Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior

Wolff W, Schindler S, Englert C, Brand R, Kißler J (2016)
BMC Neuroscience 17(1): 18.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA 3.29 MB
Autor*in
Wolff, Wanja; Schindler, SebastianUniBi ; Englert, Christoph; Brand, Ralf; Kißler, JohannaUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
Background Deception can distort psychological tests on socially sensitive topics. Understanding the cerebral processes that are involved in such faking can be useful in detection and prevention of deception. Previous research shows that faking a brief implicit association test (BIAT) evokes a characteristic ERP response. It is not yet known whether temporarily available self-control resources moderate this response. We randomly assigned 22 participants (15 females, 24.23 ± 2.91 years old) to a counterbalanced repeated-measurements design. Participants first completed a Brief-IAT (BIAT) on doping attitudes as a baseline measure and were then instructed to fake a negative doping attitude both when self-control resources were depleted and non-depleted. Cerebral activity during BIAT performance was assessed using high-density EEG. Results Compared to the baseline BIAT, event-related potentials showed a first interaction at the parietal P1, while significant post hoc differences were found only at the later occurring late positive potential. Here, significantly decreased amplitudes were recorded for ‘normal’ faking, but not in the depletion condition. In source space, enhanced activity was found for ‘normal’ faking in the bilateral temporoparietal junction. Behaviorally, participants were successful in faking the BIAT successfully in both conditions. Conclusions Results indicate that temporarily available self-control resources do not affect overt faking success on a BIAT. However, differences were found on an electrophysiological level. This indicates that while on a phenotypical level self-control resources play a negligible role in deliberate test faking the underlying cerebral processes are markedly different.
Stichworte
EEG/ERP Implicit association test (IAT) Faking Deception Ego depletion Cognitive control
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Zeitschriftentitel
BMC Neuroscience
Band
17
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
18
ISSN
1471-2202
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2903589

Zitieren

Wolff W, Schindler S, Englert C, Brand R, Kißler J. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior. BMC Neuroscience. 2016;17(1): 18.
Wolff, W., Schindler, S., Englert, C., Brand, R., & Kißler, J. (2016). Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior. BMC Neuroscience, 17(1), 18. doi:10.1186/s12868-016-0249-8
Wolff, Wanja, Schindler, Sebastian, Englert, Christoph, Brand, Ralf, and Kißler, Johanna. 2016. “Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior”. BMC Neuroscience 17 (1): 18.
Wolff, W., Schindler, S., Englert, C., Brand, R., and Kißler, J. (2016). Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior. BMC Neuroscience 17:18.
Wolff, W., et al., 2016. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior. BMC Neuroscience, 17(1): 18.
W. Wolff, et al., “Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior”, BMC Neuroscience, vol. 17, 2016, : 18.
Wolff, W., Schindler, S., Englert, C., Brand, R., Kißler, J.: Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior. BMC Neuroscience. 17, : 18 (2016).
Wolff, Wanja, Schindler, Sebastian, Englert, Christoph, Brand, Ralf, and Kißler, Johanna. “Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior”. BMC Neuroscience 17.1 (2016): 18.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:18:38Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
e86c21d354c8e92548b479f0ca284f6f


Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

71 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


Ziegler M., 2012
Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes?
Gucciardi DF, Jalleh G, Donovan RJ., 2010
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK., 1998
Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.
Fazio RH, Olson MA., Annu Rev Psychol 54(), 2002
PMID: 12172003
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR., J Pers Soc Psychol 97(1), 2009
PMID: 19586237
Differences between men and women in self-reported body mass index and its relation to drug use.
Vera-Villarroel P, Piqueras JA, Kuhne W, Cuijpers P, van Straten A., Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 9(), 2014
PMID: 24383608
Faking the IAT: aided and unaided response control on the implicit association tests
Fiedler K, Bluemke M., 2005
Voluntary controllability of the implicit association test (IAT)
Kim DY., 2003
Faking of the implicit association test is statistically detectable and partly correctable
Cvencek D, Greenwald AG, Brown AS, Gray NS, Snowden RJ., 2010
Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect!
Rohner J, Schroder-Abe M, Schutz A., Exp Psychol 58(6), 2011
PMID: 21592941
What do fakers actually do to fake the IAT? An investigation of faking strategies under different faking conditions
Roehner J, Schroeder-Abe M, Schuetz A., 2013
The role of episodic memory in controlled evaluative judgments about attitudes: an event-related potential study.
Johnson R Jr, Simon EJ, Henkell H, Zhu J., Neuropsychologia 49(5), 2011
PMID: 21262245
Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.
Schindler S, Wolff W, Kissler JM, Brand R., Front Behav Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 26074798
The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
Johnson R Jr, Barnhardt J, Zhu J., Neuropsychologia 42(7), 2004
PMID: 14998703
When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
Lavric A, Pizzagalli DA, Forstmeier S., Eur. J. Neurosci. 20(9), 2004
PMID: 15525290
Neural markers of inhibition in human memory retrieval.
Wimber M, Bauml KH, Bergstrom Z, Markopoulos G, Heinze HJ, Richardson-Klavehn A., J. Neurosci. 28(50), 2008
PMID: 19074015
Conflict control during sentence comprehension: fMRI evidence.
Ye Z, Zhou X., Neuroimage 48(1), 2009
PMID: 19540923
Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Ganis G, Rosenfeld JP, Meixner J, Kievit RA, Schendan HE., Neuroimage 55(1), 2010
PMID: 21111834
The neuroscience of “ego depletion” or: how the brain can help us understand why self-control seems limited
Inzlicht M, Berkman E, Elkins-Brown N., 2016
Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource?
Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM., J Pers Soc Psychol 74(5), 1998
PMID: 9599441

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Consequences of stereotype suppression and internal suppression motivation: a self-regulation approach.
Gordijn EH, Hindriks I, Koomen W, Dijksterhuis A, Van Knippenberg A., Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30(2), 2004
PMID: 15030634
Quality-space theory in olfaction.
Young BD, Keller A, Rosenthal D., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 24474945
Running on empty: neural signals for self-control failure.
Inzlicht M, Gutsell JN., Psychol Sci 18(11), 2007
PMID: 17958704
Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism.
Botvinick M, Braver T., Annu Rev Psychol 66(), 2014
PMID: 25251491
Suppressing emotions impairs subsequent stroop performance and reduces prefrontal brain activation.
Friese M, Binder J, Luechinger R, Boesiger P, Rasch B., PLoS ONE 8(4), 2013
PMID: 23565239
Ego-depletion and prejudice: separating automatic and controlled components
Govorun O, Payne BK., 2006

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI)
Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ, Owen AE, Marsh BJ., 1999
The Brief Implicit Association Test.
Sriram N, Greenwald AG., Exp Psychol 56(4), 2009
PMID: 19439401
After depletion: the replenishment of the self’s regulatory resources
Tyler JM, Burns KC., 2008
Differences between men and women in self-reported body mass index and its relation to drug use.
Vera-Villarroel P, Piqueras JA, Kuhne W, Cuijpers P, van Straten A., Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 9(), 2014
PMID: 24383608
Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR., J Pers Soc Psychol 85(2), 2003
PMID: 12916565
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop JR., 1935
Ego depletion and persistent performance in a cycling task
Englert C, Wolff W., 2015
Can implementation intentions help to overcome ego-depletion?
Webb TL, Sheeran P., 2003
Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der” Positive and Negative Affect Schedule”(PANAS)
Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann CW, Tausch A., 1996

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping.
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF., Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72(2), 1989
PMID: 2464490
Corrigenda: EEG 02274
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF., 1990
Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies.
Litvak V, Friston K., Neuroimage 42(4), 2008
PMID: 18639641
EEG source imaging.
Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, Grave de Peralta R., Clin Neurophysiol 115(10), 2004
PMID: 15351361

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Cohen J., 1988
Anterobasal temporal lobe lesions alter recurrent functional connectivity within the ventral pathway during naming.
Campo P, Poch C, Toledano R, Igoa JM, Belinchon M, Garcia-Morales I, Gil-Nagel A., J. Neurosci. 33(31), 2013
PMID: 23904604
Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus.
Schindler S, Wegrzyn M, Steppacher I, Kissler J., J. Neurosci. 35(15), 2015
PMID: 25878274
Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M., Neuroimage 15(1), 2002
PMID: 11771995
Cerebral correlates of automatic associations towards performance enhancing substances
Schindler S, Wolff W., 1923
Preparation for action: an ERP study about two tasks provoking variability in response speed.
Wascher E, Verleger R, Jaskowski P, Wauschkuhn B., Psychophysiology 33(3), 1996
PMID: 8936395
Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.
Miller GA, Chapman JP., J Abnorm Psychol 110(1), 2001
PMID: 11261398

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
A region of right posterior superior temporal sulcus responds to observed intentional actions.
Saxe R, Xiao DK, Kovacs G, Perrett DI, Kanwisher N., Neuropsychologia 42(11), 2004
PMID: 15246282
Thinking about intentions.
den Ouden HE, Frith U, Frith C, Blakemore SJ., Neuroimage 28(4), 2005
PMID: 15964210
Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies.
Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J., Neurosci Biobehav Rev 42(), 2014
PMID: 24486722
A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction.
Carter RM, Huettel SA., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 17(7), 2013
PMID: 23790322
Imaging fatigue of interference control reveals the neural basis of executive resource depletion.
Persson J, Larsson A, Reuter-Lorenz PA., J Cogn Neurosci 25(3), 2012
PMID: 23163416
Self-regulatory depletion enhances neural responses to rewards and impairs top-down control.
Wagner DD, Altman M, Boswell RG, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF., Psychol Sci 24(11), 2013
PMID: 24026225
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 27142046
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar