The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology
Scheele A (2005)
Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research 11(1): 14-25.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr
2005
Zeitschriftentitel
Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research
Band
11
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
14-25
ISSN
1024-2589
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2912488
Zitieren
Scheele A. The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research. 2005;11(1):14-25.
Scheele, A. (2005). The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research, 11(1), 14-25.
Scheele, Alexandra. 2005. “The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology”. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research 11 (1): 14-25.
Scheele, A. (2005). The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research 11, 14-25.
Scheele, A., 2005. The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research, 11(1), p 14-25.
A. Scheele, “The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology”, Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research, vol. 11, 2005, pp. 14-25.
Scheele, A.: The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research. 11, 14-25 (2005).
Scheele, Alexandra. “The Future of Work - What Kind of Work? Impacts of Gender on the Definition of Work and Research Methodology”. Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research 11.1 (2005): 14-25.
Google Scholar