019;11(1):50-74.
Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2019). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 50-74. doi:10.1111/tops.12292
Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., and Schützwohl, A. (2019). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science 11, 50-74.
Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A., 2019. The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), p 50-74.
R. Reisenzein, G. Horstmann, and A. Schützwohl, “The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence”, Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 11, 2019, pp. 50-74.
Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., Schützwohl, A.: The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science. 11, 50-74 (2019).
Reisenzein, Rainer, Horstmann, Gernot, and Schützwohl, Achim. “The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise. A review of the evidence”. Topics in Cognitive Science 11.1 (2019): 50-74.

4 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

A Contrast-Based Computational Model of Surprise and Its Applications.
Macedo L, Cardoso A., Top Cogn Sci 11(1), 2019
PMID: 29152886
Storytelling as Adaptive Collective Sensemaking.
Bietti LM, Tilston O, Bangerter A., Top Cogn Sci (), 2018
PMID: 29954043
Surprise: unfolding of facial expressions.
Noordewier MK, van Dijk E., Cogn Emot (), 2018
PMID: 30185108

118 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor.
Alexander WH, Brown JW., Nat. Neurosci. 14(10), 2011
PMID: 21926982

Aristotle, 1980
Current emotion research in behavioral neuroscience: The role(s) of the amygdala
Armony, Emotion Review 5(), 2013
Surprise-induced blindness: A stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception
Asplund, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36(), 2010
Novelty or surprise?
Barto, Frontiers in Cognitive Science (), 2013
Children's and adults’ everyday talk about surprise
Bartsch, British Journal of Developmental Psychology 15(), 1997

Berlyne, 1960
Losses loom more likely than gains: Propensity to imagine losses increases their subjective probability
Bilgin, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 118(), 2012
A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function
Brandstätter, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15(), 2002

Charlesworth, 1969

Darwiche, 2009

Darwin, 1965
Surprise: A historical and experimental study
Desai, British Journal of Psychology, Monograph Supplements 22(), 1939

Dewhurst, 2017

Drayson, 2017
Emotion-specific effects of facial expressions and postures on emotional experience
Duclos, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(), 1989

Ekman, 1972
Free-energy and the brain.
Friston KJ, Stephan KE., Synthese 159(3), 2007
PMID: 19325932
Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: A feature-matching approach
Gati, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119(), 1990

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012
Surprise in the context of achievement: The role of outcome valence and importance
Gendolla, Motivation and Emotion 21(), 1997
Surprise and motivation of causal search: How are they affected by outcome valence and importance?
Gendolla, Motivation and Emotion 25(), 2001
When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review.
Greifeneder R, Bless H, Pham MT., Pers Soc Psychol Rev 15(2), 2010
PMID: 20495111

Heider, 1958

Hohwy, 2013
Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy
Horstmann, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31(), 2005
The surprise-attention link: a review.
Horstmann G., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1339(), 2015
PMID: 25682693
Surprise capture and inattentional blindness.
Horstmann G, Ansorge U., Cognition 157(), 2016
PMID: 27665396
Effects of stimulus-onset asynchrony and display duration on implicit and explicit measures of attentional capture by a surprising singleton
Horstmann, Visual Cognition 16(2-3), 2008
Perceptual salience captures the eyes on a surprise trial.
Horstmann G, Becker S, Ernst D., Atten Percept Psychophys 78(7), 2016
PMID: 27250362
Surprise attracts the eyes and binds the gaze.
Horstmann G, Herwig A., Psychon Bull Rev 22(3), 2015
PMID: 25199467
Novelty biases attention and gaze in a surprise trial.
Horstmann G, Herwig A., Atten Percept Psychophys 78(1), 2016
PMID: 26486643
Zum Einfluß der Verknüpfungsstärke von Schemaelementen auf die Stärke der Überrraschungsreaktion [Effect of strength of association of schema elements on the surprise reaction]
Horstmann, Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 45(), 1998

Hume, 1978

Isaacs, 1930
Bayesian surprise attracts human attention.
Itti L, Baldi P., Vision Res. 49(10), 2008
PMID: 18834898

Izard, 1971

James, 1950
Surprise is predicted by event probability, outcome valence, outcome meaningfulness, and gender
Juergensen, Motivation and Emotion 38(), 2014
Variants of uncertainty.
Kahneman D, Tversky A., Cognition 11(2), 1982
PMID: 7198958
Pupil size tracks perceptual content and surprise.
Kloosterman NA, Meindertsma T, van Loon AM, Lamme VA, Bonneh YS, Donner TH., Eur. J. Neurosci. 41(8), 2015
PMID: 25754528

Laird, 2007

Lazarus, 1991

Macedo, 2001
The exploration of unknown environments populated with entities by a surprise-curiosity-based agent
Macedo, Cognitive Systems Research 19(), 2012
A contrast-based computational model for forms of surprise and its applications
Macedo, Topics in Cognitive Science (), 2017

Macedo, 2009

Macedo, 2004
Making sense of surprise: An investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments
Maguire, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37(), 2011

Maher, 1979

McDougall, 1960
Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options
Mellers, Psychological Science 8(), 1997
Die Rolle von Überraschung im Attributionsprozeß [The role of surprise in the attribution process]
Meyer, Psychologische Rundschau 39(), 1988
An experimental analysis of surprise
Meyer, Cognition and Emotion 5(), 1991
Towards a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise
Meyer, Motivation and Emotion 21(), 1997

Miceli, 2015
The role of surprise in hindsight bias: A metacognitive model of reduced and reversed hindsight bias
Müller, Social Cognition 25(), 2007
Increased or reversed? The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component
Nestler, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35(), 2009
Temporal characteristics of the surprise reaction induced by schema-discrepant visual and auditory events
Niepel, Cognition & Emotion 8(), 1994
On the valence of surprise.
Noordewier MK, Breugelmans SM., Cogn Emot 27(7), 2013
PMID: 23560688
Towards a cognitive theory of emotions
Oatley, Cognition and Emotion 1(), 1987

Öhman, 2000
Dissociable effects of surprise and model update in parietal and anterior cingulate cortex.
O'Reilly JX, Schuffelgen U, Cuell SF, Behrens TE, Mars RB, Rushworth MF., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(38), 2013
PMID: 23986499

Ortony, 1988

Ortony, 1987
Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline's Role in Decision Making.
Preuschoff K, 't Hart BM, Einhauser W., Front Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 21994487
Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model
Pyszczynski, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20(), 1987

Reisenzein, 2000
Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise
Reisenzein, Cognition and Emotion 14(), 2000

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief-desire theory of emotion
Reisenzein, Cognitive Systems Research 10(), 2009

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Evidence for strong dissociation between emotion and facial displays: the case of surprise.
Reisenzein R, Bordgen S, Holtbernd T, Matz D., J Pers Soc Psychol 91(2), 2006
PMID: 16881766

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Reisenzein, 2012

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Coherence between emotion and facial expression: Evidence from laboratory experiments
Reisenzein, Emotion Review 5(), 2013
Oculomotor Capture by New and Unannounced Color Singletons during Visual Search.
Retell JD, Venini D, Becker SI., Atten Percept Psychophys 77(5), 2015
PMID: 25832190

Ribot, 1896

Rumelhart, 1984
How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: The role of unexpected events
Rünger, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34(), 2008

Schank, 1986

Scherer, 2001
The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing
Schröger, Acta Acustica United With Acustica 91(), 2005
Surprise and schema strength
Schützwohl, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(), 1998
The processing of affectively valenced stimuli: The role of surprise
Schützwohl, Cognition & Emotion 19(), 2005
Die Struktur der Intensität von Überraschung [The structure of the intensity of surprise]
Schützwohl, Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 48(), 2001
Children's and adults’ reactions to a schema-discrepant event: A developmental analysis of surprise
Schützwohl, International Journal for Behavioral Development 23(), 1999
Facial expressions in response to a highly surprising event exceeding the field of vision: A test of Darwin's theory of surprise
Schützwohl, Evolution and Human Behavior 33(), 2012
Data-driven sequence learning or search: What are the prerequisites for the generation of explicit sequence knowledge?
Schwager S, Runger D, Gaschler R, Frensch PA., Adv Cogn Psychol 8(2), 2012
PMID: 22723812

Shand, 1914
Effects of stimulus preexposure and intermodality change on electrodermal orienting.
Siddle DA, Lipp OV, Dall PJ., Psychophysiology 31(5), 1994
PMID: 7972596
Orienting, habituation, and the allocation of processing resources
Siddle, Attention and information processing in infants and adults: Perspectives from human and animal research (), 1992

Smedslund, 1990

Smith, 1982

Smith, 1981
Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex.
SOKOLOV EN., Annu. Rev. Physiol. 25(), 1963
PMID: 13977960
The role of surprise in the attribution process
Stiensmeier-Pelster, Cognition and Emotion 9(), 1995

Storck, 1995
When are successes more surprising than failures?
Teigen, Cognition & Emotion 16(), 2002
Surprises: low probabilities or high contrasts?
Teigen KH, Keren G., Cognition 87(2), 2003
PMID: 12590038

Tomkins, 1962
Corrugator activity confirms immediate negative affect in surprise.
Topolinski S, Strack F., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25762956
Broken expectations: Violations of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention
Vachon, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38(), 2012
"Spontaneous" causal thinking.
Weiner B., Psychol Bull 97(1), 1985
PMID: 3983298
When people ask” why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search
Wong, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(), 1981

Wundt, 1906

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 28940761
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar