Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling

Herzberg F (2017)
Economics Letters 151: 44-47.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Zeitschriftentitel
Economics Letters
Band
151
Seite(n)
44-47
ISSN
0165-1765
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2908114

Zitieren

Herzberg F. Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling. Economics Letters. 2017;151:44-47.
Herzberg, F. (2017). Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling. Economics Letters, 151, 44-47. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.012
Herzberg, Frederik. 2017. “Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling”. Economics Letters 151: 44-47.
Herzberg, F. (2017). Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling. Economics Letters 151, 44-47.
Herzberg, F., 2017. Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling. Economics Letters, 151, p 44-47.
F. Herzberg, “Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling”, Economics Letters, vol. 151, 2017, pp. 44-47.
Herzberg, F.: Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling. Economics Letters. 151, 44-47 (2017).
Herzberg, Frederik. “Respect for experts vs. respect for unanimity: The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling”. Economics Letters 151 (2017): 44-47.
Material in PUB:
Frühere Version
Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling
Herzberg F (2014) Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers; 513.
Bielefeld: Center for Mathematical Economics.
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Suchen in

Google Scholar