Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae

Soudi S, Reinhold K, Engqvist L (2016)
EVOLUTION 70(12): 2889-2898.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Abstract / Bemerkung
One of the major goals in speciation research is to understand which isolation mechanisms form the first barriers to gene flow. This requires examining lineages that are still in the process of divergence or incipient species. Here, we investigate the presence of behavioral and several cryptic barriers between the sympatric willow and birch host races of Lochmaea capreae. Behavioral isolation did not have any profound effect on preventing gene flow. Yet despite pairs mating indiscriminately, no offspring were produced from the heterospecific matings between birch females and willow males due to the inability of males to transfer sperm to females. We found evidence for differences in genital morphology that may contribute to failed insemination attempts during copulation. The heterospecific matings between willow females and birch males resulted in viable offspring. Yet fecundity and hatchability was remarkably reduced, which is likely the result of lower efficiency in sperm transportation and storage and lower survival of sperm in the foreign reproductive tract. Our results provide evidence for the contribution of several postmating-prezygotic barriers that predate behavioral isolation and act as primary inhibitors of gene flow in this system. This is a surprising, yet perhaps often overlooked feature of barriers acting early in sympatric speciation process.
Stichworte
Hybridization; mate recognition; sexual selection; speciation; sperm
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Zeitschriftentitel
EVOLUTION
Band
70
Ausgabe
12
Seite(n)
2889-2898
ISSN
0014-3820
eISSN
1558-5646
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2907718

Zitieren

Soudi S, Reinhold K, Engqvist L. Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae. EVOLUTION. 2016;70(12):2889-2898.
Soudi, S., Reinhold, K., & Engqvist, L. (2016). Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae. EVOLUTION, 70(12), 2889-2898. doi:10.1111/evo.13083
Soudi, Shaghayegh, Reinhold, Klaus, and Engqvist, Leif. 2016. “Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae”. EVOLUTION 70 (12): 2889-2898.
Soudi, S., Reinhold, K., and Engqvist, L. (2016). Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae. EVOLUTION 70, 2889-2898.
Soudi, S., Reinhold, K., & Engqvist, L., 2016. Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae. EVOLUTION, 70(12), p 2889-2898.
S. Soudi, K. Reinhold, and L. Engqvist, “Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae”, EVOLUTION, vol. 70, 2016, pp. 2889-2898.
Soudi, S., Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L.: Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae. EVOLUTION. 70, 2889-2898 (2016).
Soudi, Shaghayegh, Reinhold, Klaus, and Engqvist, Leif. “Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae”. EVOLUTION 70.12 (2016): 2889-2898.

1 Zitation in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

66 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4
Bates, R package version 1(), 2013
Sympatric speciation: models and emprical evidence
Bolnick, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 38(), 2007
Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation between incipient outcrossing and selfing Clarkia species.
Briscoe Runquist RD, Chu E, Iverson JL, Kopp JC, Moeller DA., Evolution 68(10), 2014
PMID: 25041516
What do we need to know about speciation
Butlin, Trends Ecol. Evol 27(), 2012
Sperm transfer, displacement and precedence in Ischnura graellsii (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)
Corderos, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 30(), 1992
Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals' sperm displacement
Córdoba-Aguilar, J. Zool 261(), 2003
Patterns of speciation in Drosophila.
Coyne JA, Orr HA., Evolution 43(2), 1989
PMID: IND89023629

Orr, 2004

Dobzhansky, 1937
Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation
Drès, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lon. B 357(), 2002

Eberhard, 1985

Eberhard, 1996
Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences
Eberhard, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 106(), 2009
Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
Etges WJ, de Oliveira CC, Gragg E, Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor MA, Ritchie MG., Evolution 61(5), 2007
PMID: 17492965

Faraway, 2006
Skepticism towards Santa Rosalina, or why are there so few kinds of animals?
Felsenstein, Evolution 35(), 1981
Laboratory hybridization studies of Allonemobius fasciatus and A. socius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)
Gregory, Annal. Entomol. Soc. Am 86(), 1993

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry.
Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J., Nature 411(6835), 2001
PMID: 11357131
Gene geography of racial differences in Lochmaea capreae L. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae), and the problem of sympatric speciation
Kreslavskiy, Entomol. Rev 73(), 1994
Reinforcement: the road not taken
Marshall, Mol. Biol. Evol 17(), 2002
Comparative proteomics uncovers the signature of natural selection acting on the ejaculate proteomes of two cricket species isolated by postmating, prezygotic phenotypes.
Marshall JL, Huestis DL, Garcia C, Hiromasa Y, Wheeler S, Noh S, Tomich JM, Howard DJ., Mol. Biol. Evol. 28(1), 2010
PMID: 20805188
Drift promotes speciation by sexual selection.
Uyeda JC, Arnold SJ, Hohenlohe PA, Mead LS., Evolution 63(3), 2008
PMID: 19087180
Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.
Matute DR., PLoS Biol. 8(3), 2010
PMID: 20351771

Mayr, 1942

Mayr, 1963
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85(4), 2010
PMID: 20569253
Wise, winsome, or weird? Mechanisms of sperm storage in female animals
Neubaum, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol 41(), 1998
Ecological divergence promotes the evolution of cryptic reproductive isolation
Nosil, Proc. R. Soc. Lon. B 273(), 2006
Mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila.
Price CS, Kim CH, Posluszny J, Coyne JA., Evolution 54(6), 2000
PMID: 11209779
Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex.
Price CS, Kim CH, Gronlund CJ, Coyne JA., Evolution 55(1), 2001
PMID: 11263748

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012
Sexual selection and speciation
Ritchie, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 38(), 2007

Rohlf, 2007
Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies.
Rolan-Alvarez E, Caballero A., Evolution 54(1), 2000
PMID: 10937180
Ecological speciation
Rundle, Ecol. Lett 8(), 2005
Ecology and the origin of species.
Schluter D., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 16(7), 2001
PMID: 11403870
Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.
Schluter D., Science 323(5915), 2009
PMID: 19197053
Components of reproductive isolation between Orchis mascula and Orchis pauciflora.
Scopece G, Croce A, Lexer C, Cozzolino S., Evolution 67(7), 2013
PMID: 23815661
Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish.
Seehausen O, Terai Y, Magalhaes IS, Carleton KL, Mrosso HD, Miyagi R, van der Sluijs I, Schneider MV, Maan ME, Tachida H, Imai H, Okada N., Nature 455(7213), 2008
PMID: 18833272
The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data
Servedio, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 34(), 2003
The biology of speciation.
Sobel JM, Chen GF, Watt LR, Schemske DW., Evolution 64(2), 2009
PMID: 19891628
Reproductive protein evolution
Swanson, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 33(), 2002
Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps
Thornhill, Am. Nat 122(), 1983
Theory and speciation.
Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 16(7), 2001
PMID: 11403865
On the origin of species by natural and sexual selection.
van Doorn GS, Edelaar P, Weissing FJ., Science 326(5960), 2009
PMID: 19965377
Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers.
Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Saetre GP, Bures S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC., Nature 411(6833), 2001
PMID: 11333971

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up.
Via S., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 16(7), 2001
PMID: 11403871

Zelditch, 2012
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 27749980
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar